WTC7 Penthouse Falling Window Wave

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I was just scrubbing over some WTC7 collapse video when I noticed something new to me. When the East penthouse falls though the building it creates a visible wave on the windows, presumable as they are twisted or pushed out somehow by the changes in pressure. The scale of the pressure is also visible by the smoke being sucked in at the top of the building.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wf1HcJ7GKsc

WTC7 Window Wave Loop - YouTube 2018-01-07 13-37-09.png
This is relevant because it appears to show the East Penthouse falling rapidly though the building, which is consistent with a collapse of C79/80/81 at a low level, well before the other columns failed.

I think some people, like @Tony Szamboti, have suggested that the East Penthouse actually only fell in a few floors, and that lower interior column failures were simultaneous, but this seems at odds with that.

You can kind of see this in the more familiar footage on the right, but the angle and lighting are not perfect, and there's more obscures.

Contrast has been adjusted individually on all three videos.

Here's the full collapse at real-time with all three videos synced.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6x7UnTnHy7Q

Here it is synced with the NIST model, you can see the Penthouse debris in red.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tPbom7CVC8
 
Last edited:

DasKleineTeilchen

Active Member
When the East penthouse falls though the building it creates a visible wave on the windows
ha! honestly, I also saw this a few weeks ago in a WTC7-thread here when someone posted the dan-rather(?)-video from cbs (the same as in your video) and thought making a video about, but was under the impression it would be already known. and pure lazyness of course. well, that will teach me
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
under the impression it would be already known
Me too, I've been looking for where other people noticed it. So far I've found this, regarding the "Leaning Camera" footage:
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/7_WTC.html
The "Penthouse free fall" link is a broken youtube. It's also linked from:
 

econ41

Senior Member
If my memory is correct femr2 and associates on The911Forum did a fair amount of analysis of "waves" of varying reflectivity and therefore the probable causes. Certainly femr2 set the standard as "go to guy" on motion analysis from videos. May not be the easiest material to locate - I haven't looked.

(And anyone searching that forum be aware that its mission was and is "...to bring together sincere researchers, irrespective of creed, for constructive dialog and collaboration on 9/11 issues." So in today's language it was and is "truther friendly" in contrast with the then JREF forum from which it was a "break-away")
 
Last edited:

benthamitemetric

Senior Member
Tony last brought up his five-point limited penthouse collapse theory on metabunk in the UAF study discussion thread

What others here may not tell you is that while the vertical kink in the east penthouse does point to a failure of column 79 it only tells you it failed below the penthouse, not where that failure occurred. Interestingly, the evidence shows the east penthouse only came down into the main building a couple of stories which would indicate that column 79 only failed high in the building. The points of evidence for this are

1. Daylight can only be observed through the windows of the top story.
2. The shock wave goes top to bottom.
3. Window breakage only occurs from the roofline down 15 stories.
4. There is no exterior column deformation observed on the east side as there would be if lateral support was lost.
5. There is no dust emanating from windows on the east side until the exterior starts coming down and the east penthouse dropped into the building 6 to 7 seconds before that.

What this also means is that all 24 core columns were still intact for most of their height after the east penthouse fell. To cause a simultaneous drop of all four walls of the building, as observed, all 24 core columns would have to be pulled nearly simultaneously starting in the center a fraction of a second earlier.

A reason the east penthouse might have been taken down separately first is that it was eccentrically located in the northeast corner. The screen wall and west penthouse, which also sat on the roof, were located in the center of the 144 foot wide building.

Of course, this situation is a lot more plausible and would explain the observations much better than the Rube Goldberg situation that NIST and some others are trying to feed us. Several years after the release of the NIST WTC 7 report, when the drawings were released, it was found that NIST needed to deceptively ignore, omit, and distort several pertinent structural features to even make it have any plausibility. Their analysis looks and sounds like a classic cover-up, where things don't naturally add up and the situation is then contrived.
I responded to each point in the next post, and he didn't have a substantive response after that. As I noted, it is clear that the totality of the visible window breakage on the northern face of the building is inconsistent with Tony's theory that the collapse of the penthouse was a discrete, pre-collapse event. Mick's focus on the actual progression of the window breakage/distortion here makes that even clearer.

Tony's bizarre and indefensible theory re the penthouse collapse isn't so bizarre (though it is indefensible) when you realize he is simply trying to rationalize his continued belief in the occurrence of a controlled demolition of the building despite the fact that he has realized (and even admitted in his own words) that the so-called free fall period of the descent of the northern face of the building could occur as a result of a buckling of the exterior columns of the building if the interior columns had already collapsed. Of course, if he recognized the penthouse collapse for what it was (the beginning of the collapse of the interior columns), he would then be forced to recognize, based on his own stated understanding of the ability of the the so-called free fall period of the northern face to occur absent the interior columns, that the so-called free fall period of the northern face is not evidence of a controlled demolition, which runs counter to everything he and AE911Truth have argued for a decade or so. And so he is forced to rationalize an absurd, just-so theory about how the penthouse collapse can't possibly be the collapse of the inner columns.

Truthers, if you aren't convinced by Tony's flimsy arguments for the notion that the collapse of the penthouse was some sort of discrete, pre-collapse event, then congratulations! Thanks to Tony's helpful observation that the free fall period could occur via a buckling of the exterior columns, you can now understand that the observed collapse of WTC7 was entirely consistent with a progressive collapse as a result of fire. Welcome back to reality.
 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
If my memory is correct femr2 and associates on The911Forum did a fair amount of analysis of "waves" of varying reflectivity and therefore the probable causes. Certainly femr2 set the standard as "go to guy" on motion analysis from videos. May not be the easiest material to locate - I haven't looked.
Aha, back in 2009:
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/the911forum/wtc-7-vertical-shockwave-progression-t201.html


Hmm, now that I see femr2's video I think I must have seen it before, forgotten it, then independently rediscovered it :)
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bx2Kx2AkXEg



femr2 commented a couople of years later in the thread:
Then the usual suspects weigh in.
 

econ41

Senior Member
It may help your research Mick.

By "over there" femr2 will be referring to JREF where for several years he steadfastly maintained his own integrity and support of his work against the prevailing climate. I think you are probably aware of the JREF "climate" and personality conflict issues that led to the establishment of The911Forum.

I'll leave you free to chat with Tony.
 

Jeffrey Orling

Senior Member
femr2 was careful to use the phrase low down in the building... because the bottom is eclipsed by buildings in the foreground. But his analysis seemed to strongly support the notion that the collapse of the EPH traveled down thru the visible height of the north facade... and was not a local event up top as Tony claims.
 
If columns 79, 80 and 81 failed near the bottom as NIST posits, then there would be no shock wave as every floor would be falling at the same time.
 

benthamitemetric

Senior Member
If columns 79, 80 and 81 failed near the bottom as NIST posits, then there would be no shock wave as every floor would be falling at the same time.
It’s not really a shockwave. It’s just visible deformation. And it is happening all along the face at once from the outset, not just in a top down manner, even though the final downward ripple of deformation is relatively pronounced.
 
It’s not really a shockwave. It’s just visible deformation. And it is happening all along the face at once from the outset, not just in a top down manner, even though the final downward ripple of deformation is relatively pronounced.
I was referring to the collapse of the EPH, not the whole building.

A failure of the columns under the EPH near the bottom of the building would not create a shock wave or deformation from the top down as we can see in the video because all the floors from the top to the bottom would be falling from simultaneously. Therefore, the deformation would also be on every floor simultaneously.

The top down shock wave or deformation is what would happen if the EPH and the machinery it contained were to
impact the 47th floor.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
The top down shock wave or deformation is what would happen if the EPH and the machinery it contained were to
impact the 47th floor.
Why? That makes no sense. Why would the penthouse stop after ten floors? What is in this wave, and why does it proceed down the face of a building in a blob?

It looks more like the penthouse just fell through all the visible floors, accelerating as it goes. (why would a wave accelerate?)
 
Why? That makes no sense. Why would the penthouse stop after ten floors? What is in this wave, and why does it proceed down the face of a building in a blob?

It looks more like the penthouse just fell through all the visible floors, accelerating as it goes. (why would a wave accelerate?)
The EPH stopped falling at the 47th floor (one floor, not ten) as is evidenced by light coming thru a few windows on the 47th floor but none of the floors below that. Had the EPH and its contents fallen further, there would have been light coming thru windows on those floors too. The wave is therefore a shock wave. The wave does not accelerate that I can see. That would take a frame by frame analysis to say for sure.
 

benthamitemetric

Senior Member
I was referring to the collapse of the EPH, not the whole building.

A failure of the columns under the EPH near the bottom of the building would not create a shock wave or deformation from the top down as we can see in the video because all the floors from the top to the bottom would be falling from simultaneously. Therefore, the deformation would also be on every floor simultaneously.

The top down shock wave or deformation is what would happen if the EPH and the machinery it contained were to
impact the 47th floor.
Why does visible deformation occur at the bottom of the visible portion of the north face simultaneously with the penthouse falling through the roof line? This deformation precedes the arrival of the top-down "ripple" of deformation that subsequently moves down across the north face of the building. You can see it if you watch the full length collapse in real time that Mick previously posted above. This deformation is wildly inconsistent with a theory that the penthouse collapse event was localized to only the top floors of the building.

And can you articulate with more specificity why you think the downward ripple of deformation that appears to roughly follow the passage of the penthouse through the roof line is impossible in NIST's scenario? What exactly is causing that deformation in your theory? If you note that the whole face was undergoing a complex series of deformations from the outset of the penthouse collapse as I showed you above, its continued deformation in an increasingly pronounced way doesn't strike me as strange or inexplicable; in fact, it looks largely consistent with the NIST computer simulation of how debris moved through the building in a chaotic way after column 79 buckled. In the animation NIST provided, the penthouse debris does not simply fall cleanly to the ground; it hits various remaining portions of the structure on the way down, causing further damage.

The EPH stopped falling at the 47th floor (one floor, not ten) as is evidenced by light coming thru a few windows on the 47th floor but none of the floors below that. Had the EPH and its contents fallen further, there would have been light coming thru windows on those floors too. The wave is therefore a shock wave. The wave does not accelerate that I can see. That would take a frame by frame analysis to say for sure.
Re the light coming through the windows, can you, in reference to a certain camera angle, specify exactly where and when you'd expect to see more light if NIST's scenario were broadly true?
 
Last edited:

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
The EPH stopped falling at the 47th floor (one floor, not ten) as is evidenced by light coming thru a few windows on the 47th floor but none of the floors below that. Had the EPH and its contents fallen further, there would have been light coming thru windows on those floors too.
You can only see the light in a few of the upper windows because you can look up through the hole to see the sky.

The wave is therefore a shock wave.
What does that mean? A "shock" wave? What is the physical nature of the propagation of this wave? What do you propose is actually happening?
 

Oystein

Senior Member
...
Re the light coming through the windows, can you, in reference to a certain camera angle, specify exactly where and when you'd expect to see more light if NIST's scenario were broadly true?
Exactly. I have not yet seen an actual analysis of this, just a bare claim that blue sky should be visible through more than just the windows of the two top floors. That analysis would have to recreate the geometry of the relevamt lines of sight - distance of camera to foot of window, distance from the third-highest floor to the roof line, depth of the building, etc.

This has not been done, afaik.
 

econ41

Senior Member
The EPH stopped falling at the 47th floor (one floor, not ten) as is evidenced ....
What would stop it once it got moving?

Sure - enjoy debating the details such as light paths through windows BUT dont miss the issues of dubious base premises.

What Christopher 7 is proposing is repeating the same errors of T Szamboti's "Missing Jolt" twisted a bit and translated to the WTC7 scenario. "Missing Jolt" wrongly assumed a false start premise and went looking for a jolt that never could have occurred. The Twin Towers Top Blocks started moving and there was nothing to stop them. The actual mechanism understood by some and still misunderstood by many BUT the TB did not stop because the mechanism of the collapse had no way of stopping it.

At WTC 7 the EPH started falling. What could stop it? Can anyone explain how it could stop? Without repeating the errors which were repeated ad nauseam in discussion of MJ?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Exactly. I have not yet seen an actual analysis of this, just a bare claim that blue sky should be visible through more than just the windows of the two top floors. That analysis would have to recreate the geometry of the relevamt lines of sight - distance of camera to foot of window, distance from the third-highest floor to the roof line, depth of the building, etc.

This has not been done, afaik.
I took a bash at it:

3d Recreation in Sketchup - SketchUp Make 2017 2018-01-09 16-34-40.jpg

3d Recreation in Sketchup - SketchUp Make 2017 2018-01-09 16-41-44.jpg

3d Recreation in Sketchup - SketchUp Make 2017 2018-01-09 16-36-00.jpg

3d Recreation in Sketchup - SketchUp Make 2017 2018-01-09 16-38-13.jpg

Roughly the line of sight does not really go through the roof, it almost entirely goes through the east wall. Apparent if we view it in X-ray mode:

3d Recreation in Sketchup - SketchUp Make 2017 2018-01-09 16-46-01.jpg

(Note this is an approximate positioning of the other buildings, as the ones I downloaded seemed to be slightly off in size, however I think it's very close for line-of-sight through the windows).
 
Why does visible deformation occur at the bottom of the visible portion of the north face simultaneously with the penthouse falling through the roof line? … This deformation is wildly inconsistent with a theory that the penthouse collapse event was localized to only the top floors of the building.
A couple windows on the 40th floor (not at the bottom of the visible part of the building) go dark before the shock wave gets there. I have no explanation for that. However, if the columns failed at the lower floors then there would be windows going dark all up and down the face.

And can you articulate with more specificity why you think the downward ripple of deformation that appears to roughly follow the passage of the penthouse through the roof line is impossible in NIST's scenario?
Not impossible. However, if the interior columns failed near the bottom of the building, there would be simultaneous distortions from bottom to top as every floor would be pulling inward on the exterior wall (unevenly). A ripple starting at the top was cause by an event up there.

In the animation NIST provided, the penthouse debris does not simply fall cleanly to the ground; it hits various remaining portions of the structure on the way down, causing further damage.
I find that part reasonable.

It is possible to see light thru the windows even when there is not a direct line of sight to the sky the same as we can see the building even thought there is no sunlight hitting it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

John85

Member
I was just scrubbing over some WTC7 collapse video when I noticed something new to me. When the East penthouse falls though the building it creates a visible wave on the windows, presumable as they are twisted or pushed out somehow by the changes in pressure. The scale of the pressure is also visible by the smoke being sucked in at the top of the building.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wf1HcJ7GKsc

This is relevant because it appears to show the East Penthouse falling rapidly though the building, which is consistent with a collapse of C79/80/81 at a low level, well before the other columns failed.
Have you measured what speed the wave is moving at?

Any idea what the cause of the wave might be? Looking at the NIST model, nothing jumps out that seems to account for it. At the start of their model, the column under the penthouse simply buckles, and all floors attached to it descend at the same time.

Does a similar wave appear before the collapse of the remainder of the building?

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNEKtvB80us
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Any idea what the cause of the wave might be? Looking at the NIST model, nothing jumps out that seems to account for it.
Doesn't this falling red area of similar size to the falling "wave" kind of jump out?
WTC7 Penthouse Falling Window Wave | Metabunk 2018-01-10 05-19-20.jpg

It's the penthouse, of course. but perhaps more importantly it's the top of the interior collapse, which you might view a a kind of top heavy piston. I suspect the cause of the wave is just air pressure moving the windows outwards changing their reflection angle a bit.
 

benthamitemetric

Senior Member
“Why does visible deformation occur at the bottom of the visible portion of the north face simultaneously with the penthouse falling through the roof line? … This deformation is wildly inconsistent with a theory that the penthouse collapse event was localized to only the top floors of the building.”

A couple windows on the 40th floor (not at the bottom of the visible part of the building) go dark before the shock wave gets there. I have no explanation for that. However, if the columns failed at the lower floors then there would be windows going dark all up and down the face.
I think you should watch the video more carefully at around the 4 second mark (maybe try rapidly pausing and unpausing). Between 4 and 7 seconds, there are significant visible distortions on the bottom left side of the visible face of the building. These distortions are most apparent in both the middle and left angles. Perhaps some one who is more technically savvy than I can isolate and slowdown the time frame in question, but I think the distortion I'm describing is readily apparent in the video even at its regular speed. The bottom line is that something was happening in the building along the entirety of the visible portion eastern side of its north face from the very outset of the visible collapse of the penthouse.

“And can you articulate with more specificity why you think the downward ripple of deformation that appears to roughly follow the passage of the penthouse through the roof line is impossible in NIST's scenario?”

Not impossible. However, if the interior columns failed near the bottom of the building, there would be simultaneous distortions from bottom to top as every floor would be pulling inward on the exterior wall (unevenly). A ripple starting at the top was cause by an event up there.
It looks to me like there were simultaneous distortions throughout the face, though they were not necessarily as pronounced as the distortions in the final ripple. I'm not sure what conclusion should be drawn from that. I think Mick's theory that the final top-down ripple was largely caused by air displaced by the debris seem plausible, and the demonstration he made in the post directly above lends some additional credence to the ripple being related to the top of the falling debris wave (and the NIST report having the motion of that debris generally correct). It also seems plausible that some portions of the distortion were caused by other aspects of the internal collapse (falling debris coming into contact with the face or un-collapsed elements still connected thereto, the moment frame redistributing loads rapidly, etc.).

“In the animation NIST provided, the penthouse debris does not simply fall cleanly to the ground; it hits various remaining portions of the structure on the way down, causing further damage.”

I find that part reasonable.
Ok, great.

It is possible to see light thru the windows even when there is not a direct line of sight to the sky the same as we can see the building even thought there is no sunlight hitting it.
I don't think this is really responsive to my request or really a helpful to get us to a framework from which we can analyze whether the visible light in the extant video is consistent or inconsistent with NIST's theory. Can you please choose a video frame of reference as Mick has done and provide a more detailed explanation of your point in reference thereto?
 

Jeffrey Orling

Senior Member
If columns 79, 80 and 81 failed near the bottom as NIST posits, then there would be no shock wave as every floor would be falling at the same time.
Each floor section was supported axially by columns... but they slabs were connected laterally to adjacent and initially unaffected columns. there for there was resistance at each floor level... Or.... maybe the mass at the top just smashed thru one floor at a time when it lost partial axial support.
 

derwoodii

Senior Member.
I notice that small & partial window wave is just seen descending before the roof of the penthouse machine room roof and walls begin to fall down & inwards.. I'd suspect heavy plant equipment is on its way down though the fire & impact weakened floors adding & creating structure failure and initiating the full penthouse collapse.
 
I think you should watch the video more carefully at around the 4 second mark (maybe try rapidly pausing and unpausing). Between 4 and 7 seconds, there are significant visible distortions on the bottom left side of the visible face of the building. These distortions are most apparent in both the middle and left angles. Perhaps some one who is more technically savvy than I can isolate and slowdown the time frame in question, but I think the distortion I'm describing is readily apparent in the video even at its regular speed. The bottom line is that something was happening in the building along the entirety of the visible portion eastern side of its north face from the very outset of the visible collapse of the penthouse.



It looks to me like there were simultaneous distortions throughout the face, though they were not necessarily as pronounced as the distortions in the final ripple. I'm not sure what conclusion should be drawn from that. I think Mick's theory that the final top-down ripple was largely caused by air displaced by the debris seem plausible, and the demonstration he made in the post directly above lends some additional credence to the ripple being related to the top of the falling debris wave (and the NIST report having the motion of that debris generally correct). It also seems plausible that some portions of the distortion were caused by other aspects of the internal collapse (falling debris coming into contact with the face or un-collapsed elements still connected thereto, the moment frame redistributing loads rapidly, etc.).



Ok, great.



I don't think this is really responsive to my request or really a helpful to get us to a framework from which we can analyze whether the visible light in the extant video is consistent or inconsistent with NIST's theory. Can you please choose a video frame of reference as Mick has done and provide a more detailed explanation of your point in reference thereto?
There is no other video that I know of that shows the light coming thru the windows on the 47th floor. However, I occurred to me that if the EPH and its contents fell past the 47th floor we would be seeing light thru all the windows on that floor. The reason we don't is because there's a pile of debris blocking the light.
 

benthamitemetric

Senior Member
There is no other video that I know of that shows the light coming thru the windows on the 47th floor. However, I occurred to me that if the EPH and its contents fell past the 47th floor we would be seeing light thru all the windows on that floor. The reason we don't is because there's a pile of debris blocking the light.
The sunlight is coming from the southwest and the western mechanical penthouse is still standing at the moment in question. Looks to me like that's why you don't see a few windows completely brighten on the east side of the north face on the 47th floor, though it looks to me like there is a visible brightening of all such windows. Just rewatch Mick's loop and you can see the relationship between the western mechanical penthouse and the shadow across such windows pretty clearly as the western penthouse itself succumbs to the progressive collapse just moments before the northern face begins the rapid phase of its descent:

 

John85

Member
Doesn't this falling red area of similar size to the falling "wave" kind of jump out?

It's the penthouse, of course. but perhaps more importantly it's the top of the interior collapse, which you might view a a kind of top heavy piston. I suspect the cause of the wave is just air pressure moving the windows outwards changing their reflection angle a bit.
It's not plausible that a falling section of penthouse would cause window deflections, while 30+ falling floor assemblies would not.
 

John85

Member
There just isn't enough damage happening to the outside of the building to reflect 30+ stories falling together.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
If it acted as a piston, I would also expect to see bursts of pulverized concrete explode out the windows, as happened in WTC 1 & 2
No, it's a totally different situation. In WTC1/2 the "piston" was slamming down though intact entire floors, so the air had nowhere to go.

In WTC7 the floors had already collapse, and it was only partial, so the air could go both down, sideways, and out the back (south side, where there were many broken windows)
Monosnap 2018-01-11 13-19-59.jpg
 
The sunlight is coming from the southwest and the western mechanical penthouse is still standing at the moment in question. Looks to me like that's why you don't see a few windows completely brighten on the east side of the north face on the 47th floor, though it looks to me like there is a visible brightening of all such windows. Just rewatch Mick's loop and you can see the relationship between the western mechanical penthouse and the shadow across such windows pretty clearly as the western penthouse itself succumbs to the progressive collapse just moments before the northern face begins the rapid phase of its descent:

You are right about the screenwall shading the east end up to column 44. I did the research and the calculations. However, I contend that we would see defuse light thru windows at least a few stories down if the east end had hollowed out but I guess we will just have to agree to disagree on that point. Furthermore, I don't see the "visible brightening of all such windows" that you see.

I would also argue that the 4 windows to the right of the 2 that show sunlight have debris piled in front of them but not enough to block them completely.

In any case, this has been an interesting and informative discussion. Thank you.
 
Perhaps you could give a timestamped screengrab of the simulation-synced video, showing where and when you think there should be these deflections
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tPbom7CVC8
At this point column 79 has descended about 20', pulling the girder between 79 and 44 and all the floors downward. There should be deflections in the north wall all along column 44 as it is pulled inward. The exterior walls have little strength in the horizontal plane perpendicular to them.

 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West WTC7 Smoke Movement Before and After Penthouse Collapse 9/11 7
Oystein Final Report: Hulsey/AE911Truth's WTC7 Study 9/11 24
Joe Hill WTC7: Does This "Look Like" a Controlled Implosion? 9/11 45
Mick West TFTRH #25 - Jason Bermas: Producer of Loose Change, Shade, Invisible Empire Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast 1
Oystein Debunked: AE911T: CNBC Anchor Ron Insana claims Building 7 a Controlled Implosion 9/11 13
Mick West Sept 3, 2019 release of Hulsey's WTC7 draft report: Analysis 9/11 183
Pepijn van Erp WTC7: Determining the Accelerations involved - Methods and Accuracy 9/11 41
Mick West A wider perspective on the WTC7 collapse 9/11 2
Mick West Some New-ish WTC7 Photos (and video?) Corner Damage 9/11 6
Mick West Debunked: NIST's Lack of Explanation for WTC7 Freefall [They Have One - Column Buckling] 9/11 38
Jedo Debunked: WTC7 was the only building not on the WTC block that had a fire on 9/11 9/11 0
Mick West WTC7 South Side Photos 9/11 2
John85 How could the interior collapse in WTC7 Move West Without More Visible Exterior Damage 9/11 63
Mick West WTC7: Is AE911's (and NIST's) Focus on A2001 Justified if it Was Not "Key" in NIST's Global Model? 9/11 181
Jeffrey Orling The Role of Diesel Fuel in WTC7 9/11 12
Mick West First Interstate Tower Fire - Comparison with WTC Towers and WTC7 9/11 5
Mick West Kai Kostack's WTC7 Collapse Simulation using BCB and Blender 9/11 10
Mick West Have You Actually READ the NIST Report on Building 7? 9/11 12
Mick West How Hot Could The WTC7 Fires Burned, and How Hot could the Steel be? 9/11 2
gerrycan Did NIST examine Steel from WTC7? 9/11 16
gerrycan Movement of Column 79 as Expressed in WTC7 UAF Presentation 9/11 13
Mick West Debunked: UAF Study Shows WTC7 Could Not Have Collapsed from Fire 9/11 43
Mick West Debunked: CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: ‘We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11’ [HOAX] 9/11 12
Whitebeard Tehran Plasco Highrise Fire And Collapse - 9/11 WTC7, WTC1&2 Comparisons 9/11 84
Cube Radio What is this woman hearing as WTC7 collapses behind her 9/11 40
Mick West How Buckling Led to "Free Fall" acceleration for part of WTC7's Collapse. 9/11 127
benthamitemetric Other WTC7 Investigations: Aegis Insurance v. 7 World Trade Company Expert Reports 9/11 39
Oystein Debunked: "WTC7 Sound Evidence of Explosions" by Chandler/AE911T 9/11 31
Oystein AE911 Truth's WTC7 Evaluation Computer Modelling Project 9/11 1340
Cube Radio Sulfur at WTC7: how could it come from gypsum as the BBC claimed? 9/11 75
jaydeehess Why little to no analysis of steel from WTC7? 9/11 45
gerrycan AE911 Letter to Inspector General Claims NIST WTC7 Report is Provably False 9/11 161
Ron J WTC7 Firefighting 9/11 48
gerrycan WTC7 - Can YOU Spot The Difference? 9/11 52
Cairenn The plausibility of demolishing WTC7 with explosives on 9/11 9/11 429
Oxymoron How much of the Smoke Around WTC7 actually from WTC7? 9/11 20
Mick West What would a new WTC7 Collapse Investigation look like? 9/11 127
mynym WTC7 and other Buildings, the Significance of Sheer Studs 9/11 1
Representative Press WTC7 Fire Temperatures and effects on the East Floor System 9/11 58
Representative Press Significance of WTC7 9/11 36
ColtCabana FDNY Chief Daniel Nigro's statement on WTC7 9/11 135
gerrycan Critical Errors and Omissions in WTC7 Report Uncovered 9/11 841
Alchemist How could WTC7 Possible have fallen like it did? 9/11 319
Josh Heuer The Uniqueness of the WTC7 Collapse 9/11 528
Oxymoron WTC4 fire photo labeled as WTC7 on 911 memorial timeline site. 9/11 60
Mick West Debunked: WTC7 vs. Chechnya's Tallest Building Fire (Grozny-City Complex) 9/11 24
Mick West Does NIST not testing for explosives and not testing WTC7 steel invalidate everything 9/11 246
Mick West Debunked: AE911Truth's WTC7 Explosive Demolition Hypothesis 9/11 175
Tazmanian Debunked: 9/11 Melted cars near WTC7 9/11 79
Oxymoron WTC7: Did the fires burn long and hot enough? 9/11 340
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top