Latest activity

Don't forget: the day Metabunk went first online!

Off-topic a bit, always uncomfortable with ufology's use of "Nordic", and UFO enthusiast's apparent lack of insight into why it might be a problematic term (as well as the startling improbability of aliens not only resembling humans but a...

You're right, of course. Nordics are described more often as being silvery blue. I believe those "beautiful" people were invented as the modern-day succubus, providing a sort of UFO porn to turn "believers" into "hopers". As for tic-tacs, I can...

Don't forget: the day Metabunk went first online!

I love the turn of phrase: "The government has begun releasing information we were never allowed to see". This ranks videos of white dots that turn out to be birds as forbidden knowledge. (Somehow it feels he's not been referring to the Epstein...

Just hoping a certain senior US figure doesn't blame Taiwan for all these incursions where US forces are operating, Taiwan, officially the Republic of China (ROC)... Wikipedia, Taiwan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan

And who flies the jellyfish, the hammers, the orbs, the black triangles, the rods, and the cubes within the circles? I need more of a dramatis personae. Plus the eggs, who makes Barber's eggs?

Just hoping a certain senior US figure doesn't blame Taiwan for all these incursions where US forces are operating, Taiwan, officially the Republic of China (ROC)... Wikipedia, Taiwan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan

You're right, of course. Nordics are described more often as being silvery blue. I believe those "beautiful" people were invented as the modern-day succubus, providing a sort of UFO porn to turn "believers" into "hopers". As for tic-tacs, I can...

Just hoping a certain senior US figure doesn't blame Taiwan for all these incursions where US forces are operating, Taiwan, officially the Republic of China (ROC)... Wikipedia, Taiwan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan

in the recent PURSUE releases the interesting bits were described using the term 'region of contrast' - which I thought was pretty accurate. Much better than 'orb' or even 'UAP'.

It's quite refreshing to see them described as "dots" instead of "orbs".

The problem they have is that identifying prosaic stuff is much easier than confirming anomalous stuff. Also, the vast amount of cases are prosaic objects either mis or un-identified due to lack of data or abundance of poor quality data. So...

Oh my, it looks like Avi Loeb is joining the debunker crowd! I have said that Project Galileo might turn out interesting/useful stuff, and here it is.

Avi Loeb and the coauthors of this paper released today agree that this video very likely shows birds and that the speed estimate in the description is a misinterpretation due to parallax and misjudged distance. They analyzed the pulse frequency...