Latest activity

1: I hope so. He is neither believable nor stable. 2: True ...same as it has been true for about a century. 3: True. 4: Nope, there will be nothing new coming out to "prove" anything. Edit to add: I completely agree with @NorCal Dave 's concerns...

You've left out humidity, which I think (opinion) would be the defining factor.

Absent the hoaxers showing up in person, with negatives, camera and such, and them taking people to the location where the pictures were taken, there is no way to conclusively debunk it. Trials have shown it could be fake, but that is not proof...

Absent the hoaxers showing up in person, with negatives, camera and such, and them taking people to the location where the pictures were taken, there is no way to conclusively debunk it. Trials have shown it could be fake, but that is not proof...

Absent the hoaxers showing up in person, with negatives, camera and such, and them taking people to the location where the pictures were taken, there is no way to conclusively debunk it. Trials have shown it could be fake, but that is not proof...

You've left out humidity, which I think (opinion) would be the defining factor.

Sadly, I don't agree with number 1. They've been around for decades, and they'll be around for decades to come. Names will change, claims will change, but the circus will go on. And the evidence will continue to be lacking, because this has never...

Next time, fly a kite in front of the cloud to show it who's boss.

Now we'll never know...

I often think that UFO hoaxes and fluff pieces about them on news channels are considered a kind of "harmless" fun in some ways, of course even in the past there were sometimes mentally unstable people exploited by them. However these "post...

Sadly, I don't agree with number 1. They've been around for decades, and they'll be around for decades to come. Names will change, claims will change, but the circus will go on. And the evidence will continue to be lacking, because this has never...

That’s a very well-considered answer.

Rear view of an A320 in Aer Lingus livery, against a light background. A bit of blur and glare... could it be mistaken for a black drone?

A sighting yesterday, reported on Twitter, with ATC recording: Source: https://x.com/Shauns_Aviation/status/2097394430500376701?s=20 The flight number EI3931 and position puts the incident at around 1715 UTC (18:15 local time) on September 8...

A sighting yesterday, reported on Twitter, with ATC recording: Source: https://x.com/Shauns_Aviation/status/2097394430500376701?s=20 The flight number EI3931 and position puts the incident at around 1715 UTC (18:15 local time) on September 8...