Tags:
  1. Z.W. Wolf

    Z.W. Wolf Active Member

    CBS News coverage of the international FE conference in Cary, North Carolina.

     
    • Informative Informative x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    Looks like a religious convention, and the birth of a new religion.

    I guess that's okay. There's no requirement on this earth to maintain rational thought. No reason why we can't all live in harmony.

    Peace. :)
     
  3. derwoodii

    derwoodii Senior Member

    i just ignore FE brethren as are too beyond my patience or time to bother with... I did begin my steps into debunking when found myself analyzing a Neil Adam Expanding earth youtube claim,,,, well sure a silly idea too but at least he thinks its a globe and not flat
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2017
  4. qed

    qed Senior Member

    Interestingly, the conference appears to have attracted mostly the very young. It is a conference of kids.
     
  5. Leifer

    Leifer Senior Member

    I usually place the FE ideas "on the side burner" so to speak.....I follow it a little bit, and watch it simmer.
    But in my kitchen analogy, more stoves are needed, because many hot pots keep getting added, as if they are all for a CT buffet. There's no charge for this buffet, but there is a cost.

    It's become "a thing", this whole group of "awakened" individuals and "truth seekers", where everything is a conspiracy.
    It's an organic mass growing on the internet, being dutifully nurtured by "group think".
    ....and I expect more to come.
    I still have the (personal) belief that there could be a foundation being created for some sort of futuristic new religion here, where social-media + (new) Truth + Google (top searches).... spawns a unique and absurd situation of A.I.
    A good percentage of them are already on the 2017 conspiracy-version of Christianity.

    And there's reasons why that could never happen....
    It could be that the very nature of CT thought, prevents it's overgrowth, because when anything gets super-organized, it eventually gets called a conspiracy (self regulating, or like a pressure-release valve).
    Evidence for this is the "in-fighting" among CT groups and between strongly opinionated and vocal individuals, which makes getting organized, difficult. In their world where "go with your gut instincts" and "idea-tossing", no man-made organization can exist within an architecture of "doubt everything".
    With no boundaries and limitations, it's run-amok.
    Science is a boundary for CTers, and that's why it's overlooked (or invented) a lot of the time......what-ifs in favor of what-is.

    Here's an article....
    "If a Scientific Conspiracy is Funny, That Doesn't Mean it's a Joke"
    10/09/17

     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2017
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Like Like x 2
  6. Tumeni

    Tumeni New Member

    Yeah, that works.

    Ignore the geiger counter altogether, and wander through Chernobyl to see if there's still any radiation there.
    Verify the presence or absence of microwaves by putting your head in the 750W oven at full power.
    Drink the water straight from the Ganges, just to see if those upstream have been washing their dirty laundry in it.

    Honestly, what could go wrong with that approach?
     
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2017
    • Like Like x 4
  7. Clouds Givemethewillies

    Clouds Givemethewillies Active Member

    There must be.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. DavidB66

    DavidB66 New Member

    I noticed a recent (19 November 2017) article by David Mitchell (the comedian and commentator, not the novelist) in the (UK) Observer newspaper (the Sunday version of the Guardian), prompted by the so-called Flat Earth International Conference. A link to the article is here: https://www.theguardian.com/comment...t-be-flat-but-it-is-possibly-doomed-fake-news
    There is nothing very unexpected or original in the article, but it is another sign (in addition to the BBC report which Mitchell mentions) that the FE 'movement' is beginning to attract mainstream attention. Some of the takeaway points from the article:
    "I don’t really think significant numbers are going to start doubting the Earth’s shape. What worries me is how, in this bewildering internet age, every fact, however apparently undeniable, has the potential to become a subject for debate...The recent explosion of weirdly unfocused scepticism is, I suppose, a natural response to this nasty internet-contaminated era...Unfortunately, this boundless doubting could take us right back to the stone age – and not in a time machine we’ve invented. The accumulation and advance of human learning, and therefore of civilisation, relies on things being written down and subsequently believed. It’s built on trust. A safety-first, unquestioning scepticism about absolutely everything could lead to the thoughtless discrediting, and chucking out, of huge swaths of our collective achievements. I don’t really know what we should do about it, but neither can I put a ceiling on how much it’s appropriate to worry."
     
  9. Tumeni

    Tumeni New Member

    What to do about the flat-earthers?

    Post on their forums, blogs etc. to correct them.
    Post on their YouTube videos to correct them.
    Turn up at their conventions to correct them.
    Gather a Union of Concerned Scientists (yes, I know there's one already) to attend their conventions, and correct them.

    That would do for a start.
     
  10. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    Finally, I met my first real life flat earthers yesterday
    Well, they were almost flat earthers
    In that they seemed to be heading that way
    And were repeating certain things about
    Not being able to trust scientists or NASA
    And figuring things out for themselves
    But what was most interesting
    Was that they weren’t of the
    Bible-believin’
    Youtube-gulpin’ strain
    But were coming at it from a
    “Wisdom of the indigenous” angle
    Being as they were Chilean hippies
    And into all that cactus-eatin’
    Dimension-explorin’
    Indian stuff
    Predisposed to thinkin’
    “They knew stuff, man
    Knew about the stars
    Despite their primitive technologies
    Knew stuff we’re only just figuring out
    And if they were right about that
    And right about the benefits of eating
    Mushrooms
    Vines
    Spiky plants
    Roots
    Who know what else
    They were right about?”
    I felt myself excited
    Ego bristling with the chance to
    Shoot down some ‘evidence’
    Show off some knowledge
    And set about it
    But you know what?
    It wasn’t fun
    It kind of sucked
    ‘Cos I’d already spent a lovely day with these people
    Lazing in hot springs
    Digging beautiful nature
    Eating a campfire dinner
    And they were nice and good
    And it felt daft talking about this stuff
    Their naïve and curious enthusiasm
    To try and figure out the puzzles
    And my short-sighted joy
    At knowing the right questions
    Having all the info
    To grinch holes in their bubbles
    Yet –
    How much sweeter
    To be gazing at the heavens
    And thinking
    “What if we really are floating on the back of a turtle
    And the ancient ones weren’t doolally?”
    Than being able to coldly point out the impossibilities
    Given the ISS and algebra and angles?
    Really I should have just asked them
    Which indigenous people it was
    And taken that as something for me
    To get curious about
    Answered a few qs
    And let them on their merry way
    And stayed sweet with the memory
    Of a wonderful day
    Being nice is more important
    Than being right
    Sharing connections with others
    Rather than points of division
    I mean, it wasn’t that there was anything wrong
    With the conversation
    But when it comes to issues of belief…
    It’s like that old saying
    About what not to talk about at dinner:
    Leave politics and religion aside
    And now:
    Probably conspiracy theories too
    Belief is not the heart and mind of a person
    And being right in logic
    Doesn’t necessarily make for
    The best dinner or hot springs companions
    Better to frolic with positive young
    Chilean hippies
    Or break bread with Rob Skiba
    Than with
    Dour old Landru
    For example

    From “What To Do About Flat Earthers, Part 9”
     
  11. Landru

    Landru Moderator Staff Member

    Dour?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  12. deirdre

    deirdre Moderator Staff Member

    is that your waxing poetic way of saying you are done with debunking flat earth?
     
  13. Inti

    Inti Active Member

    Speaking purely personally, I got into flat earth debunking a few years ago, when I felt jaded with arguing about climate change with global warming deniers. It was fun, but relatively inconsequential. I come back to it at odd moments, but I can't persuade myself that it matters more than the future of the world. That is not to critise those who do their bit to spread rational scepticism, and it does not have to be an either-or.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  14. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    Just going by your picture. And your words. ;)
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  15. Rory

    Rory Senior Member

    I wrote that three months ago; it seems even more true now. There's been very little flat earth discussion on metabunk of late, and I'm not aware of anything interesting happening on youtube, beyond Jeranism's failed attempt to work out whether a canal is curved or not.

    Is flat earth therefore in a new stage? Believers satisfied with the level of 'evidence' they currently have and perhaps consolidating and focusing on recruitment/revenue, and giving up on the 'holy grails' such as a flat earth map and something debunkers can't explain?

    Meanwhile, it seems like debunkers have understood all, devised explanations and demonstrations, and realised the futility of trying to persuade anyone, and therefore lost interest.

    What's next? Dwindle? Peak? Become relegated to the backburners of harmless fringe theories, like Victorian spiritualism - or, indeed, Victoian flat earthism?
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2018
  16. Mick West

    Mick West Administrator Staff Member

    Flat earth IS a Victorian phenomenon. All the significant parts of the theory date back to the 1860s.

    I don't see it tapering though, I think there was a flurry of activity months ago on Metabunk largely because I was going on the Joe Rogan show to talk about it, so I did some research. But there was just a Flat Earth Conference and Google Trends show no sign of decline. It's been essentially level (with spikes) for 2107

    Metabunk 2018-01-25 12-20-57.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1