Building 7 is EMPIRICAL Proof of a controlled demolition, thanks for the vid.
It opens with a series of arguments from personal incredulity and intuition: "I couldn't figure out what happened ... it seemed like bombs". Then simply repeats the normal conspiracy theories, but in Danish, along with the refrain "but we are simply asking questions".
What is the most significant bit of actual evidence (not just "looked a bit odd", or "seems incredible") in this video that you agree with?
Of course they buildings 1 and 2 looked like that, they were all controlled demolitions.Er, no it's not. If it were, then we would not be having this discussion.
But if building 7 is proof of controlled demolition, then does that mean that building 1 and 2, which looked nothing like that, were NOT controlled demolition?
Of course they buildings 1 and 2 looked like that, they were all controlled demolitions.
Building 7 is EMPIRICAL Proof of a controlled demolition, thanks for the vid.
The collapse of building 1 and 2 looked entirely unlike building 7. So what exactly is the hallmark of controlled demolition? And what would uncontrolled collapse look like?
Mick, look at the film, you'll notice a building comes straight down in freefall into it's own footprint for no reason.
all three, building 7 is just so blatantly obvious its almost comical.And buildings 1 and 2 collapsed from the top down. Totally different. So which one was a controlled demolition?
Odd.....I've never seen (that I can remember) any controlled demo building start at the top (or close to the top) and work it's way down.
Odd.....I've never seen (that I can remember) any controlled demo building start at the top (or close to the top) and work it's way down.
Odd.....I've never seen (that I can remember) any controlled demo building start at the top (or close to the top) and work it's way down.
Sure you have, it happened on September 11, 2001, explosives can be placed at the bottom, the middle, and even at the top.
Sure you have, it happened on September 11, 2001, explosives can be placed at the bottom, the middle, and even at the top.
EDIT Silent explosives? Capable of taking out reinforced steal and concrete? Such things exist?
Sure they do. Thermite?
Thermite is:
A) Not really an explosive, it just burns very hot
B) Not used in controlled demolitions.
cheeple....and the lack of any recorded explosive noises as you hear at any other explosive demolition?
Lots of people heard the explosions including the firefighters.
OT Why are so many "references" U-tube vids? How about a link to a professional paper of some sort.
That they are lying, stupid, or mistaken. Or some combination, perhaps involving wild unfounded speculations.
That is you opinion and it is I think it is unevidenced speculation and a general ad hominiem(s).
No, it's the only three logical possibilities if they are wrong. If they are wrong, then what else could it be? I don't think they are joking.
We disagree, simple
But you would agree that those are the three options, right?
I am not really willing to get into a speculative ad hominem about a group of people I only found about yesterday.
I have no reason to assume that they are hoaxers, fools, stooges or anything other than what they claim.
If you believe, without question, the official story of what happened then then I don't really think we will find any common ground in this particular issue.
Without question?[ Actually I've questioned every aspect of it in great detail. I've also looked at every single objection that AE911 have raised.
My conclusion is that planes hit the building, the impact and explosion damage followed by the fire caused the buildings to collapse. I've gone over this many many time, answered many objections, and very carefully verified my facts.
What are you to make of all the experts who agree with the official story?
Surely if you are a truther (I'm not sure if you are or not), then you would also have to assume they were lying, stupid, or mistaken.
Mick, look at the film, you'll notice a building comes straight down in freefall into it's own footprint for no reason.
It took me a while to get here but I am utterly uninterested in the dogma fights between truthers and the officials - I am pretty sure the smart seeming people in the videos would agree to the futility of this.