UK chemtrails conference,December,London

HappyMonday

Moderator
Just spotted this in a post here -

http://www.ishtarsgate.com/forum/sh...emtrail-activity-in-the-USA&p=19201#post19201

"THE LONDON CHEMTRAILS AWARENESS CONFERENCE - FRIDAY 14th DEC , 2012. 2pm - 5pm , at THE LONDON LIGHTHOUSE (111 -117 LANCASTER RD, Ladbroke Grove. W11. (1 min from Ladbroke Grove Tube station, Hammersmith & City Line)
An opportunity to see presentations connecting evidence of Chemtrails, Geoengineering and much more.
NOW is the time to DISSOLVE DENIAL & TAKE ACTION."

I think this is connected to Chemtrails Project UK.

Work precludes my attendance,which is a shame. I'd love to meet these guys.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
More info:

https://www.facebook.com/events/135221503291539/permalink/137261883087501/

Maybe you could pop into The Tabernacle?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Looks more like a small gathering than a conference. The LA Skywatch people frequently have these at a local cafe, but I've never been.

I did go to the large conference, which was quite productive. Sometimes things got a little heated, but I never felt like I was in any danger, most people were very polite. Still, one should exercise caution when interacting with people who potentially think you are part of a plot of kill billions of people.
 

Fred259

New Member
Goodness.... this is a sign of a very broken society.


Contrails will always be around the capital. Its a “hot city” Do you explain anywhere on the forum or Contrail Science the concept that heat generated from the city will modify the lapse rate towards the unstable.


Also ram rise sat/tat??
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Contrails will always be around the capital. Its a “hot city” Do you explain anywhere on the forum or Contrail Science the concept that heat generated from the city will modify the lapse rate towards the unstable.

I don't think that London being a hot city has anything to do with the amount of contrails over London. That's mostly do do with the amount of traffic over the region.

The air at 35,000 feet is constantly changing (generally by being blowing to the south east), and by the time heat from London reaches that altitude, it's going to be miles away from the city, and lost in the general noise levels.

Plus, have a look at this - contrails that seem to be "over" a city are usually 20-100 miles away:

http://contrailscience.com/how-far-away-is-that-contrail/

This photo from the "conference" page:


Is likely showing contrails that are to the south of London, maybe even over the Channel.
 
Last edited:

cloudspotter

Senior Member.
Goodness.... this is a sign of a very broken society.


Contrails will always be around the capital. Its a “hot city” Do you explain anywhere on the forum or Contrail Science the concept that heat generated from the city will modify the lapse rate towards the unstable.


Also ram rise sat/tat??

Maybe there's just more people around to see them
 

secretschizoid23

New Member
I'll be going to this, I live quite nearby. I've been to several conferences in the past which had people sympathetic to the Chemtrail worldview attending but have never been to one that focuses entirely on the subject. Will be very interesting to see the kind of audience that attends & hear what they have to say. Will take a small camera with full HD vid and my dictaphone with me.
 

HappyMonday

Moderator
I'll be going to this, I live quite nearby. I've been to several conferences in the past which had people sympathetic to the Chemtrail worldview attending but have never been to one that focuses entirely on the subject. Will be very interesting to see the kind of audience that attends & hear what they have to say. Will take a small camera with full HD vid and my dictaphone with me.

Excellent. Just heed Mick's words above. I suspect some of the UK believers I've corresponded with of late may be a tad unpredictable.

Whoever is behind the UK chemtrail project Twitter account seemed nice enough though.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Video from the conference. A presentation that runs through the usual misconceptions and falsehoods.

 

George B

Extinct but not forgotten Staff Member

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
No mockery please. Most, if not all, of the people attending have concerns that seem very valid to them, and they take them very seriously. They are incredibly wrong about the basic science and history of contrails. But poking fun does not help anyone.
 

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
No mockery please. Most, if not all, of the people attending have concerns that seem very valid to them, and they take them very seriously. They are incredibly wrong about the basic science and history of contrails. But poking fun does not help anyone.

From reading many comments over the years, most chemtrail believers get enough fun poked at them from friends and family already.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
From reading many comments over the years, most chemtrail believers get enough fun poked at them from friends and family already.

I imagine some do, so they end up being very isolated - or at least learning never to talk about their beliefs. Then they form groups, either online, or like this conference, and you get group reinforcement.

Anyway, that's all something of another topic. I'm just respectfully asking that if people post here, then they are polite.
 

Spongebob

Active Member
I'll be going to this, I live quite nearby. I've been to several conferences in the past which had people sympathetic to the Chemtrail worldview attending but have never been to one that focuses entirely on the subject. Will be very interesting to see the kind of audience that attends & hear what they have to say. Will take a small camera with full HD vid and my dictaphone with me.

and my dictaphone with me.

Why not use your finger...? :D
 

Spongebob

Active Member
Video from the conference. A presentation that runs through the usual misconceptions and falsehoods.


The lad taking his seat at 7:50 is Ben Emlyn-Jones. A hospital porter/conspiracy theorist who runs this site:

http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/

"Hospital Porters Against the New World Order" - No surprise he was in attendance to soak up more BS.

He subscribes to literally - anything, I`m surprised he was not presenting part of the informative and enlightening lectures...

Google this guy, really...

(he is " Hagbard Celine" on the David Icke fantasy forums)
 

HappyMonday

Moderator
Just watching the first presentation...

"My frustration with not being able to get the answers I want from the subject,"

...is a fairly telling line.
 

David Fraser

Senior Member.
I have been thinking of attending one of these. I have far too much time on my hands and I have been gathering and collating data with relation to water quality, rainwater and air quality. Originally it was for a friend doing a paper on water quality and the effect of volcanic activity in Iceland. I just wonder what the reaction would be if I presented at a get together. If he gets his paper published it would add credence to the fact there seems to be no increase in Al and Ba outside of natural activity, but getting a paper published is a task in itself.
 

David Fraser

Senior Member.
Thanks Jay. I have been ploughing through everything and got there after I posted this. But I missed out a little. I meant to ask what sort of reception would be expected at a "conference" if you question and challenge CT.
 

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
Thanks Jay. I have been ploughing through everything and got there after I posted this. But I missed out a little. I meant to ask what sort of reception would be expected at a "conference" if you question and challenge CT.
Gotta warn you.
Disbelief, antagonism, name-calling, and perhaps violence.

It really depends on what the individual stands to lose. Individually, things might go well face to face. They have all tried to proselytize before and been rebuffed In a group setting, they might stand to lose face among peers and you'd probably get a more negative response. Most of such a group will be hard-core, and a portion will be unreachable. The hard-core don't like debate because they know their weaknesses. Rather than face up to those weaknesses which they should aim to correct, the hard-core will avoid questioning if possible, and be antagonistic if pressed.

You probably should concentrate on the basic key points in a way that encourages them to think beyond what they have been spoon-fed by their leaders. The leaders have avoided anything that could shed doubt on the myth. The rank-and-file probably haven't even put any thought into the contradictions or the irrationality. Realize that few of them have a solid science background or aviation knowedge which is why they got there in the first place. The leadership know this and have avoided any detailed explanations which would require education.


Mick has had the experience, I haven't. Maybe he can explain more.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Thanks Jay. I have been ploughing through everything and got there after I posted this. But I missed out a little. I meant to ask what sort of reception would be expected at a "conference" if you question and challenge CT.

It varies. The "leaders" are generally quite polite. The only time things got heated was when I was (with Steve) talking to a group of 4-5 people. I did a lot of individual talking:

William Thomas - Very nice and reasonable, and seemed to agree with just about everything I said, except he thought his ATC testimony proved everything, but still listened when I explained why I thought it did not. Bemoaned the extreme fringe tone off the conference.

Scott Stevens - Very nice. He showed me loads of photos. It seemed obvious to me he was just cherry picking patterns where there were none, and I tried to explain it to him. It was like talking to a rubber ball. He was a bit nasty about some of the conference attendees.

Michael J. Murphy - Told me he loved me (he does this to all debunkers, part of his philosophy) even though I do what I do. Pretty brief conversation. I tired to engage him in some discussion but he was busy.

Dane Wigington - I first talked to him in the group, things were a little heated (not to the point of fear of violence though), I was trying to explain some of the problems with the soil tests, and I said something like "your tests used EPA6010B, which only tests..." and he angrily cut me off with something like "don't you try to confuse things with your science nonsense". He left and I ended up talking to "Dave"

"Dave" - No sure on the name, a nice guy, he was quite incredulous that I did not believe there was a secret geoengineering project going on, and recommended that I watched WITWATS. We talked for quite a while and I explained what my concerns were.

Clifford Carnicom - I did not talk to, as I did not have the time, I suspect he would just drone on. He's not the type of person to get to the point. Not scary.

"Cement Guy" - gave a long explanation on how chemtrails were invented because the drugs used to be delivered though the tall chimneys of cement factories, and after they got shut down then they had to switch to planes. He seemed a little unhinged, but not violent.

Bruce Douglas - came up and sarcastically shook my hand and thanked me for putting metabunk viruses on his cell phone.

Robert Forgette - Very nice and friendly, he's deep into chemtrails, morgellons, all kinds of things, but said he appreciated my take on things. We hung out for a while.

Anthony J Hilder - He interviewed me, which was basically him doing a slow Gish Gallop, and me explaining things. He's really into it, believing things like dead babies being ground up and added to Pepsi.

John Whyte - the conference organiser, we spoke for a few minutes, he was very nice. I explained my position, and he explained his (everything importnat the MSM tells you is a lie, this is a constructed reality), and we parted on friendly terms.

What I never did was stand up and ask questions in any of the sessions. The audience there was unquestioningly lapping up stuff about alien transcendental vibrations and DNA ascendence, so were not really receptive to science. I did not want to spark anger, as many of the participants genuinely thing that ContrailScience.com is evil, and I am evil, and so they would not be able to get past that. Speaking to people individually was most effective. Just tossing down the gauntlet would have been pointless.

I also eased into conversations where possible. I'd start with something like "I'm a bit skeptical about chemtrails", or just ask them what they thought of the conference. Just start up a conversation.

Having visual aids was useful. Particularly my old cloud books Clouds of the World (1972), and Cloud Studies (1905). You can get people to look at them when you are there in person. I was actually surprised that NOBODY had seen these books before, as I've been using them online for years. That shows that debunking online is generally ignored by the hardcore, but you can get them to look at it in person if you do it politely.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
They will ask why you are doing this, why you care what other people think. Explain why. I do it because I'm interested in the topic, and I think spreading unnecessary fear causes harm, and it's worth trying to stop it.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Steve Funk Does Guy McPherson believe in chemtrails? [No] Contrails and Chemtrails 21
tryblinking Consciousness Beyond Chemtrails Conference Contrails and Chemtrails 41
Danny55 Conciousness Beyond Chemtrails Conference Contrails and Chemtrails 1
Leifer My old videos.... re: chemtrails..... Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 1
Mick West TFTRH #13: Professor David Keith – Geoengineering Research and the Chemtrails Conspiracy Theory Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast 2
Mick West TFTRH #11: Jim Lee – Chemtrails, Geoengineering, Conspiracies, and Semantics Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast 1
Trailblazer Explained: video of concentric circular "chemtrails" (E-3 Sentry AWACS plane, Feb 1 2019) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 3
Ben Geddy Happy to have found this site and Mick thru JRE! Practical Debunking 4
Mick West YouTube adds Encyclopedia Britannica article on Contrails to "Chemtrail" Videos Contrails and Chemtrails 18
FlightMuj Claims of Predictions of Chemtrails in Old Texts Contrails and Chemtrails 3
M Bornong Can Belief in Chemtrails and/or other Conspiracy Theories Lead to Violence? Contrails and Chemtrails 4
skephu Solar geoengineering and the chemtrails conspiracy on social media Contrails and Chemtrails 3
Mick West Chemtrails and the Anti-Vaccine Movement Contrails and Chemtrails 34
MikeG Debunked: Air Force Verifies Chemtrails are Real Contrails and Chemtrails 6
Mick West Banff Chemtrails Billboard Worries David Keith Contrails and Chemtrails 3
Mick West Quantifying Expert Consensus Against Covert Geoengineering / Chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 116
skephu Debunked: Dutch Government Admit Chemtrails Exist Contrails and Chemtrails 7
mrfintoil Debunked: CIA Director admits chemtrails, geoengineering, stratospheric aerosol injection Contrails and Chemtrails 24
C Strange Flickering in Contrail Video Posted in Earlier Thread [Focussing artifacts] Contrails and Chemtrails 7
Trailblazer Russ Tanner accidentally debunks chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 2
Mick West Demythologizing Prince's reference to "Chemtrails" Contrails and Chemtrails 5
ParanoidSkeptic Chemtrails: Experiments on the Public Contrails and Chemtrails 5
MikeC New Zealand Ministry of Environment reply to "chemtrail" query Contrails and Chemtrails 6
F Explained: Video of plane leaving "6 chemtrails, then 2" [Mixed Exhaust and Aerodynamic Contrails] Contrails and Chemtrails 6
Mick West Debunked: Article: "Court Takes Child From Mother After She Mentions Chemtrails At School" Contrails and Chemtrails 92
skephu Chuck Norris on chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 7
Mick West Vice: 'It Was Like a Cult': Leaving the World of Online Conspiracy Theories Escaping The Rabbit Hole 4
skephu Paul Beckwith (climate scientist) on chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 19
JFDee Debunked: Lichens and Moss on Trees Caused by Chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Sausalito Spectral analysis of alleged "chemtrails" Contrails and Chemtrails 1
Jay Reynolds Safya Yassin, Missouri ISIS supporter and chemtrails believer arrested for threats Contrails and Chemtrails 1
Trailblazer Chemtrail response from Swiss Federal Office of the Environment Contrails and Chemtrails 3
MikeG Climate Change War Games Contrails and Chemtrails 0
Mick West Persistent Trails Survey Shows Chemtrail Believers Only Recently Noticed Persistent Trails Contrails and Chemtrails 32
Dan Page idea: a "Debunked" Stamp Practical Debunking 9
Z 3 military helicopters Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 14
Mick West Debunked: AnonSec's NASA Hack, Global Hawk Hijack, Evidence of Chemtrails [Public Domain Data] General Discussion 32
MikeG Giant Snowflakes [Rimed Dendrites] Contrails and Chemtrails 24
Balance Blatant photoshop deceit of BP refueling tank Contrails and Chemtrails 2
Dan Page Claim: Mobile app uses atmospheric data to prove chemtrails vs contrails Contrails and Chemtrails 12
MikeG Futurism and Chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 4
MikeG Accidental Geoengineering Contrails and Chemtrails 7
MikeG Debunked: HAARP Caught in Action Contrails and Chemtrails 28
Ray Von Geezer Ian Simpson / Look-up.org.uk debunks chemtrails & geoengineering Contrails and Chemtrails 13
skephu Parallel lines of clouds (Virginia Beach) Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 3
Ray Von Geezer George Monbiot in the Guardian on "Chemtrails" & Look-up.org.uk Contrails and Chemtrails 26
Dan Page Is Belief in "Chemtrails" Growing? Contrails and Chemtrails 63
P Hi all, I'm new to this forum, so still trying to find my way around. I wanted to comment regarding Contrails and Chemtrails 2
MikeG Common Core and Geoengineering Contrails and Chemtrails 2
Trailblazer Debunked: "Top climate scientist Tim Lenton admits to ongoing geoengineering" Contrails and Chemtrails 23
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top