Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OClixCTdDw
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-DadyW-LR4
The above two videos details some issues raised in the thread below (and in prior threads) regarding Professor Hulsey's study.
Draft report and videos at:
http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
http://ine.uaf.edu/media/222439/uaf_wtc7_draft_report_09-03-2019.pdf (mirror)
Hulsey's Presentation on Sept 3 [Slides enlarges. Question Audio Fixed]External Quote:The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building. All input data, results data, and simulations that were used or generated during this study are available at http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAEHhDCTaBw
This thread is to discuss the data within Leroy Husley's final draft report funded by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth "A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7" released September 3, 2019.
This thread should be viewed as an analytical and informational thread, written for outside readers looking for informed analysis. Links and quotes that support your comment, must accompany all observations and objections.
https://www.metabunk.org/metabunks-link-policy.t5158/
This thread will be strictly moderated.
Please focus on the data WITHIN the report only.
This thread should be viewed as an analytical and informational thread, written for outside readers looking for informed analysis. Links and quotes that support your comment, must accompany all observations and objections.
https://www.metabunk.org/metabunks-link-policy.t5158/
This thread will be strictly moderated.
- Off topic observations will be removed.
- Circular arguments will be removed. If you disagree with someone, but have nothing NEW to add to your previous observations, then use the "disagree icon".
- Long winded, gish gallop responses and comments are strongly discouraged and may be deleted.
Please focus on the data WITHIN the report only.
Linking MB's original threads on the topic:
https://www.metabunk.org/ae911-truths-wtc7-evaluation-computer-modelling-project.t5627/
https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-uaf-study-shows-wtc7-could-not-have-collapsed-from-fire.t9056/
Other discussions:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=12807300#post12807300
https://www.metabunk.org/ae911-truths-wtc7-evaluation-computer-modelling-project.t5627/
https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-uaf-study-shows-wtc7-could-not-have-collapsed-from-fire.t9056/
Other discussions:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=12807300#post12807300
Attachments
-
Figure 4.16 Hypothetical Failure of Columns 76 to 81 — UAF WTC 7 Draft Report.mp41 MB · Views: 974
-
Figure 4.20 Hypothetical Simultaneous Failure of All Core Columns — UAF WTC 7 Draft Report.mp41.1 MB · Views: 1,011
-
Figure 4.24a Near-Simultaneous Failure of All Columns Persp. 1 — UAF WTC 7 Draft Report.mp4920 KB · Views: 908
-
Figure 4.24b Near-Simultaneous Failure of All Columns Persp. 2 — UAF WTC 7 Draft Report.mp4927.9 KB · Views: 915
Last edited: