Almost certainly a coincidence, and perhaps a tenuous one:
One of the interesting things about Lonnie Zamora's account is his description of a red insignia/ symbol on the object, discussed on this thread earlier.
Sketches made by Zamora
(from...
i dont think "polite" fixes the "i make an undisclosed amount of money from a client i can't name or hint at to build the UFO debunking tool" revelation. In fact, polite just makes it worse. Of course a government employee would be polite!
He...
I don't think its surprising that someone has taken the same data, followed the same methods, and ended up with the the same results. All that does is verify the process, but it doesn't validate the conclusions. What would be much more positive...
We should be cognisant that every reply Mick makes is also for the "invisible audience", people who might not be vocal but watch the conversation and see the tone of accusations and the replies.
I've looked in depth at several points he's raised over the years, and they are all complex theories built upon misunderstandings. I feel like it's wasting everyone's time.
This thread, and the forum, remains open to you and others to make...
i dont think "polite" fixes the "i make an undisclosed amount of money from a client i can't name or hint at to build the UFO debunking tool" revelation. In fact, polite just makes it worse. Of course a government employee would be polite!
He...
We should be cognisant that every reply Mick makes is also for the "invisible audience", people who might not be vocal but watch the conversation and see the tone of accusations and the replies.
i dont think "polite" fixes the "i make an undisclosed amount of money from a client i can't name or hint at to build the UFO debunking tool" revelation. In fact, polite just makes it worse. Of course a government employee would be polite!
He...
I don't think its surprising that someone has taken the same data, followed the same methods, and ended up with the the same results. All that does is verify the process, but it doesn't validate the conclusions. What would be much more positive...
We should be cognisant that every reply Mick makes is also for the "invisible audience", people who might not be vocal but watch the conversation and see the tone of accusations and the replies.
i dont think "polite" fixes the "i make an undisclosed amount of money from a client i can't name or hint at to build the UFO debunking tool" revelation. In fact, polite just makes it worse. Of course a government employee would be polite!
He...
We should be cognisant that every reply Mick makes is also for the "invisible audience", people who might not be vocal but watch the conversation and see the tone of accusations and the replies.