Proof of atmospheric magnification?

Hepper

New Member
Flat-Earthers generally invoke "atmospheric magnification" to explain how the sun maintains its apparent size during the day. Basically, this is the assertion that the atmosphere somehow magnifies distant objects. As supposed proof, some people have offered videos of boats disappearing below the horizon. This video is a good example:

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpAGXpusAiQ


Here's a picture of the large boat at 1:00.

atmospheric magnification.PNG

Notice that the boat is already below the horizon. Assuming a viewer height of 2 metres (=6.5 ft), I'd say that this ship is at least 10km (6.5 miles) away from the observer. 15 minutes later (around 15:00), the boat has almost completely vanished below the horizon.

löl.PNG

If this ship moved at a speed of approx. 36km/h (typical for large container ships, according to this website), it would have travelled about 9km or 5.5 miles during that time. However, the top structures of the ship did not become smaller, even though perspective dictates that objects get increasingly smaller as they move away from the observer. I am fully aware that the apparent size of an object is inversely proportional to its distance to the observer. Still though, it seems counterintuitive that the size of this object remained constant throughout the video. Is atmospheric magnification at work here?
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
Is atmospheric magnification at work here?
And the short answer is no. The atmosphere does not magnify things in the sense of a magnifying glass type thing. However, it CAN stretch (or compress, and distort) them vertically. So if you want to measure angular size, it's always best to use the width.
 

Hepper

New Member
So I made two screenshots (the first at 1:00 and the second around 9:00) and I aligned the top structures of the ship, adding some reference lines to help the viewer visualize the change in size. Between minute 1 and minute 9 in the video, the ship has probably travelled 4, maybe 5 kilometres, so the change in size should be significant.

















As can be seen, the structures are stretched out in the second screenshot, due to distortion. However, the width apparently decreased quite a bit. So Mick West's statement seems to be correct.
 

Loki Thorson

New Member
If the atmosphere magnifies the sun (notice how it stays almost pixel perfect from any point in the world, at any point of its transit, simultaneously - I would expect some variation).

Then this should do it for any object - aircraft, gliders, hot air balloons etc etc.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Why Michio Kaku is wrong about the UFO Burden of Proof & Navy Videos UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 32
M Do Ibiza and Mallorca prove a Flat Earth? [No, they demonstrate the curve of the globe] Flat Earth 24
ManFrito Red Dragon, Cassini Picture Being Used As Nibiru Proof Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 11
Jared Some proof The Moon is not it's Own Light Source Flat Earth 2
Rory Debunked: Eric Dubay "Flat Earth Proof" #13 Flat Earth 23
Mike Fl Can someone debunk this? Sandy Hook Shooting 100% Fraud Proof in 2 mins. - Photo Time Analysis Sandy Hook 21
M Debunk: The horizon never falling as proof of flat Earth theory Flat Earth 29
Tobes Debunked: James Fetzer claims Shannon Hick's photo is "smoking gun" proof of a drill Sandy Hook 24
Mick West Debunked: Proof that MH-17 is MH-370? [MH-17 actually did have a covered window] Flight MH17 11
Mick West Debunked: Irrefutable proof we are all being sprayed with poison [Lead in Avgas] Contrails and Chemtrails 13
J Debunked: Full proof sandy hook was closed 5 yrs ago Sandy Hook 25
Jay Reynolds Debunked: KC-10 Video with Aerodynamic Contrails and Flap Track Fairings as Proof of "Spraying" West/Wigington Geoengineering Debate 49
jvnk08 "More proof" video - guy dumping powder from bag Boston Marathon Bombings 5
Mick West Tip: Ask for Evidence, Don't Ask for Proof Practical Debunking 0
SeriouslyDebatable Did FBI Director Robert Mueller Really Say There Was No Legal Proof of hijackers ID? 9/11 18
PCWilliams Burden of Proof General Discussion 46
George B Proof that Robot cats exist. . . . Conspiracy Theories 9
U INDENIABLE PROOF chemtrails is real Contrails and Chemtrails 66
Pogopoint99 Ice Storm Geoengineered – Here is Your Proof! Contrails and Chemtrails 12
MikeC Skywatch's "proof positive" Contrails and Chemtrails 5
H Illusions of Curvature - RC Boat Hidden on Small Pond Flat Earth 10
Stefan Leahu How atmospheric tunelling and refraction really look like in real life. Flat Earth 0
Everett Anderson Standard Atmospheric Refraction: Empirical Evidence and Derivation Flat Earth 18
jeranism Explained: Observations of Canigou, Curvature of the Earth & Atmospheric Refraction Flat Earth 158
M Bornong 120° Parhelia Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 4
Mick West Simulating Atmospheric Refraction Tools for Investigating and Debunking 70
Sandor Szekely Atmospheric sunlight refraction arguments on the Eratosthenes triangulation method Flat Earth 37
Dan Page Claim: Mobile app uses atmospheric data to prove chemtrails vs contrails Contrails and Chemtrails 12
keefe ARM Climate Research Facility Contrails and Chemtrails 17
David Ridlen Earth curvature refraction experiments - debunking flat/concave Earth Flat Earth 344
GregMc Children present atmospheric....lies Contrails and Chemtrails 29
George B How could you prove Intentional Covert Atmospheric Aerosol Injection Program exists Contrails and Chemtrails 176
George B If I designed an Intentional Covert Atmospheric Aerosol Injection Program Contrails and Chemtrails 430
firepilot Atmospheric Optics.com Contrails and Chemtrails 1
Related Articles


































Related Articles

Top