# Which Plane is Higher? Optical Illusions in Assessing Relative Altitude

#### Mick West

Staff member
Which of these two planes is higher? And where are they exactly, relative to each other?

Now your first impression might be that it's fairly obviously plane B, on the right. It's visibly smaller than the left plane, so must be farther away, and its contrail is obscured by plane A the left plane's contrail, so that means the left plane is closer, right?

Wrong. The right plane is actually the one that is closer. It's actually less than half the distance away, and 4,000 feet lower.

The key here is that the aircraft are very different in size. The plane on the left , United Flight 6, is a 777-224(ER) length 209 feet, whereas the plane on the right, Alaska 682, is a 737-990, length 138 feet, or just 66% the length of the 777.

There's a variety of illusions here. For one, even though the plane on the right looks smaller, it's actually visually longer in this photo.

This matches the position and relative sizes. The right plane is the 737, 2/3 the length, but half the distance, so actually 4/3 the visual length. It looks smaller in the wider shot because the angle of the wings is more straight on, and it has a narrower body.

Another clue here's the patch of shadow on plane B's contrail.
https://www.metabunk.org/sk/20150216-152137-j8rn2.jpg
There are no other contrails or clouds in the area, so the only thing that can be leaving this shadow is plane A's contrail, so it has to be above plane B.

So why does Plane A's contrail look like it's obscuring plane B's contrail where they visually cross? That's another illusion. White contrails consist only of white light, they are not blocking any light. By our brains interpret the darker regions of the contrail as something that is blocking the light, when really it's just a hole that you can see the sky through. So it does not matter which contrail is above or below, the result is the same. This is explained in more detail here:

Still not convinced? Have a look at this photo from a few seconds earlier:

Here plane B is clearly underneath plane A's contrail, even though its contrail seems to be above, proving the optical illusion.

The full set of images can be found here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/metabunk/sets/72157648533061393/

And the Google Earth tracks of both planes are attached, which demonstrate the crossing angle in quite nicely:

A final illusion here is that the planes both appear (to some people) to be in quite steep descents. But in reality that's just perspective. The planes are both flying perfectly horizontal. The viewpoint is very close to the intersection, so the camera is looking up at it, which gives the apparent angles.

#### Attachments

• FlightAware_UAL6_RJAA_KIAH_20150216.kml
45.3 KB · Views: 795
• FlightAware_ASA482_KSEA_KLAX_20150216.kml
13.5 KB · Views: 962
Last edited:

#### Auldy

##### Senior Member.
Fantastic demonstration of some of the common illusions that may confuse people and lead to misunderstandings. Thanks Mick.

#### Mick West

Staff member
Thanks, and I just edited it to add a couple more.

#### WeedWhacker

##### Senior Member
antastic demonstration of some of the common illusions that may confuse people and lead to misunderstandings.

YES, indeed. Fully agree (because? I "HOPE" this doesn't ruin the thread....BUT? Pilots can see contrails from "multiple" altitudes....(not just from the surface of the Earth!!).

The 'depth of perspective' matters...meaning, a contrail can be viewed from "ground level, of course....but ALSO from another airplane....at whatever altitude....so a viewing of a contrail can be "relevant" to the observer's position. WHICH (of course) relates to MANY old videos, easily found on YouTube of WW2 contrails!! So, this remains a "constant" in terms of a fact. "(about)" contrails!

CONTRAILS are real.....

"chemtrails" are NOT "real".....

#### Auldy

##### Senior Member.
...Pilots can see contrails from "multiple" altitudes....(not just from the surface of the Earth!!)....

Yes, I think the only way you could make this post better (however impossible) is that you had footage/photos from the cockpits of planes A and B as the trails traversed or from planes viewing the same example at varying altitudes nearby. Time to stick a goPro on the nose of every plane then?

#### Hama Neggs

##### Senior Member.
I think it's mainly because plane A's contrail is wider. That makes it look closer.

#### Mick West

Staff member
I think it's mainly because plane A's contrail is wider. That makes it look closer.

Yes, that leads to the impression that Plane A is bigger, hence closer. Looking at the side by side, there's quite a dramatic difference both in the visual spacing of the engines, and the initial size of the contrails.

The Plane A (777) contrails were also more persistent. Generally the higher plane is more likely to have more persistent contrails, but of course that's not something the average person takes into account. Instead, more persistence just makes the trail bigger, and hence it feels closer.

#### Mick West

Staff member
People inevitable bring up the Father Ted "Small, or Far Away?" sketch in discussions of perspective. I'd advise against this, as the premise of the sketch is mocking a mentally challenged person who does not understand perspective.

In this case though, and in most cases involving planes, contrails, and perspective, the errors in in perception are perfectly understandable, and to be expected. The focus should not be on poking fun at people, but on trying to cleary explain what the illusion is, and why we all fall for it.

After all, plane A does look closer, and there's very little in the scene to suggest otherwise. The planes look like they cross quite close to each other, when they are many miles apart. We all initially misinterpret what we are seeing here.

#### WeedWhacker

##### Senior Member
Yes, I think the only way you could make this post better (however impossible) is that you had footage/photos from the cockpits of planes A and B

Yes, true....and can be found via numerous YouTube videos. There are a great many examples, filmed ("videoed"?) from airliner and other jet cockpits....ALL easily researched.

I will not post such a video....I think they are readily available already in the MB database history...

#### SR1419

##### Senior Member.
Nice job. Its something I ponder almost every time I see more than one plane and/or contrail.

Its almost impossible not to literally lose perspective when looking up at the sky. Its so hard to really tell anything about height and distance but our land lubber status tries its feeble best to coordinate...and our hubris lets us think we know.

I would love to see a time lapse cross-cut of the sky showing wind/cloud patterns, temp changes/movements, traffic etc...

#### Auldy

##### Senior Member.
Yes, true....and can be found via numerous YouTube videos. There are a great many examples, filmed ("videoed"?) from airliner and other jet cockpits....ALL easily researched.

I will not post such a video....I think they are readily available already in the MB database history...

Yes I know that, I was aiming more along the lines of congregating all these resources together. But that would require huge pre-planning/luck. Flightaware, Google Earth, footage/photos from the ground and then footage/photos from the actual planes or aircraft nearby. Then it would need to be the right conditions for the formation of contrails and THEN they would need to traverse... hurts my brain just imagining the logistics.

#### Hama Neggs

##### Senior Member.
People inevitable bring up the Father Ted "Small, or Far Away?" sketch in discussions of perspective. I'd advise against this, as the premise of the sketch is mocking a mentally challenged person who does not understand perspective.

In this case though, and in most cases involving planes, contrails, and perspective, the errors in in perception are perfectly understandable, and to be expected. The focus should not be on poking fun at people, but on trying to cleary explain what the illusion is, and why we all fall for it.

After all, plane A does look closer, and there's very little in the scene to suggest otherwise. The planes look like they cross quite close to each other, when they are many miles apart. We all initially misinterpret what we are seeing here.

I like to use the analogy of the sun appearing to orbit Earth once a day.

#### Trailspotter

##### Senior Member.
Yes, that leads to the impression that Plane A is bigger, hence closer. Looking at the side by side, there's quite a dramatic difference both in the visual spacing of the engines, and the initial size of the contrails.

The Plane A (777) contrails were also more persistent. Generally the higher plane is more likely to have more persistent contrails, but of course that's not something the average person takes into account. Instead, more persistence just makes the trail bigger, and hence it feels closer.

Here is a recent photo of two planes of different sizes viewed at the side by side (captured by Alan Bushell):
Interestingly, in this case the smaller A330 is actually higher at 36,000 ft than the bigger B747 flying at 30,000 ft. The A330 length of 63.7 m is about 90% of the B747 length of 70.6 m, but it looks extra 10% smaller in the photo being farther away from the camera.

#### Attachments

• FlightAware_PHBFC_EHAM_MMMX_20150209.kml
70.4 KB · Views: 740
• FlightAware_CGHKX_EDDM_CYYZ_20150209.kml
69.2 KB · Views: 776
Last edited:

#### WeedWhacker

##### Senior Member
I like to use the analogy of the sun appearing to orbit Earth once a day.

Of course that is a perception...(mistaken, as we know). But still a good analogy.

(PS: you may enjoy this video series: 'Testing Geocentrism - Part 1")

At least...I hope you enjoy it!

#### JFDee

##### Senior Member.
This is annother exhibit that I came across on FB. Unfortunately, I couldn't find the original source yet.

My take is that the plane at 'the front' is a Boeing 737-300 or something in that class, and the one 'behind' is a Boeing 767-400 or similar - which is much larger in comparison and therefore must be considerably higher than the other plane.

It also looks like the second plane is creating the trail.

#### Mick West

Staff member
Some useful size comparison images:

#### Mick West

Staff member
Worth noting that there can also be a lot of variation within a single plane type, like the 777,

or A340:

#### Trailspotter

##### Senior Member.
This is annother exhibit that I came across on FB. Unfortunately, I couldn't find the original source yet.

My take is that the plane at 'the front' is a Boeing 737-300 or something in that class, and the one 'behind' is a Boeing 767-400 or similar - which is much larger in comparison and therefore must be considerably higher than the other plane.

It also looks like the second plane is creating the trail.

I remember seeing it at Chemtrails Project UK photos. There was a series, starting with this:
There is also a picture in the comment to the above link showing the two planes aligned at practically the same position in the sky:

I think that the original source of these pictures was a video. I have a vague recollection of seeing it on flickr, but I can't find the link at the present.

#### Spectrar Ghost

##### Senior Member.
This is annother exhibit that I came across on FB. Unfortunately, I couldn't find the original source yet.

My take is that the plane at 'the front' is a Boeing 737-300 or something in that class, and the one 'behind' is a Boeing 767-400 or similar - which is much larger in comparison and therefore must be considerably higher than the other plane.

It also looks like the second plane is creating the trail.

The front plane looks like an A320 variant to me, but that doesn't really change your conclusions.

#### Mick West

Staff member
I remember seeing it at Chemtrails Project UK photos. There was a series, starting with this:
There is also a picture in the comment to the above link showing the two planes aligned at practically the same position in the sky:

I think that the original source of these pictures was a video. I have a vague recollection of seeing it on flickr, but I can't find the link at the present.

There's a full thread on these photos:

#### JFDee

##### Senior Member.
There's a full thread on these photos:
Ah, I thought that the image was somehow familiar ... but Google's image search did not bring it up, even when combined with "site:metabunk.org".

#### WeedWhacker

##### Senior Member
Worth noting that there can also be a lot of variation within a single plane type, like the 777

THAT (^^^) is an important...a very important point. This is something that people familiar with aviation understand almost intuitively.

Unfortunately, many who are so-called 'amateur' plane-spotters? Might not be fully well-aware of these subtle variations, and this can lead to misconceptions of course.

Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Needs debunking: Pentagon plane could have been shot down 9/11 10
Shape-Changing Light From Plane with Nikon P900 - Polarizing filter + Venus? Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 61
Video of all FAA mandated aircraft lights? Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 7
Claim that the Nimitz FLIR1 object could not be a plane because it would have been Identified UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 54
UFO Seen From Plane over Mexico March 19, 2020. Venus? (NARCAP TR 20) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 8
Skinwalker Ranch Episode 4 UFO - Just a Plane? Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 2
Solved: MUFON Case 105762 - White Cigar "Following" Plane near Zion Nation Park (United 541) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 9
Air Force E-11A Communications Aircraft Crashes And Burns In Afghanistan Current Events 7
Bright Light that "goes from the ocean to the clouds" [Plane] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 1
Plane Shaped "Drone" Caught on Camera. Mead, NE - Cessna Caravan? Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 7
Ukrainian Plane Crashes in Flames in Tehran - Shot Down By Iran's IRGC Current Events 43
Clinton's Flights on Epstein's Plane, the "Lolita Express", did not go to the Island Conspiracy Theories 2
Unusual Light Track in Long Exposures, Grand Canyon Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 38
Strange Row of Lights Under a Plane? Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 42
Simulating the Nimitz UFO video as a blurry plane UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 51
Explained: video of concentric circular "chemtrails" (E-3 Sentry AWACS plane, Feb 1 2019) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 3
1980s Cheadle staffordshire: Plane or UFO? Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 13
Maui Optical Tracking Facility Five Lights UFO. [Plane + Slow Camera] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 16
Plane Image on Google Maps in Cambodia - MH370 Speculation Flight MH370 10
Red Winged UFO, Mufon case 91964 - Plane Lights Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 34
Plane Flies in Front of Super Blue Blood Moon Eclipse Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 1
Plane Making a Ripple Across the Sun Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 7
Lights over Sacramento - Just a Plane, But what's that Beam? Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
'Strange' Flight Path on FR24 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 10
Explained: Why a Spirit Level on a Plane Does Not Show Curvature "Corrections" Flat Earth 98
A Plane Flying Across the Face of the Sun, with Contrails [Virgin Flight 353] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 7
Flight 93 Crash Physics - Fragmented Plane Buried in the Ground 9/11 10
Debunked: Cargo Plane Carrying "Nukes" to Korea [French Air Display] General Discussion 5
Black line in sky seen from plane (contrail?) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 2
Another photographic anomaly [Long exposure of plane lights] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 2
Where did the third trail go? Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 5
Strange looking plane Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 8
Mystery Plane over Newcastle Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 14
Identified: "Mystery Plane" Circling Over Denver, IRON99 [E-6B Mercury TACAMO] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 13
P900 Plane and Contrails Photos and Video Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 17
Claim: Hillary’s Brain Injury Caused By ‘Near Fatal Plane Crash’ Conspiracy Theories 9
"UFOs" from plane over Chicago Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 3
Lost Plane? [G-OSRA Oil Spill Response B727 Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 14
Claim: Indigogo campaign to recreate 9/11 Plane Crash into Building 9/11 38
Explained: Video of plane leaving "6 chemtrails, then 2" [Mixed Exhaust and Aerodynamic Contrails] Contrails and Chemtrails 6
Identifying a plane over San Francisco [B99988 - Gulfstream GL650] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 20
NASA502 GLF3 Earthquake Survey Plane leaves giant curving contrails again Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 12
ExpressJet Plane Leaking Fuel From the Wing Contrails and Chemtrails 0
Akron Ohio Plane Crash General Discussion 4
Sinai Plane Crash - Metrojet 9268 General Discussion 89
MH17 Missile/Plane Intersection Simulation Flight MH17 23
Unidentified plane heading towards Sacramento [E-6 TACAMO] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 16
Plane with Vertical Black Stripes Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 25
Help to ID a plane? [N90 - FAA Flight Inspection Aircraft] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 30
Identified: Chemtrails Project UK's "chemtrail plane" (Air France A340) Contrails and Chemtrails 2
Related Articles