UK GOV FOI response to chemtrailsprojectuk.com "directive"

Would be nice if this ends it, but somehow I don't think we should hold our breath. (Pun unintended).

The first PDF from the UK government in response to the FOIR is dated 21 March 2014. Did it just now come out? (It's 0340, 27 March UTC at present)
 
Well if nothing else, this may might (did I actually write that?) be worthy of including into the "Max Bliss" thread? (Or another perhaps). Still, could be useful in future.
 
Last edited:
Wow. That's a pretty thorough response from the Dept. of Energy and Climate Change. Kudos to the civil servant who took the time to put it together.
 
I think it's a great response but I'd say the chances of this information satisfying the believers are about zero. It will be looked at as either evidence of a cover up or proof that the PTB has deceived the DECC.
 
Given that the people at CPUK are the same people that claim Mick has falsified old text books why would anyone think this would end things? I do wish the DECC would not have fudged things and rather than say "this is not our department" gotten in touch with the relevant ones to get all their questions answered, some of which are well balanced.
 
Wow. That's a pretty thorough response from the Dept. of Energy and Climate Change. Kudos to the civil servant who took the time to put it together.

Having been in a similar position, IMO it was probably the most interesting thing they did that day! :)
 
Despite the response(s) linked in the OP, there's a "big event" tomorrow

I wish to use this Bank Holiday to peacfuly raise awareness and Publicly Reject Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP. and Agenda 21.. We are suffering the affects of this diabolical silent war here in the U.K, and around the world more than we have seen in previous Years. We will be meeting in Hyde park speakers corner @11:30 then moving on to Richmond terrace , opposite Downing street for 14:00 where we will be handing in our petition , and a copy of the directive to number 10 @ 3pm (please see links below ) ..
Content from External Source
https://www.facebook.com/events/1386327821635283/
 
Despite the response(s) linked in the OP, there's a "big event" tomorrow

I wish to use this Bank Holiday to peacfuly raise awareness and Publicly Reject Geoengineering, Chemtrails, HAARP. and Agenda 21.. We are suffering the affects of this diabolical silent war here in the U.K, and around the world more than we have seen in previous Years. We will be meeting in Hyde park speakers corner @11:30 then moving on to Richmond terrace , opposite Downing street for 14:00 where we will be handing in our petition , and a copy of the directive to number 10 @ 3pm (please see links below ) ..
Content from External Source
https://www.facebook.com/events/1386327821635283/

The spelling mistakes smack of amateur level.

Will this even be taken seriously?
 
Ok question.. if he wants to Publicly Reject.. etcetcetcetc.. is that saying he thinks its BS, or am I reading it wrong? The rest of that notice seems to indicate he believes in it and wants to raise awareness, not reject the notions of same.
 
tbh, I've not fully read it all but a quick glance at their directive makes interesting reading.


We therefore demand the Government of the United Kingdom take the following actions:

  1. To fully inform the Wider General public of the United Kingdom about all atmospheric aerosol injection and spraying programmes – whether they are weather modification, geoengineering activities, experimental, testing or otherwise – and to explain why such activities are being allowed to take place in UK airspace without our fully informed permission or consent.
  2. Granting of independent and government investigations of aerial spraying, including aircraft inspection and regulation of aircraft, aircraft fuel and aircraft emissions.
  3. To advance the UN moratorium with the banning and cessation of climate geoengineering, weather modification, cloud seeding and the deliberate aerial spraying of chemical aerosols that occur in UK airspace without the permission and consent of the majority of the wider general public.
  4. To ensure any solar radiation management technique may only be reconsidered after a public debate on anthropogenic global warming and all forms of geoengineering (including solar radiation management and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering) has been conducted and concluded, with leading, independent figures from each side of the argument involved throughout.
  5. To end the military’s ability to exempt itself from all treaties that govern our health and wellbeing, such as:
    • The 1989 Official Secrets Act, 1978 Environmental Modification Treaty (ENMOD)
    • The Nuremburg Code
    • The UN Nagoya Convention on Biological Diversity, 2001
    • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights The UNECE Aarhus Convention
    • Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001
    • Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union
    • The Unified Atmospheric Preservation Act (UAPA).
  6. To bring the Unified Atmospheric Preservation Act (UAPA) into law.
Content from External Source
Without putting too finer point on it, it could be quite a clever move, in a scatter-gun sort of approach.
3, 4 & 5 are interesting, dependant on future outcomes.
 
To fully inform the Wider General public of the United Kingdom about all atmospheric aerosol injection and spraying programmes – whether they are weather modification, geoengineering activities, experimental, testing or otherwise – and to explain why such activities are being allowed to take place in UK airspace without our fully informed permission or consent.

Thats actually not a bad idea.. Most of the rest of it is batshit crazy/uninformed, but that very first point there isnt a bad.
 
The CT community make very little mention that there is public consultation going on. This paper makes for an interesting read http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs/Climate change/Stratospherics/spice public views.pdf and was part of a wider consultation around the SPICE project, the idea of having a balloon thethered 1km up and spraying water and further examples of public engagement here http://www.handsoffmotherearth.org/hose-experiment/spice-opposition-letter/

Organisations like Friends of the Earth have as policy statements that research needs to be done in proposals but the main objective needs to be carbon reduction. The issue for the CT community is that they are trapped in a rather small bubble and they do not seem to engage with the wider environmental protection community. Mind you when they do they railroad the discussion.
 
Back
Top