Professional witnesses disagree with NIST's assessment of conditions, (upon which they based their findings).
How can there be such massive disparity between experienced people in situ and subsequent hypothesis of why the tower collapsed?
NIST's assessment of the temperatures in the Tower, (500 to 600 degrees C) just prior to collapse cannot be accurate as it would be impossible for Ladder 15 to be where they said they were.
http://www.wireonfire.com/donpaul/wit/23TranscriptFDNYfirefightertheSouthTower.pdf
http://www.nyfd.com/radio.html
How are these discrepancies reconciled?
How can there be such massive disparity between experienced people in situ and subsequent hypothesis of why the tower collapsed?
NIST's assessment of the temperatures in the Tower, (500 to 600 degrees C) just prior to collapse cannot be accurate as it would be impossible for Ladder 15 to be where they said they were.
http://www.wireonfire.com/donpaul/wit/23TranscriptFDNYfirefightertheSouthTower.pdf
Last edited: