What we shouldn't forget is the hard won methodological lessons learned.
I would say the current UFOlogy culture thing is just another turn of the vinyl LP with one circular groove. It just goes 'round and 'round. On this turn there is less rigor.
All things change with time.
Once upon a time talking about UFO's would get you laughed at, especially in government and academia, and ignored.
But we may now be at a tipping point where some people are willing to take the chance. Some out of...
All things change with time.
Once upon a time talking about UFO's would get you laughed at, especially in government and academia, and ignored.
But we may now be at a tipping point where some people are willing to take the chance. Some out of...
All things change with time.
Once upon a time talking about UFO's would get you laughed at, especially in government and academia, and ignored.
But we may now be at a tipping point where some people are willing to take the chance. Some out of...
From interestingengineering.com
https://interestingengineering.com/culture/academics-say-theyve-seen-ufos
I don't know how the survey was carried out.
<edit>. Looks like
"The findings of this study were published in the peer-reviewed academic...
Perhaps she means "real reluctance of prominent scientists to agree with me". Nope, prominent or not, it's seen as a scientific dead end, not a thing that would enhance one's resumé but a subject that would always follow a career: "He's into...
I'd be interested in seeing current studies that are more reputable, then. I was trying to spare you the title, as it was evident.
I think the full paper is available here, at Nature:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-01746-3
From interestingengineering.com
https://interestingengineering.com/culture/academics-say-theyve-seen-ufos
I don't know how the survey was carried out.
<edit>. Looks like
"The findings of this study were published in the peer-reviewed academic...
Perhaps she means "real reluctance of prominent scientists to agree with me". Nope, prominent or not, it's seen as a scientific dead end, not a thing that would enhance one's resumé but a subject that would always follow a career: "He's into...
"real reluctance to touch the subject" ?
Oh really? Seems like we have a bumper crop of people trying to 'touch the subject' these days. Far more than say five years ago.
The actual head line is "Nearly 20% of academics surveyed say they've seen a UFO, or know someone who has
Including that last is odd since 10 - 24% (depending on the survey) of Americans claim to have seen one. That suggests academics are less...
From interestingengineering.com
https://interestingengineering.com/culture/academics-say-theyve-seen-ufos
I don't know how the survey was carried out.
<edit>. Looks like
"The findings of this study were published in the peer-reviewed academic...
I'd be interested in seeing current studies that are more reputable, then. I was trying to spare you the title, as it was evident.
I think the full paper is available here, at Nature:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-01746-3
"real reluctance to touch the subject" ?
Oh really? Seems like we have a bumper crop of people trying to 'touch the subject' these days. Far more than say five years ago.
Sorry, not very interesting, just bit of housekeeping to correct an earlier errror:
Should've read The Daily Star is a stablemate of The Daily Express. The same applies, the Star hasn't been known for serious journalism in recent years.