Latest activity

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uX9Cn9174Uo

Bellingcat have just published a report with apparent video footage (linked to Telegram from the Bellingcat site) of a Tomahawk cruise missile strike in Minab. The US is the only participant in the war that is known to have Tomahawk missiles...

I'm sure he probably has, but were those things in reference to situations as sensitive as 175 kids being bombed? I realize that's a subjective metric, but situations involving US intelligence and "war" actions I can't imagine him conveying...

He's the President of the USA. If he's relying on Twitter/ X as a major source of information about a calamitous loss of innocent life caused by events that he initiated, it's very worrying indeed. If his staff aren't informing him about what is...

i don't. he has meant social media or news reports before when he's said "from what i've seen".

Oh, Ann... This is a list of wars/conflicts/military actions/whateverwhocares the US has engaged in without approval from Congress https://www.warcosts.org/analysis/congressional-authority Right... Because Johnson, Nixon, Reagan, Bush 1...

@NoParty - Rewatch Hegseth's attemp at a self-congratulatory PR event at what was supposed to be a press briefing on the results of the June 2025 attacks on the Iranian nuclear program. When a reporter asks how we can know how much damage was...

Yeah, I didn't include Hegseth's remarks because what he said is worthless, and the buck stops with the President, who is incapable of taking responsibility.

Yeah, saw that. Even though the press generally reported it as Trump & Hegseth saying essentially the same thing, they really didn't: Trump, as is 100% usual for him, simply said what he thought was best for Trump, with zero regard for truth...

well thats all you ever do, so why is it so surprising to hear the media engages in that behavior as well?

Stunning: Two "independent" supposed public servants, both try to dodge serious war questions, with the attempted red herring that trying to get serious answers is actually trying "...to make the president look bad." :oops::rolleyes: Verbatim...

If the school was believed to be a military target, an attacker might well have used more than one munition. Unpalatable though it may seem, striking a target again is not a forbidden tactic: Some locations might have bunkers underneath; military...

Well, yes. If it's true, that the bomb site has been used as a civilian school for at least a decade, it seems inexcusable to try to claim you couldn't have known. "The findings reveal that the school had been clearly separate from an adjacent...

only because western countries are funding it. i dont want to start a fight on this topic, but if iranian regime stops funding the terrorists (because there is no longer an iranian regime) wouldnt that help at least some?

well if Ross is correct and McCasland is indeed "off the face of this earth", then he has knowledge NOW!