Latest activity

apparently not. then ignore them. 3/4th of both these iran threads are opinion and you havent whined about those. I dont see what that has to do with thousands of murdered citizens and torturing women (and men).

I believe he was annoyed by the question and he simply dodged it.

the topic is "did you see the new report on the school bombing and what do you have to say about it". I believe he was ignorant about the New York Times report at the time of the question. (fyi leaking classified information is a crime. i'm...

It's a good reminder about how unserious these people are.

Was about to post something similar. Testing the level of initiation in the audience is not only essential when communicating - it's also fun. Drop the odd shibboleth here and there and see who's still talking about UFO's and ET. Mrs McCasland...

I believe he was annoyed by the question and he simply dodged it.

I used to know a KC-135 crew chief who'd tell people they routinely refueled UFOs in flight just to see if they'd buy it.

really? you might want to go back and reread my opinion. yes GOD FORBID someone have a different opinion to you. ALL of them. i dont understand why you are asking why? are you familiar with the iranian regime?

He just proved you were wholly incorrect in your statement. That suggests but doesn't prove that your intent was to deflect attention from the multiple flaws in Trump's war of choice as laid out in the article. Since you have specifically stated...

you're picking on it because you're petty and hypocritical. usually you try to demonize me constantly for taking an off topic comment someone made and answering it. you accuse me of "there goes deirdre again derailing the thread. you always do...

Unnecessary, I read it correctly the first time Opinions unsupported by facts don't interest me much. That's why I'm here. About an order of magnitude more that you are from the evidence of this thread. Without using the internet, can you...

I'm picking on your use of it because it's unwarranted criticism of Biden in a thread that isn't about him or the economy, after you complained about people criticising Trump in a thread about a war he started. Wiktionary calls the term...

He just proved you were wholly incorrect in your statement. That suggests but doesn't prove that your intent was to deflect attention from the multiple flaws in Trump's war of choice as laid out in the article. Since you have specifically stated...

Well, I really wasn't expecting this one. :P

Is showing a non-inflammatory usage of 'Bidenomics' really your best evidence that 'Bidenflation' is used non-inflammatorily?