What should we rename "Fortean phenomena"?

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
"Fortean phenomena" is probably not that meaningful a title to most people. I'd like to rename it so people understand what it is. Something like:

  1. Aliens and Paranormal
  2. UFOs and The Unexplained
  3. Weird Stuff
  4. Aliens, UFOs, and the Paranormal
Any suggestions?
 

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
First vote is for 1 with 2 coming in close behind. Weird stuff is too broad and the last seems a bit redundant because UFO and Aliens fall in the same category.
 

SR1419

Senior Member.
I think "Paranormal" needs to be in there as its a common and yet enticing term to a lot of people...so, #1 or #4.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
what about bigfoot, cupacabra and Nessie? they aren't paranormal either. "The X files: UFOs and other such stuff" ?
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
don't you have enough room to put "Fortean Phenomenon: Aliens, Paranormal, (creatures) etc.

so people can learn the term fortean at the same time?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Shouldn't "UFO's" technically have a spot in the Skydentify section anyway?

Yeah, there's a little overlap. But Skydentify for looking at very specific cases. It covers contrails as well, which are also discussed in the Contrails/Chemtrails forum.

I'm thinking about a tag system, so people can discover groups of content in various ways - not just within the label of a particular forum.

For example, you might want to see all the experiments that people have done, but they are spread across multiple forums (Like: burning snow, building a model of the WTC, crushing cans, making astrolobe, etc).
 

jonnyH

Senior Member.
what about bigfoot, cupacabra and Nessie? they aren't paranormal either.
"Aliens, monsters and the paranormal"?

or perhaps "Anomalous Phenomena" as thats what the field pioneered by Charles Fort was called before his followers started calling themselves Forteans, though it isn't very descriptive.
 

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
On the main forums page, could it be made to show the names of the sub forums without having to hover over the icon to see them? Leave the Fortean as the main title but have sub forums for Aliens, Monsters and such.

Example from a game forum I use. The sub forums for each profession are visible.
3457654.jpg
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
On the main forums page, could it be made to show the names of the sub forums without having to hover over the icon to see them? Leave the Fortean as the main title but have sub forums for Aliens, Monsters and such.

Example from a game forum I use. The sub forums for each profession are visible.
View attachment 8282

I had it like that once, but the Xenforo display of sub-forums is not as nice at Vbulletin. I'll see if this has changed.

I've also added a "tags", which may remove some of the need for sub-forums (especially in the less well travelled forums)
 

Josh Heuer

Active Member
i don't know what anomalous phenomena means. doesn't sound like ghosts or monsters. just sounds like ESP and Northern lights type stuff.

It's just a more standard version of describing Fortean phenomena. Anomalous - anomaly. Something out of the ordinary. Like I said, pretty much covers all of what is being looked at. Can't really get much more succinct, without actually using the term 'Fortean'
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
It's just a more standard version of describing Fortean phenomena. Anomalous - anomaly. Something out of the ordinary. Like I said, pretty much covers all of what is being looked at. Can't really get much more succinct, without actually using the term 'Fortean'
thanks. was wondering who made ups such a weird word like Fortean. thought it was a star trek thing or something.

edit. yea not sure ghosty people really think of them as anomalies. I like AMP.
 

Josh Heuer

Active Member
thanks. was wondering who made ups such a weird word like Fortean. thought it was a star trek thing or something.
Haha, I'm pretty sure a certain few people here would have been all over it, cracking jokes and making references that us non-Trekkies (or is it Trekkers? Or what?) would have been lost on.
 

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
Debunking specific claims of evidence should take place in forums with specific name titles.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Debunking specific claims of evidence should take place in forums with specific name titles.

Yeah, but the question is HOW specific. We don't need Fortean -> Cryptozoology -> Cryptid Hominid -> Bigfoot.

I'm thinking the tags will be more useful there.
 

Soulfly

Banned
Banned
Yeah, but the question is HOW specific. We don't need Fortean -> Cryptozoology -> Cryptid Hominid -> Bigfoot.

I'm thinking the tags will be more useful there.
Works for new posts, old ones wont have tags unless you go back and tag them. Sub-forums, you could just search thread titles and then just move them into that forum. A lot easier than trying to tag old threads. Don't need a sub-forum for every different topic. Just more specific name(s).
 

Josh Heuer

Active Member
Or just 'Anomalistics.' It's what Charles Fort was into, and where Fortean was from.

I mean, aliens, ghosts, UFOs, Bigfoot, telekinesis, quantum hoo-ha, they all fit in this category. It's broad but straight to the point.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
Or just 'Anomalistics.' It's what Charles Fort was into, and where Fortean was from.

I mean, aliens, ghosts, UFOs, Bigfoot, telekinesis, quantum hoo-ha, they all fit in this category. It's broad but straight to the point.
Anomalistics sounds like a band that has a bag pipe player.
 

deirdre

Senior Member.
Haha, I'm pretty sure a certain few people here would have been all over it, cracking jokes and making references that us non-Trekkies (or is it Trekkers? Or what?) would have been lost on.
maybe they have. and we just don't know. still cant figure out what that dolphin clip @WeedWhacker keeps posting has to do with anything. : )
 

Bill

Senior Member.
I favor something like UFOs, Cryptids and the Paranormal. Listing UFOs and aliens seems redundant.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
deirdre Climate Scientist says "Scientists should consider stretching the truth": Stephen Schneider Quotes Debunked 2
R How much blood should there be here? Boston Marathon Bombings 7
H2meloen Clouds formed when they should not? Contrails and Chemtrails 52
Mick West Attached images should now appear in quotes. Site Feedback & News 4
Mick West hotmail and live.com emails should work now Site Feedback & News 0
George B Should there be a Conspiracy Forum Rating System. General Discussion 35
FuzzyUK Probiotic foods - should you be consuming them? Health and Quackery 14
MikeC This 777 should be identifiable for a year or 2..... Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 0
Clock "They’ll warn that tyranny is always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices. Quotes Debunked 96
Oxymoron Poll: Should the U.S Attack Syria? General Discussion 51
Marcus Mudd A Debunking site should open the possibility of debunking the paradigm Site Feedback & News 28
David Fraser Should we debunk "hoax" tragedies with "crisis actors"? Practical Debunking 21
Mick West Links to old posts should be fixed Site Feedback & News 6
Clock Poll: Do you think that threads should be closed after being debunked? Site Feedback & News 6
Mick West I don't think you should tell people they are ignorant. Practical Debunking 15
Mick West Debunked: "we should have stopped the nuclear program of Israel" ... JFK Quotes Debunked 24
Mick West Debunking Sites you Should Check First Practical Debunking 3
deirdre Obama Moves To Rename Thanksgiving To ‘Immigrants Day' General Discussion 0

Related Articles

Top