TL;DR. A Russian weapon (probably using "pulsed" microwaves) was obtained from Russian criminals for $15 million (total mission cost, not the payout) by DHS undercover agents in 2024, and is being tested on animals at a military base, and appears...
I do not know how I can be more clear that I am NOT claiming we know that they got it wrong. So, asking me to support a claim I have clearly never made is... odd.
I'm saying that we know people get things wrong, and that we CAN'T know in this...
Sit back, have a glass of whisky and listen to this as you read:
"No word he gave - before he left one night"
"The midnight swallowed him - and left no clue"
Remarkable coincidence.
Then we resort to probability. Just how likely is it that explanation A, or B, or C explains an event. But the point I keep making is that you have to factor in all the aspects of the event. You can't just cherry pick those aspects that fit...
They might. But how do you know? If you don't know, how can you possibly use what is reported as meaningful evidence of much of anything at all, much less do what Big UFO likes to do and use it as compelling evidence of extraordinary claims...
Well, nice attempt at turning it all around....but actually I was the one asking how do you know that they did 'get it wrong' ?
And what does the Metro Vancouver case even prove ? It's all very well trying to to use it as an 'illustrative'...
You say, "no evidence either way"... which makes your "what if" pure speculation. I'm not sure exactly what you would consider evidence of the negative conclusion (that nothing unusual happened), but we certainly have no hard evidence at all of...
Having reported a UFO myself, I have to say there are few things more exasperating than having someone else who thinks he knows what you saw, even though he wasn't there, better than you who saw it with your own eyes.
I am 101% certain that...
we don't replace the military or all investigators every time there is an administration switch. i see no evidence to suggest the investigators are Trump hired people who might be purposefully not working fast enough.
it took a month and a half...
Well, nice attempt at turning it all around....but actually I was the one asking how do you know that they did 'get it wrong' ?
And what does the Metro Vancouver case even prove ? It's all very well trying to to use it as an 'illustrative'...
Our confidential sources tell us the still classified weapon has been tested in a U.S. military lab for more than a year. Tests on rats and sheep show injuries consistent with those seen in humans. Also, as a separate part of the investigation...
Our confidential sources tell us the still classified weapon has been tested in a U.S. military lab for more than a year. Tests on rats and sheep show injuries consistent with those seen in humans. Also, as a separate part of the investigation...
They might. But how do you know? If you don't know, how can you possibly use what is reported as meaningful evidence of much of anything at all, much less do what Big UFO likes to do and use it as compelling evidence of extraordinary claims...