I understand you think your "rabbit" analogy is extremely clever, so much so that you repeat it over and over, long after the joke has lost its giggle.
What are you here for? Just to ask questions? Just to point out "anomalies" you see? Why do you keep telling us you don't see damage on the lawn after it's been explained to you numerous times that the plane did not hit the lawn. Why do you keep repeating yourself?
The rabbit analogy is perfect, in this case the rabbit just doesn't fit the hat let alone do we ever see it pulled out, and reassembled like in any other aircraft disaster
Someone simply stating that "the landing gear wasn't down" when no one mentioned landing gear is an entirely disingenuous argument when the question didn't involve landing gear in the first place. I believe I mentioned that the body of a 757 is about 12 feet in diameter and the engines about 7 feet in diameter with a small bit of overlap, call it a 16 maybe 17 foot tall object assuming this variant had the smaller engines on it, thats supposedly disappeared into an area about 14 feet tall, without something dragging on the ground. Just doesn't get it.
So I guess I'm here to figure out why anyone would believe such an entirely implausible magic trick. The likelihood that I'm being lied to, again, by my illustrious leaders is extremely high. Particularly likely when things like random people are seen immediately picking up and carting off the evidence, never to be seen again. except for of course a few, what appear to be carefully staged photos. Or when the security camera evidence is declared a matter of national security, and withheld from public viewing. But my fave is that the hole isn't just a little to small to fit a 757, but wildly so, particularly when there's a discrepancy of at least 4 feet in height just in the fuselage and about 25 feet in height in the craft overall. Angle or no angle that height should fit. Engines fuselage and tail section are all quite substantial and would have most definitely left at least a mark.
Why do I repeat myself, why do you repeat the governments entirely inadequate magic trick ? Why did Mick actually take the time to notice the screen shot that replaced the real view in the elephant gag ? The answer is obvious, inquiring minds want to know.