Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri_vlLaCkNM
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth is a group that promotes the idea that the World Trade Center was destroyed by pre-planted explosives on 9/11 and that the plane impacts and fires were just a cover.
After years of telling people that they should believe them because they are architects and engineers, they have changed tactics. They now promote the idea that it's OBVIOUS that explosives are used, and that anyone can see this. They promoted this idea over the last month with a series of increasingly silly memes.

This prompts a question: if it's so obvious, then what was the point of AE911Truth? What was the point of funding a complicated study of World Trade Center Building Seven for $316,000? What are all those long technical documents on their web site for? Why collect supposed experts if the answer is so obvious?
Of course, the superficial "obviousness" of the collapses looking odd has long been the foundation of 9/11 "Truth". AE911 has simply shed the veneer of science that they couched this in. They never really had a deep understanding of the events of 9/11, they started out thinking it was obvious, and then tried to concoct a series of increasingly bizarre hypotheses to shoehorn in all the things they did not understand. Debris trailing white smoke? Nanothermite rockets! Can't see the top of the building? It has turned to dust!
AE911 has jumped the shark. Their regression to "it's obvious" is a tacit admission that they have no good evidence and that in many, if not all, cases of supposed evidence, they were simply wrong.
References:
https://www.facebook.com/ae911truth. (Archive: https://archive.is/41Tqb)
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth is a group that promotes the idea that the World Trade Center was destroyed by pre-planted explosives on 9/11 and that the plane impacts and fires were just a cover.
After years of telling people that they should believe them because they are architects and engineers, they have changed tactics. They now promote the idea that it's OBVIOUS that explosives are used, and that anyone can see this. They promoted this idea over the last month with a series of increasingly silly memes.
This prompts a question: if it's so obvious, then what was the point of AE911Truth? What was the point of funding a complicated study of World Trade Center Building Seven for $316,000? What are all those long technical documents on their web site for? Why collect supposed experts if the answer is so obvious?
Of course, the superficial "obviousness" of the collapses looking odd has long been the foundation of 9/11 "Truth". AE911 has simply shed the veneer of science that they couched this in. They never really had a deep understanding of the events of 9/11, they started out thinking it was obvious, and then tried to concoct a series of increasingly bizarre hypotheses to shoehorn in all the things they did not understand. Debris trailing white smoke? Nanothermite rockets! Can't see the top of the building? It has turned to dust!
AE911 has jumped the shark. Their regression to "it's obvious" is a tacit admission that they have no good evidence and that in many, if not all, cases of supposed evidence, they were simply wrong.
References:
https://www.facebook.com/ae911truth. (Archive: https://archive.is/41Tqb)
Last edited: