Thank you.
My instinct is "but they ARE sloping towards each other!!!" (as in individual pieces), then I see the whole and I'm "ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh".
I like how you can almost see the effect passing through as you concentrate on more and more...
The idea is not new. See https://www.metabunk.org/threads/contrail-prevention-studies-trials.14345/
The FAA even had a contrails research roadmap before February 2025.
I assume Gates is stepping up because the USG dropped the ball.
And now the NYT has given a glowing review to Rey and De Granados's propaganda piece. Hopefully Mick will talk about this.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/11/books/review/the-havana-syndrome-michael-rey-oriana-zill-de-granados.html
(archived...
Not piling on, but just expanding on what @Mendel talked about above. It's not just that ARRO said this and UAPTF said that. It's looking at how they worked and who was involved.
The UAPTF was a bit of an ad-hoc throw together after the NYT...
Not piling on, but just expanding on what @Mendel talked about above. It's not just that ARRO said this and UAPTF said that. It's looking at how they worked and who was involved.
The UAPTF was a bit of an ad-hoc throw together after the NYT...
The idea is not new. See https://www.metabunk.org/threads/contrail-prevention-studies-trials.14345/
The FAA even had a contrails research roadmap before February 2025.
I assume Gates is stepping up because the USG dropped the ball.
Not piling on, but just expanding on what @Mendel talked about above. It's not just that ARRO said this and UAPTF said that. It's looking at how they worked and who was involved.
The UAPTF was a bit of an ad-hoc throw together after the NYT...
What would you consider good evidence of UFOs as something exotic? And I mean without considering what people claim they know (Grusch and many others for example).
Would you (or anyone else) mind explaining the illusion please, cos I've stared at it for quite a while trying to work out what I'm seeing wrong but I'm struggling.
Thanks Mick. Worth adding what is and isn't in that release, because it changes what anyone can do with it.
The 107,875-row file is the VASCO 2025 sample. The detection output behind Solano et al. (2022). It carries RA, Dec and observation date...
Lots of great responses above. I agree with a lot to varying degrees*. The main point I was picking up on was:
We all have our biases. The claim here is that AARO are trustworthy when they say there are no NH visitors because they are government...