Once again a lot of claims no proof. Please read the posting guidelines.
Ok so what claim is not right, are you saying then that if the passport was say on a seat or bag or in a pocket, that it will not be moving forward when the plane impacts?
I don't need a source to prove that i need you to know how the world works. If i am on a moving object and i hit something i do not stop moving in the direction i was going and i move at the same speed i was until gravity affects me.
I assert that something does not just go sideways by magic it requires an external force acting upon an object to alter its direction i do not need proof it is self evident if you have ever lived in the world
I assert a bag cannot pass through a core wall, core columns a core wall and a perimeter wall, plus any number of office items.
Again i do not need to prove this type of thing, YOU do.
I am not the wild claim maker in saying that it can.
I am saying if the passport is in a bag or jacket in a cockpit or on a seat and thus unencumbered when impact happens, it will not only move ahead at the speed it was going, while the plane already is slowing, but that no fuel can soak it.
As far as saying the fuel soaked the passport, well, is the fbi not good enough a source?
And that i am attempting to verify further since Mick suggested they meant smelled like not soaked.
So i cannot explain all things to you but here is a starter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertia
and here is a bit more
http://wtcdata.nist.gov/gallery2/v/...Global+Analyses/WTC1/GA3_Trans_Top_1.avi.html
and another bit
Now what i want you to do is observe that in sim 1- the front of the plane is torn open, also though there is no deformation to walls or columns in this simulation ( there is none except in isolated parts like wing bits, engine bits, nose hit) What can be seen is that items break up and pass through multiple objects, the objects you see will be parts of the plane, the objects in front of it which are not there are going to be hijackers and pilots that were flung forwards as the window and nose was mashed to nothing and driven into every wall/floor/column in its way. But you call me a liar and tell me that a bag or body will survive that and release a pretty little passport in great condition without even a bend in it.
Then, go to the last sim, notice again how the plane dips down into the floor but then rather than staying that way and the rest plowing downwards, it just straightens itself up, the passport, being in the cockpit, is being punched down through a floor and dropping to the bottom of the room it enters, a floor which also will be broken and so ripping into the floor with fuel and debris and flame will damage that passport and punch it through into the core at best where it will fall.
But you call me a liar. That is just fine, but i think if you watch these and other sims, research who was meant to be in the cockpit, research impact analysis, and kinetic energy graphs. You will either have to admit that the passport if in the cockpit, realistically cannot survive, but, if by a miracle it did, it sure as hell wont be unscratched or unbent.
Or just say "no proof"
But, by YOUR version, NIST has "no proof" that the plane cut any columns at all. It just shows a plane going in and breaking up, and isolated engine/ wings impacting columns but backed by NO (that's NONE) PHYSICAL TESTS so either accept what is based on the facts of the physical worlds and the models made by the official version, or call them liars too