MUFON video

What do I think? I think it's an "event" reported in 1975, filmed in low resolution, and mostly known by a verbal description. In other words, it's pretty much in the "LIZ", the low information zone, and it seems highly unlikely that we would be able to learn any more about it half a century later. I think it's a waste of time.
 
Okay, thanks for your feedback, all.
you need to type some identifying text in the title or in the OP so people can google search this thread...other this thread is worthless to anyone.
Also provide a screenshot so images searches will also lead people to your thread.

you can still type identifying text now, and it might come up with google searches.

add" you als need t add a timestamp always in text (not just embedded) so if i watch it and want to rewind, i know where to rewind to.
 
you need to type some identifying text in the title or in the OP so people can google search this thread...other this thread is worthless to anyone.
Also provide a screenshot so images searches will also lead people to your thread.

you can still type identifying text now, and it might come up with google searches.

add" you als need t add a timestamp always in text (not just embedded) so if i watch it and want to rewind, i know where to rewind to.
Thanks. Got that from the mod, too! I don't post videos often.
 
Thanks. Got that from the mod, too!
Article:
Bill Herman is my favorite abduction case.


this guy was abducted? i realize it has nothing to do with your pictures but not really sure how long you expected me to watch. are all those clips in first minute the same ufo from same locations? < just a rhetorical question, you obviously dont want anyone researching it as you didnt give any info.
 
Article:
Bill Herman is my favorite abduction case.


this guy was abducted? i realize it has nothing to do with your pictures but not really sure how long you expected me to watch. are all those clips in first minute the same ufo from same locations? < just a rhetorical question, you obviously dont want anyone researching it as you didnt give any info.
Why are you assuming I wanted to defend said video? Sounds paranoid. I only wanted opinions on the first clip, not rest of video. Best to not be so negative if you want to attract "True Believers" to the site, rather work hard to show "mutual respect, honesty, openness, and patience".
Even so, ya'll are useful, and I support the work you do.
 
Last edited:
Why are you assuming I wanted to defend said video?
i dont know what i wrote that makes you assume that i assumed you were defending the video.

my beef is that you didnt type " who, what, where, when".. so we had to do a bunch of unnecessary work to help you i.d the object.

and that you still havent added the necessary info to the OP or anothr post so people can find this thread through "searches"...despite the mods telling you too.

I only wanted opinions on the first clip
it's not the first clip. it starts at 13 mins in. it looks like the 9th clip.

Best to not be so negative if you want to attract "True Believers" to the site
that's fair. it is true i dont want to attract people who post like you did 4 years after joining, because it annoys me. You're not a new member and ive interacted with you, so i know that you know how to provide necessary information into a discussion.

why are you being so snippy about it?

Date:
Location:
How many witnesses:
Links or transcripts to witness descriptions:

you know the drill.
 
you obviously dont want anyone researching it as you didnt give any info.

@Todd Feinman is it this bit? yea i can see that, so my apologies. since the object looked like the screengrab below ie. a fly on a window, and since i know you, i did not think you were defending this particular "ufo". i thought you wanted us to help you search for old articles that offered explanation or something.

1743988537289.png
 
Thanks, yes that is the bit. And thank you for the fly suggestion too. Appreciate it.
I understand why you have the posting rules you do on this forum. I sometimes wonder if it would be useful for you to have a non-public portion of the forum where you consider cases and come to conclusions, and a public-facing portion of the forum with less formal posting rules where you might attract more people to post. Might be more of a problem and an end in itself, however. Just a thought. Perhaps you have that already, don't know.
 
Last edited:
And thank you for the fly suggestion too.
well im confused about what ufo we are analyzing exactly. the next? bit that says "april 14" is something zipping off too..but i didnt want to watch the whole video so im not sure if the two or three "zip offs" are supposed to be the same object the same day, or completely unrelated ufos on different days and locations.


the guy said "three different viewfinders". so im confused. they show us 3 things my fly, then a sky on a computer, then a peach/pink film ...so thats 3. but then some guy gets interviewed but his photo isn't any of those 3.
 
and a public-facing portion of the forum with less formal posting rules where you might attract more people to post.
based on what we have been seeing the last few years... certainly not just you!!... we already have that. :)

but it would be kinda silly to hide the conclusion threads in a non public forum!
 
Back
Top