Latest activity

Wow! Hadn’t seen that new Time cover. Last time I saw a UFO-related Time cover was in 2010, which was quite a year for me.

While this possibility warms my heart, recent evidence says: "No fucking way!" If these guys can take zero quality evidence, and get their yarns on the cover of Time Magazine, there's no reason to believe that 2 more years of nothingburgers will...

Clouds: Dublin airport weather 1700Z yesterday (SYNOP code) SN08/09/2026 17:00->AAXX 0817103969 42580 32911 10156 20089 30012 40099 52017 83500 333 81622 83648== The third digit 5 in the second group 42580 indicates cloud base...

Windows 11, Edge. My issue before was that I couldnt tell the difference between 6am and 6pm Now when I load up the app for the first time it shows a 24hr clock time, which is fine But when I go to change the time the hrs are not in 24hrs...

I couldn't match the sats (probably an imprecise time/location) But the star tracking worked really well on this video https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?custom=11433/Reddit%20Nightvision/20260909_121230_d59006243e9fba6bfc449d8442c67fb9.js

Please post the sitch and the debug log

Odd, It looks different to me. What is that screenshot from? (Browser/device)

A sighting yesterday, reported on Twitter, with ATC recording: Source: https://x.com/Shauns_Aviation/status/2097394430500376701?s=20 The flight number EI3931 and position puts the incident at around 1715 UTC (18:15 local time) on September 8...

Yes - video attached. However depending on the height of the clouds, the plane could have had a backdrop of cloud which would have both hidden the horizon and provided a convenient white background to disguise the white fuselage. Maybe adding...

That’s a very well-considered answer.

That's a gimme.

1-nothing will come of it-but to believers Grusch will become a psyop/disinfo agent. Thats the next step in the grift-o-cycle-its already happening imo (i cant understand why they listened to him in the first place) 2-true-there never has been...

1: I hope so. He is neither believable nor stable. 2: True ...same as it has been true for about a century. 3: True. 4: Nope, there will be nothing new coming out to "prove" anything. Edit to add: I completely agree with @NorCal Dave 's concerns...

You've left out humidity, which I think (opinion) would be the defining factor.

Absent the hoaxers showing up in person, with negatives, camera and such, and them taking people to the location where the pictures were taken, there is no way to conclusively debunk it. Trials have shown it could be fake, but that is not proof...