Latest activity

See Solano(2022). https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/515/1/1380/6607509?login=false This is explained upthread. Vilarroel references that paper, but it's unclear which of the steps have been applied to her data set, since it doesn't match...

The map looks to me like something(s) flew in from the NW and picked up Highway I-17 at Spring Valley, followed that into Phoenix and picked up Highway I-10 and followed that away from town to the SE. I am not a pilot,but I am aware of the...

you gave it a leading prompt, which the AI you're presumably quoting will attempt to confirm, making the response doubly worthless

you gave it a leading prompt, which the AI you're presumably quoting will attempt to confirm, making the response doubly worthless

I can scan things at crazy resolutions as well, it doesn't mean that we have any more data

This is what I'm trying to work out - where and when is this validation process done, and by whom? Edit - i think maybe here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.10813 Launching the VASCO Citizen Science Project

What is needed is physical examination of the remaining, if any, intermediate physical stages of the print transfer from the original film. Scanning the print again doesn't really help.

What is needed is physical examination of the remaining, if any, intermediate physical stages of the print transfer from the original film. Scanning the print again doesn't really help.

I'm pretty sure it is a negative scan, isn't it ?

This is what I'm trying to work out - where and when is this validation process done, and by whom? Edit - i think maybe here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.10813 Launching the VASCO Citizen Science Project

What is needed is physical examination of the remaining, if any, intermediate physical stages of the print transfer from the original film. Scanning the print again doesn't really help.

By data I mean, time, location, height, lens, angle etc.

I can scan things at crazy resolutions as well, it doesn't mean that we have any more data

The Costa Rica case from 1971 is one of the cases I still find interesting. Mostly because the data is so good, and the image exists in 17,000 × 17,000 pixels, so there is no reason to complain that it is blurry :) We know exactly which camera...

This is what I'm trying to work out - where and when is this validation process done, and by whom? Edit - i think maybe here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.10813 Launching the VASCO Citizen Science Project