One could argue that AI already shows precognition by finding meaningful patterns of information that humans miss, in advance. But I think that idea had already been explored in science fiction
I think mathematically it does, but we still experience the arrow of time and entropy. I'm not a math guy, though. There is no barrier to the future affecting the past on some levels, in theory.
it's incredibly interesting. but like gravity i doubt there will ever be an understanding of why/how/what it is. and it doesnt help anything in anyway
(unless you give it meaning of course. it could be comforting like God letting you know He is...
A high level of symbolic overlap between the event and frame of reference and experiences of a person, within a given time frame. The events giving rise to the observed phenomenon and the observer's frame of reference will overlap occasionally...
I think mathematically it does, but we still experience the arrow of time and entropy. I'm not a math guy, though. There is no barrier to the future affecting the past on some levels, in theory.
Some ideas about precognition involve the mind sorting things out before cognition, or that mind functions further upstream in time from the present. If there were to be a synchronous event that in the future that had meaning it presented a...
it's incredibly interesting. but like gravity i doubt there will ever be an understanding of why/how/what it is. and it doesnt help anything in anyway
(unless you give it meaning of course. it could be comforting like God letting you know He is...
If non-human technology (or non-human intelligence) is a sort of inclusive term that allows UFOs and UFOnauts to be not human and not extraterrestrials in the conventional sense (e.g. biological creatures from a planet a certain number of light...
A high level of symbolic overlap between the event and frame of reference and experiences of a person, within a given time frame. The events giving rise to the observed phenomenon and the observer's frame of reference will overlap occasionally...
What's the theoretical model to distinguish "synchronicity" and coincidence? A scientific approach would need to propose that to generate hypotheses to test.
Yes that's how I read it, at least. But that's a common result of short comments - unless we write entire essays (which I certainly won't be doing lol), misunderstandings are just gonna happen. I'm sorry you were so stressed out at that time...