# How to use the refraction approximation in the metabunk curve calculator

#### Antithesis

##### New Member
Mick's refraction simulator is well-suited for examining shots of distant objects made possible by temperature inversion. However it is a complex visual tool, and usually I just want the "Refracted Hidden" number from the curve calculator. This requires estimating the temperature gradient, but I haven't yet seen a discussion on how to do this.

During a common case of temperature inversion, warm air over cool water, the temperature gradient can vary greatly near the water, yet the refraction model reduces it to a single number. Could the model even produce a reasonable result in this situation?

I've been obtaining decent answers from the curve calculator using the following estimate:

(temperature gradient) = ((air temperature) - (water temperature)) / (visible height of target)​

I will provide the rationale later, but for now let's test it out.

## Blackpool to Snaefell, Isle of Man

A shot from a previous thread with increased contrast:

65 miles away; viewer height of about 6 inches. Profile taken from the one Mick posted:

In the shot, a sliver of the connecting valley is visible on the right, corresponding to about 75 pixels from the top in the profile. The profile is 248 pixels high and Snaefell is 2034ft, so we see about (75/248)*2034 ≈ 615ft of the mountain.

26.5C = 79.7F. The temperature gradient is (79.7 - 61)/615 ≈ 0.03040650406.

1329.04 + 615 = 1944.04; actual 2034.

## Liverpool to Snaefell, Isle of Man

Picture from a relatively recent video:

84 miles away; viewer height of 218ft. Profile again:

I don't quite see the valley on the right of Snaefell this time. I estimate the horizon to be about 55 pixels down in the profile, which translates to (55/248)*2034 ≈ 451 feet of the mountain showing.

Unfortunately there is no time stamp apart from the upload date, 29 August 2019. Liverpool had a warm spell the previous week.

Let's say the temperature was 20C = 68F when the video was made. Sea temperature:

The temperature gradient is (68-61.9)/451 = 0.01352549889.

1643.3 + 451 = 2094.3; actual 2034.

## Fort Niagara, NY to Toronto

Picture from a previously discussed video:

30.86 miles away; viewer height of 37ft. Note the date of 18 Feb 2017. Mick created a profile overlay in a previous thread:

The CN Tower is 1815ft. Measuring the slanted distances, I estimate 381 pixels out of 441 pixels are above the horizon, so about (381/441)*1815 ≈ 1600 feet of the tower is visible.

At 1:07 in the video, the long shadows coming from the west indicate late afternoon, about 55F:

Water temperature:

Temperature gradient is (55 - 34.5)/1600 = 0.0128125.

198.27 + 1600 = 1798.27; actual 1815.

## Rationale

Viewer is on the left; target is on the right. Assume warm air and cool water.

Although the temperature gradient is constant in the refraction model, in reality the gradient is much higher near the water. However if we are only concerned with the highest point on the target then it's not so bad to spread the gradient evenly from the horizon to the top of the target, like spreading a lump of butter over bread.

Why use the visible height of the target instead of its actual height? Since the most significant refraction takes place near the horizon, we want the model to capture that aspect. Consider a very tall target that is barely peeking above the horizon. Close to the horizon the refraction is greater, but this will not be reflected in the model if we spread the gradient across the actual height of the target, resulting in a small gradient.

In this method for estimating temperature gradients, shorter targets are naturally assigned higher gradients. This comports with shorter targets being stretched in comparison to their taller counterparts, as shown the shot of Toronto.

Last edited:

Replies
135
Views
21K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
32
Views
15K
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Selenelion Eclipses Flat Earth 3
Flat Earth and Refraction with Oil Platforms Hillhouse and Habitat Flat Earth 5
Illusions of Curvature - RC Boat Hidden on Small Pond Flat Earth 10
A question about refraction Flat Earth 5
Does google earth pro simulate refraction [No] Flat Earth 7
Shockwave Shadow and Refraction Spikes Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 16
How atmospheric tunelling and refraction really look like in real life. Flat Earth 0
Refraction Variations Over Water to Bell Island Flat Earth 27
Explained: 17.61 Mile Mirror Flash Supposedly Proves Flat Earth [Refraction] Flat Earth 5
Improving the Laser Dot Rendering in The Refraction Simulator Tools for Investigating and Debunking 8
Demonstrating How Refraction Helps You See Over The Horizon Flat Earth 32
Observations of Brighton from Worthing Pier Flat Earth 135
Debunked: Isle of Man from Blackpool at water level proves flat earth [refraction] Flat Earth 19
Observations of Mallorca Island and the Earth's Curvature Flat Earth 28
Curvature and Refraction in Surveying and Leveling Through History. Old Books, etc. Flat Earth 14
Standard Atmospheric Refraction: Empirical Evidence and Derivation Flat Earth 18
Explained: Observations of Canigou, Curvature of the Earth & Atmospheric Refraction Flat Earth 158
Simulating Atmospheric Refraction Tools for Investigating and Debunking 73
Video of New Orleans Superdome Illustrating Curvature and Refraction Flat Earth 5
Atmospheric sunlight refraction arguments on the Eratosthenes triangulation method Flat Earth 37
A Coronal Iridescent Contrail Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 1
Earth curvature refraction experiments - debunking flat/concave Earth Flat Earth 344
Interesting Refraction/Diffraction phenomenon [Subhorizon halos: Sub-sun, Sub-sundog] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 12
Advanced Knowledge Management Systems for Metabunk? Site Feedback & News 33
How to Delete Your Account and Data on Metabunk How To 0
Metabunk 2.0 Site Feedback & News 34
Tales From the Rabbit Hole - A Mick West / Metabunk Podcast Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast 20
I'm displaying ads for ETRH on Metabunk Site Feedback & News 8
Need Debunking (Claim): Metabunk Curve Calculator Does Not Calculate for Angular Size Flat Earth 13
Metabunk Flat Earth Route Simulator Tools for Investigating and Debunking 17
Presenting the good stuff in Metabunk and Contrail Science in a different way? Practical Debunking 6
Metabunk linked from Cracked.com article on "Truthers" Sandy Hook 2
Metabunk is Five Years Old Site Feedback & News 15
Monetizing Metabunk? Site Feedback & News 22
The Linode/Metabunk Power Outage Site Feedback & News 5
How to search for an image on Metabunk (and other websites) How To 9
Metabunk is Four Years Old Site Feedback & News 16
Metabunk is my new rabbit hole Escaping The Rabbit Hole 12
Metabunk is Three Years Old Site Feedback & News 6
Has Trolling Increased, here on Metabunk? Site Feedback & News 11
The members of Metabunk are a "Disinformation Group" General Discussion 18
How to Post an Image on Metabunk How To 5
About Metabunk Site Feedback & News 0
Metabunk facebook page Site Feedback & News 6
Do you want to be a moderator on Metabunk? Site Feedback & News 26
List of 9/11 threads on Metabunk General Discussion 0
Metabunk is now on ForumRunner for iPhone, iPad and Android Site Feedback & News 0
Is Metabunk slow for you Site Feedback & News 8
Contrail Science and Metabunk on the Critical Wit Podcast General Discussion 0
Related Articles