In their paper, they include one point labeled "P01 anchor", but it is not the Flarkey Point, but a different point about 400 m to the NE.
The FP is approximately behind the black dot in the red marker (not where the marker indicates, that's the...
You need to be on a keyframe. Typically, you'd use the first frame. The points in the video view will be dim if you are not on a keyframe. Needs some UX improvements.
Not that I can tell.
Since it's essentially linear motion for both the drone and the object, there's an infinite number of solutions. But if we restrict it to ones where the object maintains level altitude, then there's just a narrow range with...
https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?custom=1/Rostami%20harbor/20260809_210128.js
While this one looks like a good fit, it's probably not. The camera is only 3.2NM from the target, but could well be much more, like 10-40NM, and still get a similar...
It's a fiddly case, as the motion of the platform (aka the sensor, aka the drone) is hidden somewhat by vertical changes in the camera angle, possibly from the slight left/right banking. The motion is rather small and difficult to track. I think...
Shipped:
The blimp:
https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?custom=99999999/test%201/20260809_160952.js
Venus and skyscrapers
https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?custom=99999999/NYC%20Venus/20260809_162406.js
Yes, that's on the list. Essentially keyframing the features by hand in 3D. You'd probably want three, so you can see if it's a straight line.
Still running through the tests here. Shipping soon.
https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?custom=99999999/test%201/20260809_160952.js
Bit fiddly, as I had to find the rooftop structure, which is nearly invisible in the video, but once I found that it resolved to about head height just outside a business.