Video of hot steel bending

He still uses all those "Truther" words.... "Collapsed on itself", "pulverized to a fine powder", Freefall speed", "EJECTING the steel up to 600 feet", etc.

I never really thought about it before, but the "top block" of floors that "completely disintegrates", is probably still very intact as it starts into the bottom 95 floors, but it is the outside walls that are peeling away and sort of "hiding the top block as it falls and slowly disintegrates as it breaks the floors away from the walls.

I also wonder why they use the firefighters speaking of molten metal as proof, but then use these same firemen as the bad guys who "knew WTC was going to come down in advance and pulled back", or in the case of WTC7... Brought the building down at Silverstein's command.
 
He still uses all those "Truther" words.... "Collapsed on itself", "pulverized to a fine powder", Freefall speed", "EJECTING the steel up to 600 feet", etc.

I never really thought about it before, but the "top block" of floors that "completely disintegrates", is probably still very intact as it starts into the bottom 95 floors, but it is the outside walls that are peeling away and sort of "hiding the top block as it falls and slowly disintegrates as it breaks the floors away from the walls.

I also wonder why they use the firefighters speaking of molten metal as proof, but then use these same firemen as the bad guys who "knew WTC was going to come down in advance and pulled back", or in the case of WTC7... Brought the building down at Silverstein's command.

because circular logic is amazing
 
Unfortunately it just comes across as rather bizarre, especially if you've not seen the blacksmith video. He's trying to discredit the blacksmith, but makes his own point in exactly the same style, which suggests to the casual viewer that he think his own "the official story implies it's just air" explanation is just as silly as "jet fuel does not melt steel". It's all rather strange.

And it has indeed backfired a bit, the The Sun (a low quality British tabloid) reporting on his parody as if it were real. Gage failed to realize that most people are unfamiliar with what he's talking about.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...were-rigged-with-explosives.html?acs_cjd=true

The clip begins with an unidentified American man strolling into shot in a smart suit and tie.

He immediately announces that it’s “moronic” to believe that the 9/11 disaster was purely a result of planes crashing into the World Trade Centre.

While showing a video of the horrific terrorist attack, the man alleges that it’s “absurd” to believe that a strong steel structure could have collapsed without explosives.

...

Gesturing towards some grey-painted cardboard boxes, he said: “For the first time in history, three steel buildings collapsed because of fire”.

Even though he agrees that the buildings were hit by planes, he can’t accept that this was the reason for collapse.

The conspiracy believer is adamant that “the top 15 stories couldn’t do that”.
Content from External Source
 
Their pitch is inconsistent gobbledigook... It's laughable really and sad to see how many "intelligent" people have drunk their kool aid.
 
Back
Top