Why was the US code changed to make human experimentation illegal? Chemtrails?

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
I have to admit the single issue that galvanized my suspicion that some type of Chemtrail activity was possible was Congressional testimony and the US Code . . . sure human experimentation occurred . . . what made it stop?? Once behavior is uncovered, admitted to reluctantly, and laws changed in and around 1997 to prevent it in the future . . . should we believe this type of activity is over and done with from now on????
 

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
George Washington was a slave owner. Slavery was abolished. Once that behavior was changed by law in 1863 to prevent it in the future . . . should we believe this type of activity is over and done with from now on, or should we forever suspect that all Presidents keep slaves?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I think the 1997 change in the law was a specific response to something to do with the First Gulf War, possibly experimental vaccines being given to soldiers without their consent. Or possibly as a response to certain type of accusations surrounding Gulf War Illness.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
For reference, here's the current law:

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-105publ85/html/PLAW-105publ85.htm
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
I think the 1997 change in the law was a specific response to something to do with the First Gulf War, possibly experimental vaccines being given to soldiers without their consent. Or possibly as a response to certain type of accusations surrounding Gulf War Illness.
It may have been part of the reasons; however, to establish the motivation of Congress requires an understanding of a legislative timeline, testimony, public comment etc . . . I do know there was much angry testimony regarding the Zinc Cadmium Sulfide injections around 1995 . . .
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member

Old code . . . .

 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
Much investigating was ongoing . . .

 

David Fraser

Senior Member.
That law does not make it illegal it just ensures that there is informed consent by any subject. I don't see how this could be related to chemtrails in any way.
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
Here is the Gulf War connection . . .

 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
That law does not make it illegal it just ensures that there is informed consent by any subject. I don't see how this could be related to chemtrails in any way.
So evidence supporting the lack of trust in the Government because of past covert human experimentation is not germane to a discussion about the suspicion the government may conduct said covert experimentation again . . . ??? Hmmmm . . .
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
George Washington was a slave owner. Slavery was abolished. Once that behavior was changed by law in 1863 to prevent it in the future . . . should we believe this type of activity is over and done with from now on, or should we forever suspect that all Presidents keep slaves?

Maybe not the US President but slavery is still alive and well throughout the world is it not? Including sex slavery in our own country . . . all quite illegal . . .
 

MikeC

Closed Account
It may have been part of the reasons; however, to establish the motivation of Congress requires an understanding of a legislative timeline, testimony, public comment etc . . . I do know there was much angry testimony regarding the Zinc Cadmium Sulfide injections around 1995 . . .

ZCdS was "sprayed" from aircraft IIRC - not injected?
 

David Fraser

Senior Member.
Here is the Gulf War connection . . .


I think the Gulf War is irrelevent as the military are exempted from that law.
 

David Fraser

Senior Member.
So evidence supporting the lack of trust in the Government because of past covert human experimentation is not germane to a discussion about the suspicion the government may conduct said covert experimentation again . . . ??? Hmmmm . . .

So what you are saying is that at a time a government starts spraying they also at a legaslative means to challenge it? That makes no sense.

I am not denying the past btw, and I don't trust my own government in the UK.
 

MikeC

Closed Account
The military being exempt doesn't stop the information and hearings being a catalyst to a law change - even if the law change then does not affect the military.

The 1990's saw a lot of US experimentation become public knowledge - not all of it was by or on the military - but the GW circumstances were part and parcel of that increasing knowledge.
 

David Fraser

Senior Member.
The military being exempt doesn't stop the information and hearings being a catalyst to a law change - even if the law change then does not affect the military.

The 1990's saw a lot of US experimentation become public knowledge - not all of it was by or on the military - but the GW circumstances were part and parcel of that increasing knowledge.

You are correct and I apologise. However I do have intimate knowledge of Gulf War Syndrome, especially as it affected us in the UK. I don't believe the US or UK government issued troops with medication as an experiment. I truly believe they did it in good faith. Please take into context I am in the UK but I get a little angry that GWS is brought into the chemtrail debate. I am part of a group that to this day fights for our rights as the UK don't recognise it.
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
I think the Gulf War is irrelevent as the military are exempted from that law.
My post was in response to Micks post about the law change he felt was motivated somewhat because of the Gulf War testimony, but thanks for pointing out that military members are usually exempt from civilian protections . . .
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
So what you are saying is that at a time a government starts spraying they also at a legaslative means to challenge it? That makes no sense.

I am not denying the past btw, and I don't trust my own government in the UK.
No, it is a recognition that in an enterprise as large, complex and segmented as the US Government the right hand may not know what the left hand is doing . . .
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
The military being exempt doesn't stop the information and hearings being a catalyst to a law change - even if the law change then does not affect the military.

The 1990's saw a lot of US experimentation become public knowledge - not all of it was by or on the military - but the GW circumstances were part and parcel of that increasing knowledge.
I don't disagree . . .
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
You are correct and I apologise. However I do have intimate knowledge of Gulf War Syndrome, especially as it affected us in the UK. I don't believe the US or UK government issued troops with medication as an experiment. I truly believe they did it in good faith. Please take into context I am in the UK but I get a little angry that GWS is brought into the chemtrail debate. I am part of a group that to this day fights for our rights as the UK don't recognise it.
Good intentions for actions does not guarantee good outcomes . . . the world is full of such history . . . it just makes it a bit easier to explain why you took the action in the first place. The potential/suspected causes of GWS was for the most part not covert in nature but extremely difficult to prove, much like the Agent Orange Program, Ranch Hand in Vietnam . . .
 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member
By-the-way, just to clarify . . . I did not choose the Thread Title . . . it is Mick's creation . . . I would not have thrown in Chemtrails . . .
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
By-the-way, just to clarify . . . I did not choose the Thread Title . . . it is Mick's creation . . . I would not have thrown in Chemtrails . . .

Sorry, but that's by far the most common connection made between this 1997 change in the law, and some nefarious intent.

That law does not make it illegal it just ensures that there is informed consent by any subject. I don't see how this could be related to chemtrails in any way.

The law starts out making it illegal as the default position:

It then provides some exceptions that require informed consent.

I also don't see how it's related to chemtrails. However it (or the older version of the law) have been brought up as evidence of chemtrails literally thousands of times.

https://www.google.com/search?q="public+law"+chemtrails

 
Last edited:

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
I also don't see how it's related to chemtrails. However it (or the older version of the law) have been brought up as evidence of chemtrails literally thousands of times.

It is brought up because the chemtrais hoax never could stand on its own.

Like the handicapped might need mobility aids, the double-amputeed chemtrails hoax has always had to free-ride on suspicion, distrust, jealousy and fear mongering, or any other issue which could attract someone. Just as Michael J. Murphy hitched onto weather modification, hatred for Bill Gates and Monsanto, everything possible is "connected" to give it a hand-up.
 
Did you see this loophole?
Section 1515 of Chapter 32 allows informed consent to be suspended by executive order during a period of national emergency.
(https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1515)

And apparently we've been in a state of national emergency since about 1979:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/10/22/president-obama-states-of-emergency/16851775/

upload_2016-6-2_20-5-56.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MikeC

Closed Account
And.........are you suggesting that one or more of the current SOE's negates the ban??

If so which?

If not....then ...OK...thanks for pointing it out.
 
Sorry, I'm new at posting on this site. It was in response mostly to the post above about:
ON THE USE OF HUMAN
SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS.
Basically, it's good-to-go at any time, as long as "participants" give informed consent. HOWEVER (due to this loophole), informed consent is not mandatory if we are classified as in a State of Emergency. And then I found out that, well, basically, we are perpetually in a SOE!
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Sorry, I'm new at posting on this site. It was in response mostly to the post above about:
ON THE USE OF HUMAN
SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS.
Basically, it's good-to-go at any time, as long as "participants" give informed consent. HOWEVER (due to this loophole), informed consent is not mandatory if we are classified as in a State of Emergency. And then I found out that, well, basically, we are perpetually in a SOE!

No, it's just that Title 50, Chapter 32 MAY be suspended during war or SOE, it is not automatically suspended, nor has it been suspended.
 

JRBids

Senior Member.
I guess that is why I see so many people post "I do not consent!" on Facebook? I wonder if they believe that would work.
 

AumuA

New Member
I think that usually has to do with consenting to be searched. And it's true, that many police searches happen because people roll over and say ok under the pressure.
 

JRBids

Senior Member.
I think that usually has to do with consenting to be searched. And it's true, that many police searches happen because people roll over and say ok under the pressure.
I thought police searches happened because someone may have committed a crime.
 

qed

Senior Member
I thought police searches happened because someone may have committed a crime.

https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/when-can-the-police-stop-and-frisk-you-on-the-street

You guys live in utopia. In South Africa we are randomly stopped and searched.
http://www.corruptionwatch.org.za/dont-be-intimidated-by-police-know-your-rights/
 

JRBids

Senior Member.
I agree with you qed. Frankly the bellyaching I hear from my fellow Americans about how awful our country is I find ridiculous.
 

David Fraser

Senior Member.
I thought police searches happened because someone may have committed a crime.
Do you not have stop and search in the US? I have been stopped a few times when walking to or from work in the early hours. All was down to my size and my appearance.

The police have been known to step of the mark and target blacks etc.
 

AumuA

New Member
I thought police searches happened because someone may have committed a crime.

Yeah, that they do. However, in the U.S. "someone may have committed a crime" is not probable cause for searching that person. I agree 100% that we do have it good here, and that we should be grateful for the rights we have, and we should understand what those rights are. I guess this is off topic?
 

JRBids

Senior Member.
Do you not have stop and search in the US? I have been stopped a few times when walking to or from work in the early hours. All was down to my size and my appearance.

The police have been known to step of the mark and target blacks etc.

The are supposed to have reasonable suspicion

I was in London in the early 80s. I had walked down embassy row with a friend and I had my camera and took a photo, which you apparently are not supposed to do. There was a policeman at the end of the street and he stopped me and asked me to give him my camera and I asked him why and he said he was going to take the film out. I said no, I had been to Stonehenge the day before and had my photos in there. So he said you can't take a photo here, I saw you on the camera, give me your film... I said no again. So he said something about calling someone, and turned around into his box to make the call and we ran around the corner and left. :rolleyes:
 

Whitebeard

Senior Member.
I was in London in the early 80s. I had walked down embassy row with a friend and I had my camera and took a photo, which you apparently are not supposed to do. There was a policeman at the end of the street and he stopped me and asked me to give him my camera and I asked him why and he said he was going to take the film out. I said no, I had been to Stonehenge the day before and had my photos in there. So he said you can't take a photo here, I saw you on the camera, give me your film... I said no again. So he said something about calling someone, and turned around into his box to make the call and we ran around the corner and left.
There are strange by-laws in London about what buildings you can and can't photograph, most embassies, most government depart offices are off limits, so strangely are the houses of parliament (and Portcullis house next door) and even Buckingham Palace! (although the last two are rarely enforced, musn't offend the tourists, we need their mullah :) ) Weirdest one is the MI6 building, people have been stopped taking photographs of it, even AFTER it had featured in a couple on Bond film and several other films and popular TV dramas (like Spooks)
 

Efftup

Senior Member.
There are strange by-laws in London about what buildings you can and can't photograph, most embassies, most government depart offices are off limits, so strangely are the houses of parliament (and Portcullis house next door) and even Buckingham Palace! (although the last two are rarely enforced, musn't offend the tourists, we need their mullah :) ) Weirdest one is the MI6 building, people have been stopped taking photographs of it, even AFTER it had featured in a couple on Bond film and several other films and popular TV dramas (like Spooks)
Well common sense never does apply to most bureaucracies. Or prisons. If you are in a UK prison, they won't let you wear say a pair of Army boots cos the toecaps are reinforced, but if the prison you are in has you doing almost ANY type of manual work you will be issued with steel toecapped safety boots which you are meant to wear back to your cell.
Or you can find a D Cat (open ) prison like HMP Leyhill where if you are in the music group you are not allowed access to a screwdriver and a spanner or pair of pliers under supervision of the outside music teacher to tighten the nuts on an amp or a strat copy ( for security reasons) but if you are in farms and gardens. you will be wandering around with an AXE on your shoulder and no-one bats an eyelid.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Decoded: Statue with a QR code head UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 26
Mick West How To Embed CodePen (Interactive Javascript code and animations) How To 2
George B WTC: Were the buildings up to code? 9/11 126
Trailblazer Explained: "Human-shaped cloud above Zambian shopping centre" [Photoshop, kite] UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 5
MikeC Jet fuel damages human cells - study Health and Quackery 16
sgirl Restaurant Caught Serving Human General Discussion 16
deejay Scientific paper stating airborne barium releases 'responsible' for human illness Contrails and Chemtrails 164
Truthseeker007 Theory: Use of "chemtrails" to destroy the human immune system Contrails and Chemtrails 32
Cairenn Cost in Human Lives of the War on Terror General Discussion 35
David Fraser They study Human Engineering for Climate Change. Conspiracy Theories 0
BlueCollarCritic THE UNITED NATIONS & Dyncorp Human Trafficking Cover Up Conspiracy Theories 1
tryblinking Alleged timeline of human experimentation by USA. Conspiracy Theories 9
Pete Tar Emoto's water crystal formations illustrate alleged effect of human intent on matter. UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
Mick West Debunked: Human Birdwings - Hoax. UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 11
Mick West Debunked: Human Protection Software Suite Science and Pseudoscience 29
Mick West Debunked: Human Magnets UFOs, Aliens, Monsters, and the Paranormal 0

Related Articles

Top