I suspect it's using a different optical pathway to detect the laser returns and then overlaying them. The LTD seems likely as there's a flashing red dot that moves when the camera moves. That would be the laser on the ground.
Yeah, I'm leaning towards it NOT hitting the wire now. I'm playing around with trajectories, and it does not seem like the ball is high enough to hit the wire.
We'd need to see the video with timestamps, which isnt going to happen. But then we have Nyland, the goalkeep who protested immediately after the goal.
As England celebrate, Norway are up in arms, no one more so than Nyland, who runs towards...
It's an interesting event given that we have multiple high-quality videos from different directions and yet two distinct camps of "I know what I saw" (see) have emerged.
Haaland on the pitch seems to indicate that there was contact. There were reports of the Norwegian bench immediately reacting.
Looking at the graph the massive impact from the kick causes a peak to about 70 (unknown units, assuming the line...
I used Sitrec to make a panorama video
I really can't see where there's a change in trajectory.
I suspect there probably was a contact, as several people claimed to see it at the time. I don't think it was consequential. Unlikely anything...
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vEUrArVAkU
It looks fake. If you want feedback, explain in a post exactly why you think it's not fake. I know you attached a PDF, but site guidelines require information to be in a post.
Here's a...
All it is that the distortion in the paper angles it to the light from the window to the left which means it's blown out like some areas of his shirt.
Nothing about this photo looks obviously wrong to me as a photographer.
I had my AI team spend about 30 minutes on this topic, and it gave this reasonable overview of the evidence, with this conclusion:
Executive conclusion
The publicly available evidence establishes that some fragmented .30-caliber projectile...
Start a new thread in the UFO forum. Attach the PDF, but also add a summary of the key points of evidence and analysis in your post. See: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/metabunks-link-policy.5158/
I think that might be confounded by motion blur and the stabilization. If there's motion blur in the direction of on-screen motion, but that motion is hidden by the stabilization, then it might create more of a shape change than actually existed.