Radapox
Member
This doorbell camera footage from April 27 was posted by someone in the Netherlands on the "Ufomeldpunt" (original post here: https://www.ufomeldpunt.nl/melding/10770-ufo-met-vreemd-pad-door-de-lucht). From 0:10 onwards you can see what looks like some sort of "spark" flying across the sky:
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQV1xV7PGOw
What do you think of this? My first impression was a digital fake, because to me it looks like someone moving their cursor across the screen, with some kind of "particles" effect added to it. However, the original poster stresses that the footage has not been tampered with, and I see no reason to disbelieve them.
So what else could this be? Fireworks would seem an option (although no sound was heard), but one of the comments suggests it could be an insect flying by, with the "particle" effect being merely a camera artefact. This sounds plausible to me: note how the individual particles in the object's "tail" do not seem to move along with the object itself, but stay in the same location before fading out; this is especially apparent around 0:12-0:14. This could indeed mean the tail is simply an afterimage; perhaps something to do with IR light?
Does similar footage exist which corroborates this explanation? I'm curious to hear your thoughts on this.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQV1xV7PGOw
What do you think of this? My first impression was a digital fake, because to me it looks like someone moving their cursor across the screen, with some kind of "particles" effect added to it. However, the original poster stresses that the footage has not been tampered with, and I see no reason to disbelieve them.
So what else could this be? Fireworks would seem an option (although no sound was heard), but one of the comments suggests it could be an insect flying by, with the "particle" effect being merely a camera artefact. This sounds plausible to me: note how the individual particles in the object's "tail" do not seem to move along with the object itself, but stay in the same location before fading out; this is especially apparent around 0:12-0:14. This could indeed mean the tail is simply an afterimage; perhaps something to do with IR light?
Does similar footage exist which corroborates this explanation? I'm curious to hear your thoughts on this.