Post 9/11 Government Contractors ' War on Terror' Authorized Testing on U.S. Persons


New Member
In July 2010 The Washington Post released an indepth article entitled 'A Top Secret American - July 2010', detailing the top 3100 government contractors now developing war technology, human intelligence, satellite weapons (direct energy, high frequency weapons, electromagnetic pulse weapons, through-the-wall technologies, and more). A follow up article detailed the use of Homeland Security Fusion centers who admitted that they were monitoring, or had under suvelliance millions of innocent civilians who have never committed any crimes (in their own words).

What most Americans were not aware of is that our own Senate and House 'secret' Committees have been authorizing the testing and evaluation of these war weapons and technologies on U.S. Person; civilians and military personnal; also written in DOD Directive (not law) 5240.1-R as 'unwitting' (unknowledgeable) U.S. persons, or those targeted (by Fusion centers, CERTs, Citizens Corps, neighborhood watch groups, military or private companies 'if your DNA' is required). This directive goes even further to state that testing could be conducted if the U.S. person or targets grants consent or if their lack of consent is overwritten by This testing also applies to the spraying of those on-going chemical trails across our skies that has created an ill-effect to our weather, our fields, our waters, birds and the fish we eat; and that goes without stating our health as these chemicals fall to the earth as our children play. With ongoing concerns cities and states are expressing concerns about the visible damages that these chemical trails are causing.

In addition to this concern, many have also expressed concern for the recently approved additional 30,000 Drones to be developed, tested and evaluated as kill machines in our U.S. skies at the cost of 65 Billion to U.S. citizens. Keeping in mind that approximately 300 liscenses were already issued to private companies and the military to test and fly the current Drones across the U.S. skies. This is about money, greed and nothing else.

When you consider that every citizen of these United States is at risk of harm due to the required testing and required targeted hits per certification and recertification of each Drone (FOIA Request by the ACLU on Predator Drones).

DOD Directive Procedure 13:

Procedure 13 - Experimentation on Human Subjects for Intelligence Purposes
This procedure applies to experimentation on human subjects if such experimentation is conducted by or on behalf of a DoD intelligence component. This procedure does not apply to experimentation on animal subjects.
1. Experimentation in this context means any research or testing activity involving human subjects that may expose such subjects to the possibility of permanent or temporary injury (including physical or psychological damage and damage to the reputation of such persons) beyond the risks of injury to which such subjects are ordinarily exposed in their daily lives. REALLY?
2. Experimentation is conducted on behalf of a DoD intelligence component if it is conducted under contract to that component or to another DoD component for the benefit of the intelligence component or at the request of such a component regardless of the existence of a contractual relationship. So no contract is required….just test on humans if you chose.
3. Human subjects in this context includes any person whether or not such person is a United States person…..

After reviewing these documents, please consider sending a message to our Senate and House of Representatives to stop the non-consensual testing of war weapons on civilians and military personnel at petition:

Mick West

Staff member
Testing on humans require informed consent. Any testing done, INCLUDING DOD TESTING, without informed consent, is illegal.


New Member
Most citizens are not aware of DOD Directive 5240.1-R that authorizes the DOD/DOJ, government contractors and private companies to test war weapons on 'unwitting' U.S. persons. I have a letter linked form former Army Intelligence Offier Julianne McKinney to former President Clinton linked to the petition.

And here is another directive....BILLIONS of 'unwitting' U.S. citizens are being tested on 24/7, if not chemicals via chemical trails, then testing by satellites war weapons and technologies:
PUBLIC LAW 95-79 [P.L. 95-79] TITLE 50, CHAPTER 32, SECTION 1520 “CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM” “The use of human subjects will be allowed for the testing of chemical and biological agents by the U.S. Department of Defense, accounting to Congressional committees with respect to the experiments and studies. The Secretary of Defense [may] conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological [warfare] agents on civilian populations [within the United States].” SOURCE – Public Law 95-79, Title VIII, Sec. 808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 91, page 334, you will find Public Law 95-79. Public Law 97-375, title II, Sec. 203(a)(1), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1882. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 96, page 1882, you will find Public Law 97-375.

AND YES IT IS ILLEGAL, but BILLIONS of citizens are not aware of such directives (not laws) and are considered ‘unwitting’ subjects; once ill they seek medical treatment, or die from unexplained heart attacks or anuresums, or our children experiencing lung deases.

No one, reads Senate budgets to locate authorized testing locations and by which private companies, military branches or government contractors. We have for decades trusted our leaders in the Senate (Congress) and these have been their actions for decades; and without justificaiton, especially since we are not at war and testing on humans without consent in illegal. It should be considered a war crime.

Mick West

Staff member
That directive also requires informed consent.


-CITE- 50 USC Sec. 1520a 01/03/2012 (112-90)-EXPCITE- TITLE 50 - WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE CHAPTER 32 - CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM-HEAD- Sec. 1520a. Restrictions on use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents-STATUTE-

(a) Prohibited activities
The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract) - (1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or (2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.

(b) Exceptions
Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes: (1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity. (2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents. (3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.

(c) Informed consent required
The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) of this section only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.[/ex]

What is wrong with experiments with informed consent?
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mauro Can anyone explain me how to link a specific post? Site Feedback & News 7
P Problems with first post not meeting posting guidelines Site Feedback & News 7
Oystein Report: "23 die in Norway after receiving Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine" (NY Post) Coronavirus COVID-19 9
Mendel Post Election Social Media Crackdowns Election 2020 19
JFDee Washington Post: Former QAnon believer's tale Escaping The Rabbit Hole 2
Royce Malphrus What is this? [unidentified object in photo from vehicle: lamp post] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 19
Mick West 4Chan's QAnon's +++ vs. Trump's. Post timestamps Conspiracy Theories 7
Mick West Debunked: Dylann Storm Roof Huffington Post Timestamp before the shooting Conspiracy Theories 33
Mick West Debunked: Obama Geoengineering April Fools Joke on Huffington Post Contrails and Chemtrails 2
Mick West Deleted Post Placeholders Site Feedback & News 1
Mick West How to Tag someone in a post to let them know they were mentioned How To 3
Mick West How to upload and attach an image or file to a post How To 3
Cairenn Washington Post Blog on weather conspiracies Contrails and Chemtrails 11
Mick West How to Post an Image on Metabunk How To 5
Mick West Double Post Prevention Site Feedback & News 1
Mick West Welcome Thread - New Members Post Here General Discussion 2393
Marc Powell As early as 1913, Woodrow Wilson warned of the shadow government that was behind the 9/11 tragedy 9/11 50
Marc Powell Debunked: Government officials revealed having foreknowledge of Building 7’s collapse 9/11 58
Mick West TFTRH #23: Ian/TheoryQED: UFOs, Government Cover-ups, and Alien Visitors. Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast 32
Mick West Debunked: "There Exists a Shadowy Government" — Daniel Inouye Quotes Debunked 0
MikeG Claim: DC officials are "flocking" to "Doomsday Camps" Conspiracy Theories 4
Marin B Garrett Graff : "Bungling" is a more likely explanation for government conspiracy theories Conspiracy Theories 7
skephu Debunked: Dutch Government Admit Chemtrails Exist Contrails and Chemtrails 7
MikeC New Zealand Ministry of Environment reply to "chemtrail" query Contrails and Chemtrails 6
qed ZA Government accuses US of plotting regime change in ZA General Discussion 15
Trailblazer Chemtrail response from Swiss Federal Office of the Environment Contrails and Chemtrails 3
Jay Reynolds Government of Cyprus said to find no evidence of spraying Contrails and Chemtrails 1
MikeG Debunked: Government to Nationalize Food Supply Conspiracy Theories 0
CeruleanBlu Project scientist Eric Korpela talks about SETI, aliens, and government conspiracies. UFOs and Aliens 0
Bruce Lansberg Dutch Government discloses 245 official documents Flight MH17 0
E** Claim: Forbes article proves Obama/government caught telling media to coverup ebola Conspiracy Theories 2
David Alex Jones Video: Government Weather Manipulation Exposed Conspiracy Theories 129
Mathias Olsen Partially Debunked: List of Monsanto Employees in Government Conspiracy Theories 30
Willie Ansel Adams: "It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government..." Quotes Debunked 11
Critical Thinker Debunked: "Government Labels those who Grow Their Own Food ‘Extremists’" Conspiracy Theories 12
Mick West Debunked: Government Stockpiling Unusual Amounts of Ammo [by Tom Coburn's GAO Report] Conspiracy Theories 63
Cairenn Debunked: Government Buying Iodine in Response to Fukushima Fallout. Conspiracy Theories 31
Mick West Debunked: Debunkers Trust the Government and Think Everything is Fine Practical Debunking 89
BlueCollarCritic Debunked Conspiracies Update - The Government Is Not Confiscating Guns General Discussion 18
AluminumTheory Debunked: Infowars Study: Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile General Discussion 25
Rroval Video: US Government Admits UFOs in Press Conference | Disclosure UFOs and Aliens 3
Cairenn Debunked: Government buys 30,000 guillotines Conspiracy Theories 20
BlueCollarCritic Government Is Spying on Your Cell Phone Calls Conspiracy Theories 152
Jimbo 2 Living ETs Working With US Government Conspiracy Theories 11
Miss VocalCord Dutch Government answers chemtrail questions Contrails and Chemtrails 4
Soulfly DOJ investigation of the AP debunk the government controlling the media? General Discussion 0
BenC Debunked: UK Government admits Chemtrails (Legislation HC221) Contrails and Chemtrails 37
Mick West Debunked: ‘White Guilt’ Bracelets - Government wants you to wear them? Conspiracy Theories 223
HappyMonday Ex Government Employee talks about Chemtrails Contrails and Chemtrails 5
Spongebob Has this Government paper been debunked yet? Contrails and Chemtrails 7
Related Articles

Related Articles