I found a frame in which there are a minimum number of satellites.
High confidence. This is the constellation Aquila. Pretty much the same part of the sky as in this thread...
I found a frame in which there are a minimum number of satellites.
High confidence. This is the constellation Aquila. Pretty much the same part of the sky as in this thread...
If you move the camera up the road a bit the hills and the tower start to match, but the buildings are still a little out
But the foreground starts to match the river valley patterning better
And the stars match for the time at 2:40 25/9/26
So...
yeah perhaps this means the viewing position I found is not quite correct.. The hills behind don't quite match and the angle between buildings and tower is not right, unless there are newer buildings on some of the new lots
Is there an option to turn off the translation? It's annoying in case I want to quote the (say)Reddit post. I prefer not to access Reddit, and I cannot copy or screenshot the embedded post because it's in Italian.
Sorry I meant west when I said east in my OP, doh
Recent articles say he's seeing them again, which us implying they are recent, of course that could just be some 'errors', but this thread can help determine it maybe..
Finding the red beacon...