One thing I found interesting was the claim Kristen Meghan made, something alone the lines of getting an M-16 pointed at your head and thrown to the ground if you were caught with a camera anywhere near the flight line. That seems a bit over the top to me, unless things have dramatically changed since I retired from the Air Force in 2007.
When I was on active duty, all it took was a trip to the public affairs office to get a letter permitting photography in the aircraft operations areas. You were briefed on what areas of the particular type of aircraft you intended to photograph were off limits to photography. Then you had to notify the security police that you'd be out there photographing and during what times of the day. You were required to keep that letter from public affairs on you in case security forces wanted to see it. Sometimes the security patrol would watch you as you took your pictures to ensure you adhered to the "off limits" areas, but as long as you did things the right way, they never bothered you. At least that's the way things were at the bases I was stationed at.
If you did not have a badge permitting you access to the aircraft operations area, you needed an escort. Nothing too crazy, pretty simple actually, and I was able to do this around B-1B bombers, F-16 fighters, and F-117 stealth aircraft - types of aircraft whose technologies, at the time, were more advanced and security sensitive than what they have stationed at Tinker AFB.
Now, with that said, camera or not, if you encroached upon the flight line area without an access badge or appropriate escort, you WOULD end up on the ground with an M-16 pointed at you, just as she stated.
Her statement just seemed a little too dramatic to me, considering the Air Force has public affairs personnel on the flight lines of bases all the time taking photographs:
http://www.af.mil/photos/mediagallery.asp?galleryID=2