sure if you are going to clip off the sentence uttered before he responds, in order to prove some imaginary point.
You're never gonna convince me, because you are wrong on this one. can we move on?
sure if you are going to clip off the sentence uttered before he responds, in order to prove some imaginary point.
You're never gonna convince me, because you are wrong on this one. can we move on?
not sure how much it matters, but is it interesting that Russia and China abstained? <i dont follow UN stuff much, so that is an actual question.
The United Nations Security Council adopted a draft resolution condemning Iran's attacks on Gulf...
Given his desire to shoot the messenger, I can see why his advisors are reluctant to take that step. It has happened before, though, only to have him repeat the voices in his own head despite having previously been corrected.
If "those who care about good science don't like what I'm doing" is a "win", there's little more that needs saying.
Not that arXiv has ever been a particularly good arbiter (in particular in physics), but if they're ejecting your stuff you must...
Iran (like Russia) isn't really dependent on top shelf advanced weapons. Shahed drones are cheap, they're produced domestically, produced in Russia, claimed (but not last I knew proven) to be produced in North Korea and at offshore Russian...
Given his desire to shoot the messenger, I can see why his advisors are reluctant to take that step. It has happened before, though, only to have him repeat the voices in his own head despite having previously been corrected.
Nonsense, unless you think the "that" ending the first question refers to the report:
Reporter: I new report shows. A new report says that the military investigation has found the United States struck the school in Iran. As commander-in-chief...
If "those who care about good science don't like what I'm doing" is a "win", there's little more that needs saying.
Not that arXiv has ever been a particularly good arbiter (in particular in physics), but if they're ejecting your stuff you must...
If "those who care about good science don't like what I'm doing" is a "win", there's little more that needs saying.
Not that arXiv has ever been a particularly good arbiter (in particular in physics), but if they're ejecting your stuff you must...
Nonsense, unless you think the "that" ending the first question refers to the report:
Reporter: I new report shows. A new report says that the military investigation has found the United States struck the school in Iran. As commander-in-chief...
It's a win/win situation. If they put the paper back, then it's a triumph for woo believers everywhere over the gatekeepers of Big Science and another step towards disclosure. If the take down other papers, it's the evil gatekeepers of Big...
Dr. Villaroel has multiple prior VASCO papers hosted on arXiv, including submissions to the "astro-ph" category. The previously accepted papers employed the same methodology of the papers now rejected.
Careful, Mr. Mellon, the solution to that...
Christopher Mellon, on behalf of The Disclosure Foundation, has sent a letter to arXiv in response to its moderation and removal of two of Beatriz Villarroel's papers back in October.
Nonsense, unless you think the "that" ending the first question refers to the report:
Reporter: I new report shows. A new report says that the military investigation has found the United States struck the school in Iran. As commander-in-chief...