In my opinion hard science could still study flying objects or phenomena and come across real new discoveries, but very probably not alien life.
I enjoy reading about ufology from a sociological point of view, but I'm also on Metabunk and I enjoy...
I'm not skeptical about the existence of anomalous objects. And I generally try to let folks do their own thing on this forum without challenging them much anymore. It certainly hasn't been easy. But I think (hope) folks here would like to be...
Yes, but that is already being done.
I'm ok with both: Studying UFOs as a social/psychological/archetypal phenomenon and also studying the real flying objects.
The two things don't necessarily need to be correlated.
With a typical landing speed for a 737 at around 130 knots, this also neatly demonstrates the unreliability of the casual observer's claims about the estimated speed of any flying objects.
With a typical landing speed for a 737 at around 130 knots, this also neatly demonstrates the unreliability of the casual observer's claims about the estimated speed of any flying objects.
"Most cases are due to parallax, but planes can stand still in the air when the headwind matches their ground speed."
Their *ground* speed?!? Wouldn't that be zero in a "hover"?
"Most cases are due to parallax, but planes can stand still in the air when the headwind matches their ground speed."
Their *ground* speed?!? Wouldn't that be zero in a "hover"?
With a typical landing speed for a 737 at around 130 knots, this also neatly demonstrates the unreliability of the casual observer's claims about the estimated speed of any flying objects.
I couldn't find any obvious connection between Sedona and nuclear weapons testing or development.
Wikipedia, Sedona, Arizona https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedona,_Arizona
Maybe the nuclear tests in the 1950s and after in the American southwest...
I went out yesterday to see if I could spot the occultation of Jupiter by the moon. Being a very thin sliver of a crescent moon, in full daylight, this was not going to be easy, especially with a bit of high altitude haze (not apparent in this...
"Most cases are due to parallax, but planes can stand still in the air when the headwind matches their ground speed."
Their *ground* speed?!? Wouldn't that be zero in a "hover"?