Search results

So the TLEs that I gave you were as follows, highlighted is the 21295/21296, which ate the YY/DDD for that the Data is Valid for... For October 2021 day 296 is 23 Oct, so maybe a day out. @Mick West I'll get the TLE for the day after , ie 21297 = 24 Oct 2021 and attach it here in a moment.

Just trying to geolocate the excat location of the lasers... from these two sections of drone footage..... ... I think they are here... in the middle of the Skinwalker Ranch Triangle (sounds about right!). Which Google Maps gives the co-ords as 40.256992652439244, -109.89312718377975...

Yeah, to be honest I do think that the object disappears very quickly, almost too quickly for it to be going into the earth shadow compared to the other satellites I've seen do this, but when I found the CSS path and saw that it was entering the earth's shadow at that point I was happy to put...

TLE attached (for all Globalstars)

@travis TLE attached. Source: https://www.space-track.org/basicspacedata/query/class/gp_history/CREATION_DATE/2021-10-23--2021-10-24/orderby/NORAD_CAT_ID,EPOCH/format/3le/OBJECT_NAME/CSS~~

I think I had the time wrong, used the last saved metadata time rather than the created time. that puts the aircraft much further on in its flight and therefore unlikely to be Starlink flares.

Seems to be in the right place, right time, for Starlink flares (@Mick West - sitrec doesn't seem to be 1) showing the flare band and 2) showing flare-arrows when using the kml as the camera position source)

I've just seen this one... could it be Starlink again...? Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1csc0o6/ufo_spotted_on_flight_to_newark_nj/?share_id=lRVI-CHO_ZCPaxlTqji3T&utm_content=1&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_source=share&utm_term=1

Wow, nice find. Here they are together in the planetarium view:

A nice capture of Starlink satellites by this YouTuber... "StrangeNormal" https://www.youtube.com/@StrangeNormal Source: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/vkpD9MOpAAU Full video with commentary... Source: https://youtu.be/Dy8VETJqLCg?t=4919

Also there's a part in the video where the Pan and Tilt (elevation) angles for the camera are shown Pan (bearing) 346.8 degrees, and Tilt (Elevation) 83 degrees. That puts the camera pointing at the same point that the CSS satellite entered the earth's shadow.

Hey @jimmyslippin - I think I've identified the satellite. Looking at your video we can see that the UFO is moving in the direction of the arrow below: The direction of movement can then be put onto the annotated starmap, showing its path relativve to the consteallation Cygnus. It disappears...

yep, sorry, just found it and edited my post above. (cut & pasted below for thread consistency) edit. Found it. I think what the 9.31pm time indicates is the examination of the video in the HQ, not the time of the UAP appearance. I think that is earlier. And if the hypothesis that it's a...

@jimmyslippin you said... where is this in the YouTube video?

@Watcher nice post. The only thing I have to add is regarding the 'CRT Screen' hypothesis. I agree that the majority of the 'black and white disc UFO' is a wide angle CCTV feed seen on a CRT monitor, however the very last segment of the Kumburgaz video (from 17 May 2009) looks different to all...

I've added the source link to the FlightRadar24 playback. Can you check that it works for you?

Could have been either of these two. I dont think there's enough detail (shadows?) in the video to work out if the plane is flying N-S or W-E. Going on time alone, and proximity to the witness maybe the AerLingus one is more likely...

Yep, sounds very much like Starlink flares. I tried to join that Facebook group a few weeks ago but they were not accepting new members because of 'exceptional circumstances'.

Another NUFORC report from a plane that is almost certainly Starlink. Its hard to believe that these sightings are still being reported as 'ufos' in April 2024. https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=181256 N531AW is a BE200 , but unfortunately their ADSB data is hidden...

Hmm, something doest seem quite right to me here. At Frame 5623 (bottom right of next image) we can see the peak of Black Mountain on a camera bearing of 219, but the camera in sitrec seems to be on the reciprocal bearing of about 040. Here's the view above recreated in Google Earth for...