Mick West's latest activity

I'm curious what kinds of people in the science community found them "rather clear"? Do you think they really understood the issues?

Communication and investigation. Perhaps these issues you are seeing are failures in communication.

I have deleted Zaine's last post as it was a long list of assertions with no evidence to back them up. In particular, two different claims that I had found the same thing that they had. Without actually demonstrating what was found and how it was...

My apologies for misunderstanding. I'm not really sure what you are envisaging, though.

My apologies, but have you not proposed a balloon or other windborne object? And would it not have to be rotating?

It's been a crazy day today, but long story short Metabunk was right but it took a TV programme for the Belgian Defence Minister to admit it. A pat on the back for all those that checked the ADS-B in November...

It's not really important if it's prosaic; it's: does it fit the observations? It's fine pointing out these little quibbles, but if your only alternative is some flying saucer (Marik's favorite), or a bizarrely rotating balloon (TheCholla), then...

That's overstating. I got a similar curve in a panorama, the cause of which is undetermined. Please stop paraphrasing, or you will be banned. Use quotes.

To discuss his claims. Which I'd be doing more of if I had the time and inclination. It's just a way of focussing the discussion instead of appending it to a much longer and older thread.

While kind of interesting, those numbers are irrelevant. They don't account for the number of transients per tile in their analysis, and there's at least one in nearly every tile. So it comes down to a correlation between the days on which...

No, they are assertions. If they are in the data, then I would agree with you. You are pushing Marik's interpretation, your interpretation, and the perceptions and memories of the pilots, as if they are inviolable representations of reality.

Those are not "facts", they are assertions. Please stop doing that.

Fixed!

In order for any explanation of such things to be definitive, you need to know where the clouds are. The simple way to demonstrate that any theory works is to model it in 3D. I've been on-and-off (mostly off) messing with getting Gimbal working...

Nobody claimed that. Stop inventing things. And stop ignoring when people answer your question. If you don't like the answer, then explain why, but don't pretend it's been ignored.