Latest activity

I'm picking on your use of it because it's unwarranted criticism of Biden in a thread that isn't about him or the economy, after you complained about people criticising Trump in a thread about a war he started. Wiktionary calls the term...

He just proved you were wholly incorrect in your statement. That suggests but doesn't prove that your intent was to deflect attention from the multiple flaws in Trump's war of choice as laid out in the article. Since you have specifically stated...

Well, I really wasn't expecting this one. :P

Is showing a non-inflammatory usage of 'Bidenomics' really your best evidence that 'Bidenflation' is used non-inflammatorily?

Thanks for the link. I just wrote a long comment on there pointing out all the errors he made (ugh). Although, he does say he doesn't think they saw aliens. He strawmans the puppet hypothesis and gets lots of other details wrong, unfortunately...

the topic is "did you see the new report on the school bombing and what do you have to say about it". I believe he was ignorant about the New York Times report at the time of the question. (fyi leaking classified information is a crime. i'm...

really? you might want to go back and reread my opinion. yes GOD FORBID someone have a different opinion to you. ALL of them. i dont understand why you are asking why? are you familiar with the iranian regime?

The topic of the reporter (and this thread) is the bombing of the school, which Trump has already lied about. His pretend-ignorance has all the believability of a small child with crumbs on his lips who claims he was never in that cookie jar...

he spoke fine this time. ps. Dont you think its odd that noone here is discussing the New York Times report, and are fixated on demonizing Trump? One wonders if they actually care what exactly caused the children to be killed.

It was a question about responsibility, which he immediately side-stepped having previously lied about knowing about it: "based on what I've seen, that was done by Iran..." [#103].

And in the very next post you say: I can see who's playing games. You're embarrassing yourself.

Should it have? Who were the officials?

For my money, the disgusting part is that the man who started the war has no fucking idea about Shajareh Tayyebeh... will get away with like he gets away felony convictions, treason, "grab 'em by the pussy" and on & on & on... People can engage...

the topic of the reporters question is "a new report on the school bombing". But thanks for playing.

Was about to post something similar. Testing the level of initiation in the audience is not only essential when communicating - it's also fun. Drop the odd shibboleth here and there and see who's still talking about UFO's and ET. Mrs McCasland...