How to use the refraction approximation in the metabunk curve calculator


New Member
Mick's refraction simulator is well-suited for examining shots of distant objects made possible by temperature inversion. However it is a complex visual tool, and usually I just want the "Refracted Hidden" number from the curve calculator. This requires estimating the temperature gradient, but I haven't yet seen a discussion on how to do this.

During a common case of temperature inversion, warm air over cool water, the temperature gradient can vary greatly near the water, yet the refraction model reduces it to a single number. Could the model even produce a reasonable result in this situation?

I've been obtaining decent answers from the curve calculator using the following estimate:

(temperature gradient) = ((air temperature) - (water temperature)) / (visible height of target)​

I will provide the rationale later, but for now let's test it out.

Blackpool to Snaefell, Isle of Man

A shot from a previous thread with increased contrast:

65 miles away; viewer height of about 6 inches. Profile taken from the one Mick posted:

In the shot, a sliver of the connecting valley is visible on the right, corresponding to about 75 pixels from the top in the profile. The profile is 248 pixels high and Snaefell is 2034ft, so we see about (75/248)*2034 ≈ 615ft of the mountain.

Also from the Blackpool thread:

26.5C = 79.7F. The temperature gradient is (79.7 - 61)/615 ≈ 0.03040650406.

1329.04 + 615 = 1944.04; actual 2034.

Liverpool to Snaefell, Isle of Man

Picture from a relatively recent video:

84 miles away; viewer height of 218ft. Profile again:

I don't quite see the valley on the right of Snaefell this time. I estimate the horizon to be about 55 pixels down in the profile, which translates to (55/248)*2034 ≈ 451 feet of the mountain showing.

Unfortunately there is no time stamp apart from the upload date, 29 August 2019. Liverpool had a warm spell the previous week.

Let's say the temperature was 20C = 68F when the video was made. Sea temperature:

The temperature gradient is (68-61.9)/451 = 0.01352549889.

1643.3 + 451 = 2094.3; actual 2034.

Fort Niagara, NY to Toronto

Picture from a previously discussed video:

30.86 miles away; viewer height of 37ft. Note the date of 18 Feb 2017. Mick created a profile overlay in a previous thread:

The CN Tower is 1815ft. Measuring the slanted distances, I estimate 381 pixels out of 441 pixels are above the horizon, so about (381/441)*1815 ≈ 1600 feet of the tower is visible.

At 1:07 in the video, the long shadows coming from the west indicate late afternoon, about 55F:

Water temperature:

Temperature gradient is (55 - 34.5)/1600 = 0.0128125.

198.27 + 1600 = 1798.27; actual 1815.


Viewer is on the left; target is on the right. Assume warm air and cool water.

Although the temperature gradient is constant in the refraction model, in reality the gradient is much higher near the water. However if we are only concerned with the highest point on the target then it's not so bad to spread the gradient evenly from the horizon to the top of the target, like spreading a lump of butter over bread.

Why use the visible height of the target instead of its actual height? Since the most significant refraction takes place near the horizon, we want the model to capture that aspect. Consider a very tall target that is barely peeking above the horizon. Close to the horizon the refraction is greater, but this will not be reflected in the model if we spread the gradient across the actual height of the target, resulting in a small gradient.

In this method for estimating temperature gradients, shorter targets are naturally assigned higher gradients. This comports with shorter targets being stretched in comparison to their taller counterparts, as shown the shot of Toronto.
Last edited:
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Flat Earth and Refraction with Oil Platforms Hillhouse and Habitat Flat Earth 5
H Illusions of Curvature - RC Boat Hidden on Small Pond Flat Earth 10
J A question about refraction Flat Earth 5
J Does google earth pro simulate refraction [No] Flat Earth 7
Mick West Shockwave Shadow and Refraction Spikes Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 16
Stefan Leahu How atmospheric tunelling and refraction really look like in real life. Flat Earth 0
Wiggles Refraction Variations Over Water to Bell Island Flat Earth 27
Qulaey Explained: 17.61 Mile Mirror Flash Supposedly Proves Flat Earth [Refraction] Flat Earth 5
Mick West Improving the Laser Dot Rendering in The Refraction Simulator Tools for Investigating and Debunking 8
Mick West Demonstrating How Refraction Helps You See Over The Horizon Flat Earth 32
Mick West Observations of Brighton from Worthing Pier Flat Earth 135
MisterB Debunked: Isle of Man from Blackpool at water level proves flat earth [refraction] Flat Earth 19
PeteShasta Observations of Mallorca Island and the Earth's Curvature Flat Earth 28
Mick West Curvature and Refraction in Surveying and Leveling Through History. Old Books, etc. Flat Earth 14
Everett Anderson Standard Atmospheric Refraction: Empirical Evidence and Derivation Flat Earth 18
jeranism Explained: Observations of Canigou, Curvature of the Earth & Atmospheric Refraction Flat Earth 158
Mick West Simulating Atmospheric Refraction Tools for Investigating and Debunking 73
Mick West Video of New Orleans Superdome Illustrating Curvature and Refraction Flat Earth 5
Sandor Szekely Atmospheric sunlight refraction arguments on the Eratosthenes triangulation method Flat Earth 37
Mick West A Coronal Iridescent Contrail Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 1
David Ridlen Earth curvature refraction experiments - debunking flat/concave Earth Flat Earth 344
justanairlinepilot Interesting Refraction/Diffraction phenomenon [Subhorizon halos: Sub-sun, Sub-sundog] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 12
Mick West Metabunk 2.0 Site Feedback & News 34
Mick West Tales From the Rabbit Hole - A Mick West / Metabunk Podcast Tales From the Rabbit Hole Podcast 20
Mick West I'm displaying ads for ETRH on Metabunk Site Feedback & News 8
ConfusedHominid Need Debunking (Claim): Metabunk Curve Calculator Does Not Calculate for Angular Size Flat Earth 13
Mick West Metabunk Flat Earth Route Simulator Tools for Investigating and Debunking 17
Inti Presenting the good stuff in Metabunk and Contrail Science in a different way? Practical Debunking 6
MikeC Metabunk linked from article on "Truthers" Sandy Hook 2
Mick West Metabunk is Five Years Old Site Feedback & News 15
Libertarian Monetizing Metabunk? Site Feedback & News 22
Mick West The Linode/Metabunk Power Outage Site Feedback & News 5
Critical Thinker How to search for an image on Metabunk (and other websites) How To 9
Mick West Metabunk is Four Years Old Site Feedback & News 16
Sine metu Metabunk is my new rabbit hole Escaping The Rabbit Hole 12
Mick West Metabunk is Three Years Old Site Feedback & News 6
MikeC Has Trolling Increased, here on Metabunk? Site Feedback & News 11
Clock The members of Metabunk are a "Disinformation Group" General Discussion 18
Mick West How to Post an Image on Metabunk How To 5
Mick West About Metabunk Site Feedback & News 0
Mick West Metabunk facebook page Site Feedback & News 6
Mick West Do you want to be a moderator on Metabunk? Site Feedback & News 26
Clock List of 9/11 threads on Metabunk General Discussion 0
Mick West Metabunk is now on ForumRunner for iPhone, iPad and Android Site Feedback & News 0
Mick West Is Metabunk slow for you Site Feedback & News 8
Mick West Contrail Science and Metabunk on the Critical Wit Podcast General Discussion 0
Related Articles

Related Articles