I regard them as probably "trolls", which is the claim also being put forward here. The only content I have put forward on my own account is a certain factual statement and a question, or rather a conjecture, namely:
"For months some chemtrails activists have been announcing their gut feeling that we (they?) are on the verge of a “breakthrough” and that the other side (whether official agencies such as NASA or well-known geoengineering advocates such as David Keith) were shortly going to “admit the truth".
Is this going to be the way, (I ask), step by step, "the truth will be admitted" with The International Chemtrail Association saying what it says, its input coexisting with continuing official denials, and the balance gradually, imperceptibly, changing?"
If you wish to debunk me, debunk that factual statement and question, or rather conjecture. Whether or not I agree with chemtrails activists about their claims concerning contrails/chemtrail or anything else is neither here nor there. I simply ask Metabunk what it thinks of the idea of the International Chemtrail Association having a possible future mission of the kind I describe.