1. TheoryQED

    TheoryQED New Member

    Hi I'm new here. I'm from Reddit and currently falling down the rabbit hole, particularly about UFOs. So I'd like to either escape it, or go as deep as possible. But don't worry, I'm not a believer for the sake of believing. I think believers are typically as bad as deniers, and both sides should always try to form their beliefs based on the evidence as much as possible. What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. And extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
    • Like Like x 1
  2. JohnP

    JohnP New Member

    Hello. I'm a JohnP, former chemical physicist and intermittent science fiction writer, who these days mostly treats science as a spectator sport. Problem-solving still intrigues me, and that is what brought me here.
  3. bill houston

    bill houston New Member

  4. Reto Streiff

    Reto Streiff New Member

    Grüezi / Hi everyone. I`m a new member but i know this forum for some years now. I`ve used some debunks for some arguments from my friends and family members. Please excuse some spelling mistakes, as English is not my native language. Due to my hobby as a planespotter and aviation enthusiast I am confronted a lot with the Chemtrails theory and 9/11.
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Nick Ramos

    Nick Ramos New Member

    Oh hi there! Long time lurker, first time posting here. Well, I'm quite into this world of pseudoscience and quackery debunking and mockery in general, mostly on my Twitch stream, in which I try my best to make fun of the absolute absurdity of some so-called arguments that permeate conspiracy theories. 9/11 "truthers", chemtrails, illuminati crap, antivaxxers, holocaust denialists, climate change denialists, woo woo "medicine"... you say it, I've probably laughed hard at them already. My motto is "castigat ridendo mores": Corrects customs laughing. I'm here to learn, understand arguments and enter the discussion with respect. I guess that's it for now, thanks for this amazing place!
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Traci Youngblood

    Traci Youngblood New Member

    I am very pleased to have stumbled upon this site. There are numerous platforms out there that seem to focus on opinion driven by emotion instead of opinion driven by facts or current evidence. I'm quite interested in delving into the various posts and reading them as this site appears to fall into the later by focusing on supportive evidence.

    Some of my interests include : reading declassified government documents, reading UN documents, reading bills that have been introduced into Congress (especially those that pertain to gun control issues ), and analyzing current events (mainly those that have the characteristics of a false-flag ).

    I am looking forward to participating in the discussions and reading the contributions made by others.
  7. Caractacus

    Caractacus New Member

    Hi Mick and Metabunk.

    Glad I found your very interesting site. I'm here mainly because my significant other is deep down the rabbit hole regarding many things - dedicated David Icke/Bruce Lipton follower, believer in HAARP/Chemtrails/9 11 Truther etc which has led us to some huge rows. I'm not necessarily interested in debunking her, because I'm not sure I can, but this year I have done a lot of research into Jungian psychology that I would love to discuss here because it seems that some personality types are much more likely to fall into these rabbit holes and it's important to understand how to deal with that. I'll save the rest for the thread I'm about to start.
  8. RenToo

    RenToo New Member

    Hi everybody. I've been in and out of various bunk-related sides all the way back to talk.origins days (remember that?) but hardly ever participated. Mostly I just like to learn things, appreciate good logical argument, maybe laugh at a bit of silliness. (So I avoid the really upsetting conspiracy theories such as Sandy Hook.) I have professional/academic experience in a couple areas of chemistry alongside longtime interest in a few other topics such as evolutionary biology (Stephen J Gould is my intellectual hero; Richard Dawkins is NOT) and rocketry. I've taught high school physics.

    I have a particular frustration with it when people who are trying to debunk something over-step into assertions they can't support -- at least if it's in an area I know enough about to know where the mistakes are. I've seen far fewer such issues here than I have in the past on debunking sites at large, which is appreciated.
  9. Mockingbird

    Mockingbird New Member

    Hi y'all I enjoy facts and truths more than confusion and lies. I found y'all by ways of looking up this organite for protection from 5g. And very grateful for y'alls clarity amen ✌