TWCobra
Senior Member.
Can anyone here explain it to a layman?
Example: MattStopChemtrails. I pick Matt because he is a fellow Australian, deeply committed and apparently there is something very strange in his psychological makeup. Matt is reknown for applying the parameters of the Appleman graph incorrectly, using the sea level temperatures and RH values to "prove" that contrails can never exist in sub-tropical Queeensland where he lives. Apparently there is no air-traffic either where he lives, just north of Brisbane. I have have not shown him the Australian visualization produced by Mick yet, but only because I suspect that his "filtering mechanisms" will simply not allow his brain to process the information.
That aside, his last FB entry is worthy of comment.
Matt considers that his finding of an unclassified research report submitted by a USAF Major attending a staff college as absolute irrefutable proof of widespread ongoing weaponised weather manipulation, that is happening now.
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ada539515
I just need some help in understanding how he gets to this point, after crossing what I consider to be the following, intractable logic gates.
Quotes from the preamble to the report...
1. Operational Defenses through Weather Control in 2030
2. A Research Report Submitted to the Faculty In Partial Fulfillment of the Graduation Requirements
Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama
April 2009
3. Distribution A: approved for Public Release: Distribution Unlimited
4. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified5. Disclaimer The views expressed in this academic research paper are those of the author(s) and do not
reflect the official policy or position of the US government or the Department of Defense. In
accordance with Air Force Instruction 51-303, it is not copyrighted, but is the property of the
United States government.
So how do we get from there to this FB post and the absolute uncritical admiration of his followers?
The post can be found here.
https://www.facebook.com/#!/AustraliansAgainstChemtrails?fref=ts
So I am at a loss. I feel like, that to cope with this mindset, one needs almost to become like them. Frankly that scares me. Does anyone have some professional input as to the pyschological profile we are dealing with here?
Example: MattStopChemtrails. I pick Matt because he is a fellow Australian, deeply committed and apparently there is something very strange in his psychological makeup. Matt is reknown for applying the parameters of the Appleman graph incorrectly, using the sea level temperatures and RH values to "prove" that contrails can never exist in sub-tropical Queeensland where he lives. Apparently there is no air-traffic either where he lives, just north of Brisbane. I have have not shown him the Australian visualization produced by Mick yet, but only because I suspect that his "filtering mechanisms" will simply not allow his brain to process the information.
That aside, his last FB entry is worthy of comment.
Matt considers that his finding of an unclassified research report submitted by a USAF Major attending a staff college as absolute irrefutable proof of widespread ongoing weaponised weather manipulation, that is happening now.
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ada539515
I just need some help in understanding how he gets to this point, after crossing what I consider to be the following, intractable logic gates.
Quotes from the preamble to the report...
1. Operational Defenses through Weather Control in 2030
2. A Research Report Submitted to the Faculty In Partial Fulfillment of the Graduation Requirements
Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama
April 2009
3. Distribution A: approved for Public Release: Distribution Unlimited
4. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified5. Disclaimer The views expressed in this academic research paper are those of the author(s) and do not
reflect the official policy or position of the US government or the Department of Defense. In
accordance with Air Force Instruction 51-303, it is not copyrighted, but is the property of the
United States government.
So how do we get from there to this FB post and the absolute uncritical admiration of his followers?
External Quote:
'Operational Defenses through Weather Control in 2030'
by Michael C. Boger, Major, United States Air Force
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ada539515
AAC exclusive!
...
Wow .. I just can't believe this document I found .. I can't even begin to digest this, and the context this puts everything in ... we were right about everything .. nanotech, artificial clouds, electromagnetic frequencies, the movement of the jetstream, they can do all of it .. and we know that.. but this proves it is all being used together!!
Even better, the key players we believed to be involved are all actually involved. It falls short of naming the chemtrail aerosols, however "smart dust" is mentioned, as is on page 29 a diagram displaying "cloud creation" through cargo planes and drones! They HAVE been spraying NANOTECH which is toxic to all biological systems, among other things!
And under the UN Open Skies Treaty which came into effect in 2002 that the Howard Govt signed, I believe this is how they have been doing it openly without fear of reprisal in Australia and probably the other countries which began to experience daily spraying from this point on, really ramping up by 2006/2007 across our nation.
The paper clearly states that there is a command centre called 'Weather Control' operating under the Combined Air Forces Command (CFACC) of the Department of Defense (DoD).
NOAA, WMA (Weather Mod Assoc), NASA and others are all key players providing modelling etc.! These are the same players who we have been accusing of a massive coverup and brainwashing exercise (see last week's NOAA "fog rings" story; NASA's constant changing of the cloud charts and contrail propaganda thereof).
You can be sure that the CIA is also involved in this - so Evergreen, Raytheon, Omega Air etc. are probably just contractors operating planes through the CFACC for their spray objectives. Many of these may be drone planes.
This outlines the relay model used to choose spray locations, with VERY ADVANCED MODELLING, and one can assume the goal is to eventually phase out of chemtrails (at least for weather control) and replace them with sophisticated weather balloons with self-releasing nanotech for total control of global weather.
These nanoballons would be self-defending and create a field where any target between can be destroyed by heating of the atmosphere or via lasers! It sounds like science fiction, but this all can already be done and this document tells us how far it has come.
What we may be seeing that we consider to be a product of EMF may be experimentation with large ion clouds (aerosol chemclouds - as patented and documented by Bernard Eastlund, the spiritual father of chemtrails, a longtime researcher of Tesla technology for the US military) to impact weather events, and by doing this across as much terrain as possible even in outback Australia they are foolproofing their feedback mechanism as well as delivering weather outcomes for profit.
The nanotech they release could be programmed for a variety of purposes in the future, including mind manipulation and transhumanism, and this may give a valid explanation for Morgellons disease in the population.
So the pilots are most likely Americans who believe they are doing this to protect and advance top secret US interests! By spraying anywhere that signed the Open Skies Treaty at the command of the DoD's CFACC!! This also would explain why the planes are unmarked yet landing at Aussie bases.
There's 60+ references here too which will explain it all in a lot more detail.
Chemtrails and global weather control is very real.
It must be exposed and stopped!
You are not crazy for believing this. This is fact!
Feel vindicated people!!!
The post can be found here.
https://www.facebook.com/#!/AustraliansAgainstChemtrails?fref=ts
So I am at a loss. I feel like, that to cope with this mindset, one needs almost to become like them. Frankly that scares me. Does anyone have some professional input as to the pyschological profile we are dealing with here?
