I'm surprised no one mentioned that sticky little issue of the size of the hole in the pentagon vs the size of the airplane. Its those troublesome facts that seem to be the problem here. Same with the color of the glowing metal in the WTC rubble pile the size of the hole in the pentagon definitively negates any argument of a large jet liner hitting the building. Eye witnesses are notoriously unreliable.
In any jet liner crash the pieces are again mapped out precisely where they landed, but again at the pentagon we have what look like office workers out putting debris into trash bags and hauling it off to parts unknown. Where is the reconstructed plane from the debris ? Why is the hole in the building wildly smaller than the plane that supposedly hit the building.
If I were a magician and I wanted people to believe a rabbit can disappear, I'd show them the rabbit, I'd show them the hat, I'd make sure those in the front row thought they saw that rabbit go into that hat and I'd be depending on all those people sitting way in back to take mime the reaction of the people up front.
The simple truth is that the rabbit can't disappear into a hat and an air plane with a 125' wing span and at least 45' tall can't disappear into a whole roughly a third that size. Sorry kids, but that plane doesn't fit that damage. Conclusion, we may not know what did hit the pentagon, but we can be pretty sure what didn't.
oh and there's a whole other pretty good argument that a plane that large can't fly that fast that low due to ground effects, or the engines sucking up the lawn, sooooo where's the engine damage on the lawn, for that matter where's the engines ? Those titanium cores are pretty much indestructible, and certainly survived the WTC attacks.
OK I moved this from another thread. Having read this thread I've so far seen an unrecognizable bit of debris I'm being told is a flight recorder. I'm also being told that a government agency claims to have been able to read information off that unrecognizable bit of debris and that, that information just happens to match the policy/party line from another government agency. With the sole physical evidence is a really really small hole in the pentagon, some downed poles that may or may not represent the party line and some type of aircraft debris which independent investigators have never seen or been allowed to reassemble into whatever it may be.
Sorry but I remain extremely skeptical of a 757 disappearing into the proverbial hat.
I will also remain skeptical of bodies having been pictured within the rubble, or of any recovery of bodies during the never before seen citizen scrubbing of this airplane crash site. If you or I walked onto a debris field of a commercial flight disaster and started picking up debris, we'd be arrested on the spot for interfering with a federal investigation.