Search results for query: nist test explosive
Forum search Google search
-
Would the WTC Twin Towers have collapsed from fire alone, without plane impact?
The FACT that NIST did not test for explosives has been discussed ad nauseum https://www.metabunk.org/search/530235/?q=nist+test+explosive&o=relevance. Please do not talk about it here. It is off topic. -
H
Would the WTC Twin Towers have collapsed from fire alone, without plane impact?
No, justify why NIST wouldn't test for explosive residue in the steel when it seems totally plausible from both recent history and eyewitness accounts that Al-Qaeda may have used bombs in addition to planes to attack the towers on 9/11. -
Would the WTC Twin Towers have collapsed from fire alone, without plane impact?
NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel. The responses to previous questions demonstrate why NIST concluded that there were no explosives or controlled demolition involved in the collapses of the WTC towers. .... Analysis of the WTC steel for the elements in... -
Would the WTC Twin Towers have collapsed from fire alone, without plane impact?
Is there recent history that Al-Qaeda had terrorists sneak into a building, secretly gain access to steel columns, plant explosives on selected columns without anyone knowing, leave, then at a later date, coincide plane impacts with setting off those explosives? -
Would the WTC Twin Towers have collapsed from fire alone, without plane impact?
First, there is no audio or visual evidence of explosive or thermitic devices. Second, the entire world trade center site was hand picked over by the FDNY, the NYPD (including its arson and explosives squad), FEMA, the FBI, the NTSB and many others as they searched for the remains and plane...- benthamitemetric
- Post #642
- Forum: 9/11
-
H
Would the WTC Twin Towers have collapsed from fire alone, without plane impact?
Wow, so much work only to not do the final and most conclusive step, which would be to simply test the steel. Even if you have reason to think bombs weren't necessary to collapse the building, why not just check? Does it cost like a billion dollars to check the steel for some explosive residues... -
Would the WTC Twin Towers have collapsed from fire alone, without plane impact?
@Henkka, please give me a brutally honest answer which I know you're capable of producing as you've given me one before: Do you not see from the above citation and earlier ones that your undercurrent attitude towards the NIST report is negative and even condescending? If you do, you must... -
H
Would the WTC Twin Towers have collapsed from fire alone, without plane impact?
Well, that might have something to do with the fact that they didn't even look: By the way, they don't say it explicitly, but I believe the last part of the answer to question #29 is the only reference NIST makes to the steel samples examined in FEMA Appendix C. Basically, the entire mystery... -
Would the WTC Twin Towers have collapsed from fire alone, without plane impact?
See parts in red... -
What is this woman hearing as WTC7 collapses behind her
They didn't look for explosives which should make explosive noises because there were no explosive noises, and because the cause of the collapse was already explained (and even predicted) by fire and collision damage by the NYFD before NIST even started. They didn't look for slowly steel-melting...- Hierophant
- Post #29
- Forum: 9/11
-
Debunked: Iron Microspheres in 9/11 WTC Dust as Evidence for Thermite
Please read the paper, it makes claims not supported by the experimental data. DSC not match thermite, and the energy for four samples does not match. How do you explain the energy and DSC? Harrit and Jones waved their hands and declared thermite, yet not a single piece of WTC steel was damaged...- Keith Beachy
- Post #725
- Forum: 9/11
-
"100 Critical Points About 9/11 "
The evidence for possible use of explosives is contained in the WTC 7 dust. And what did NIST do? It did not test the dust. There is no reason for them to not officially test the dust other than to cover up certain elements that would contradict their predetermined conclusions. Obviously NIST... -
"100 Critical Points About 9/11 "
This argument is pointless: A) If they were covering something up, they would have pretended to test the dust, and pretended to find nothing. B) The dust has been independently tested since, and no explosive residue was found. -
Chomsky dispels 9/11 conspiracies with sheer logic [video]
So the not testing of evidence of explosives is evidence of explosives? That is simply evidence of a lack of testing, but if that is your only hobby-horse then you have nothing. -
"100 Critical Points About 9/11 "
What evidence of explosives is in the dust? What chemicals were present? Why the focus on NIST, were the FBI not investgating it either? Where is the evidence on the steel that explosives were used? simply saying someone failed to test for something does not equate to that something being present. -
Why don't Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Fund Research?
We are talking about an organization run by a guy that repeatedly pointed to the wrong computer model and claimed NIST "couldn't even get their model to look like the collapse." Come on, they sat Gage down, along with Griffin and Avery, and showed him a test proving that fire can weaken steel...- Representative Press
- Post #108
- Forum: 9/11
-
Chomsky dispels 9/11 conspiracies with sheer logic [video]
The defenders of the official explanation just won't get it. ---->>> There is no need to have evidence of suspected involvement of explosives.<<<--- When there is high order building damage there are guidelines to follow (NFPA 921) which calls for testing of accelerant & explosive residue. -
Does NIST not testing for explosives and not testing WTC7 steel invalidate everything
Brilliant. That's highly comic. Working it through. :) -
WTC 7 (Building 7)
Mick don't you understand NIST was on a leash? How on earth could they come up with explosive residue when the president on day 1 said it were the terrorists with planes? NIST obviously chose to not test the dust. -
Why don't Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth Fund Research?
Sorry I didn't check this thread until today. NIST isn't a political lobby group like AE911Truth. In a fire investigation of unknown origin, the source of the fire is investigated. In the case of the towers and WTC 7, the source of the fires were known. There would be no approval to investigate...- Alienentity
- Post #56
- Forum: 9/11