NASA National and Interdepartmental Program for Weather Modification 1966


Closed Account
The document is real enough, and there is a similar 1965 report available (warning - 9.3mb pdf download) - both of these also include "climate modification".

Both of them advocate investigating techniques for weather and climate modification, and there is little doubt that there was some research into climate modification - for example the hurricane seeding experiments that went on until the early 1970's.

But most of their emphasis is on research into weather dynamics to enable better forecasting.

The terms of reference of the report are on page 85 of it, Appendix 4.

They boil down to 3 main concerns: modification/dispersal of fog and percipitation for rocket launches, what equipment and techniques should be used (eg computers & mobile facilities are specifically given), and who is going to pay for it all.

Not sure what needs debunking - unless someone says "these are proof of chemtrails" - in which case the usual caveats apply - they show no connection at all.

As for "proof" of weather modification - well they are what they are - early papers on the topic, and not "proof" of anything much being done at all as far as I can see.

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
I think the original poster needs to define debunk. There could be something in it which could be debunked, considering it was published a long time ago and knowledge of weather might have increased yielding insights not know back then.

Mainly though, what needs to be explained by the poster would be what he finds significant about it.

This is similar to the lab tests put out by the Mt. Shasta bunch. They are legitimate lab tests, but the quality control, sampling methodology, chain of custody, and mainly the analysis and correlation of the lab results and ensuing claims by that group are the debunked parts. Exhaustively debunked, in fact.

So, Ninjaa, what do you think is the significance of the document?
Last edited by a moderator:


New Member
This document was with the USAF manual (with the "chemtrails" cover) as a proof that chemtrails exist from 1990. I was just looking if there was any discussion about this document too.

I know that there isnt something special on this document although words like NASA, WEATHER, MODIFICATION etc. is enough , for them, to be a proof that the document talks about chemtrails :p

I ask them what special with this but the didnt answer me...


Active Member
This document was with the USAF manual (with the "chemtrails" cover) as a proof that chemtrails exist from 1990..

Now im pretty sure you are talking about the "inside joke" cover of the chemistry handbook book? in that case we may have something to debunk as i doubt this was in it, however i have not recently gone thru that PDF. I am not sure what 'chemtrails' book you are talking about as its too vague an item taken out of context to be sure what you are talking about. i cant view your pdf on tis ubuntu machine either(it makes the viewer crash).

any of you more familiar with the source he is talking about? i dont remember it from the handbook thread.

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
This document was with the USAF manual (with the "chemtrails" cover) as a proof that chemtrails exist from 1990..
probably speaking about how Harold Saive gave the weather mod 1966 document equal billing with the USAF basic chemistry lab manual.
They do that sort of thing, piggybacking one thing onto another in a sort of Gish Gallop attempt to carry weaker items along.


Active Member
Yea thats what i figured and was trying to get at. I would REALLY hate to have to try and explain the chemistry handbook think again. its just so simple its hard to get across.... it comes down, 100%, to cognitive bias...

As this is not basic chemistry, which would be found in a young cadet's handbook, and that is the only place the word 'chemtrail' shows up outside of the conspiracy, i can only assume we have arrived at a point to debunk. as these are clearly not the same documents i can only assume their being proved together as a sort of bastardized strawman?
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
jarlrmai NASA Administrator Bill Nelson's views on UFOs, UAPs, and Alien Life UFOs and Aliens 34
M Debunked: Atmospheric pressure on Mars is 9 PSI, not 0.09 PSI as claimed by NASA Science and Pseudoscience 76
P Claim: NASA tried to stop Spielberg's 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' Quotes Debunked 21
P Claim: NASA cuts ISS livestream after "Millennium Falcon UFO" enters the frame UFOs and Aliens 16
V NASA Stargazer 1962 project Flat Earth 8
derrick06 Clarifying: Indian Schoolgirls discover Asteroid General Discussion 0
Patrick Gonzalez Need help explaining: NASA images of Earth from 2017 eclipse show different shadow sizes Flat Earth 3
L Claim: NASA is doctoring an image [Scanner Dirt] UFOs and Aliens 7
A Debunked: NASA tampered with the original television audio of the Apollo 11 moon landing Conspiracy Theories 1
Priyadi Eclipses and the Saros Cycle Flat Earth 3
chrono117 How to Debunk Flat Earth Without Relying on NASA or Photos Flat Earth 42
Rory Claim: Nasa' in Hebrew means "to deceive" Flat Earth 11
FlightMuj Explained: NASA documents stating a flat Earth??? Linear Aircraft Models Flat Earth 7
deirdre NASA fakes Michael Collins' spacewalk photo (artistic representation of event) Science and Pseudoscience 23
nickrulercreator [Debunked] Apollo 14 Flag Waving Before Ascent? Science and Pseudoscience 21
P Bizarre alien ship spotted by ISS! Or, you know, maybe not UFOs and Aliens 3
Rory Black square around Earth proves NASA fake footage Flat Earth 3
Leifer "solar sun simulator", 1960's patent Flat Earth 4
Rroval "NASA Confesses to Dosing Americans with Air-borne Lithium & Other Chemicals" Contrails and Chemtrails 1
P Debunked: NASA Nukes Alien Moonbase UFOs and Aliens 15
ki_cz NASA using green screen to fake ISS experiment footage Science and Pseudoscience 14
Santa'sSickRibs Debunked: Apollo 10 "Space Music" UFOs and Aliens 16
Mick West Debunked: AnonSec's NASA Hack, Global Hawk Hijack, Evidence of Chemtrails [Public Domain Data] General Discussion 32
Pete Tar Debunked: Most recent NASA study shows ice growth in Antartica Science and Pseudoscience 15
Josh Heuer Debunked: UFO in NASA live feed [The Moon] UFOs and Aliens 14
Mick West NASA Worldview, New Interface Contrails and Chemtrails 15
Mick West NASA Orion Mission Contrail Shadow Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 14
Graham2001 'NASA worker' claims to have seen humans walking on Mars in 1979 UFOs and Aliens 7
Graham2001 Aulis article uses NASA documents to cast doubt on the reality of Apollo Conspiracy Theories 26
Trailblazer Misrepresented: Stanford, NASA say perpetual sky-haze slows wind, cuts rainfall Contrails and Chemtrails 5
J Debunked: Blurred NASA image on Mars [Stitched in part of the Rover] UFOs and Aliens 13
sgirl New NASA pic of what looks like old ruins on Mars UFOs and Aliens 22
Mick West Debunked: Nasa: Strange Markings Across The Globe 'Might Have Been Made By Aliens' UFOs and Aliens 26
W Debunk NASA is proposing spraying stratospheric aerosols. Contrails and Chemtrails 9
Balance NASA photo captures strange bright light seemingly coming out of Mars General Discussion 39
Mick West Debunked: Giant Bird In Flight On Mars Caught In NASA Billion Pixel View UFOs and Aliens 31
Leifer Debunked: NASA cloud chart is faked Contrails and Chemtrails 31
Hama Neggs NASA on artificial cloud proliferation Contrails and Chemtrails 0
Critical Thinker NASA: 'This September, Ask a NASA Climate Scientist' Contrails and Chemtrails 0
MikeC Debunked: NASA Scientist Admitting 'Chemtrails' for decades (actually Sounding Rockets) Contrails and Chemtrails 17
Chuck Debunked: NASA War Document Exposed (The Future is Now) Conspiracy Theories 290
Kevin45345 Climate change deniers: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere General Discussion 2
JRBids Nasa the future of war Conspiracy Theories 4
U Debunked: Moon Landing and NASA Photo - non parallel shadows Conspiracy Theories 13
George B Explained: Square in a NASA photo? [Centaur Landing Reference Grid] General Discussion 7
Rocky Upcoming UFO report will be 'difficult to explain,' former national intelligence official says UFOs and Aliens 6
M Cigar shaped UFO over Angels Landing, Utah [Probably Starlink] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 7
Inti Deployment of National Guard during The Capitol Riot Election 2020 43
Mick West Is this Twitter Bot trying to affect the national zeitgeist, or just spam? General Discussion 39
MikeG Project Dragnet Conspiracy Theories 2
Related Articles

Related Articles