How to take Photos of the ISS (International Space Station) with a P900

Mick West

Staff member
20160929-215312-f1r50.jpgISS at about 83° above Shingle Springs, California, ISO 400, 1/250th, f/6.5. Manual focus. Handheld.

In case someone else want to try the same thing, here's ALL the settings and procedures

  • This is for a Nikon P900, but other cameras should be similar.
  • Turn the selector dial to M mode (manual)
  • ISO 400 - You need to set the ISO manually otherwise it with try to compensate for the blackness and select a really high ISO, and overexpose. M Mode does not fix the ISO, you need to to Menu->M->ISO Sensitivity->400
  • Set the exposure to 1/250 1/2000 and f6.5 (you can select a wider aperture when not zoomed in, but at full zoom you are limited to f/6.5)
  • Select manual focus. The autofocus system WILL NOT focus on the ISS 95% of the time, and you only need one focus setting - infinity.
  • Image Quality to FINE. This doubles the file size, but really you should have FINE as default.
  • Image Size to 16M. Obviously you want the highest resolution possible
  • Use maximum OPTICAL zoom. On the P900 that's 2000mm
  • Turn off digital zoom as it messes with snap-back zoom, making it very hard to frame manually
  • Vibration Reduction should be ON. But I'm not sure if "Normal" or "Active" would be best. I used "Normal".
  • Manual focus on the P900 is a little complicated. I suggest you familiarize yourself with it well before the event. Some things I did:
    • Turn off peaking - that the white fringe that goes around things when they are in focus. The problem being the ISS and stars appear white. So the peaking just makes them look bigger and out of focus when they are in focus. So turn it off (you can just set it to 0 on the focus screen). The exception here is if you pre-focussing on the moon.
    • Focus on something else first. Don't waste time setting your focus on the ISS as it whizzes overhead. Focus on something else in the sky first. In order of preference:
      • The Moon - is ideal, as you can see the focus really well, and can use AF (Auto Focus)
      • Venus - also good, as it should come out like a tiny disc, and it's easily spottable if it's up, however you will need to focus manually.
      • Another planet - Mars or Jupiter can work if you can find them. Jupiter is a good test of focus, as you should be able to see the moons.
      • A bright star, if none of the above is available
    • If you are focussing on a star or planet, then use the manual focus to simply make it as small as possible (while zoomed in all the way). i.e. focus past it until it goes out of focus, then back again, and repeat a few times to find the middle.
  • Use snap-back zoom every time you lose the ISS in the viewfinder.
  • Turn off Image Review. (Setup->Image Review) this obscures your view for too long, wastes time, press the Play button if you want to look at the last image.
  • Take lots of photos, especially when the ISS is at its highest point

Things to consider
  • Tripod? The problem is that the best shots are when the ISS is nearly vertically overhead. You need to make sure your tripod allows you get the shot - which means you need one with a center column you can raise to allow you to tilt the head to 90°. You'll probably need to use the rear monitor screen folded out and rotated rather than the electronic viewfinder. I did not use a tripod as my fluid head tripod does not have a center column, and my other one is rather flimsy. But I think I'll try it next time. (especially as I just discoved I can reposition the handles on my fluid head tripod, doh!)
  • Exposure Settings? These shots are probably overexposed. What should I adjust? I'm thinking I'll try 1/2000 next time (UPDATE: Having seen some 1/2000 shots, that seems to work a lot better)
  • Lower ISO? ISO 400 is normally reasonable, but as every pixel counts here, perhaps it would be better to use ISO 100? (UPDATE: 1/2000 @ ISO 200 gives good results, so could also use 1/1000th at ISO 100).
  • Pre-shooting Cache? Do not use, this degrades the image quality too much.
  • Continuous-H? Takes multiple shots rapidly, but then has a longer pause for processing them. You will need to snap-back zoom. But probably would anyway. You might be able to use these to increase resolution with stacking.
  • Digital Zoom? Supposedly better than blowing it up later, but makes it incredibly hard to keep in frame. Maybe with a tripod.
  • Video - Since it records in 1080p, and the actual image is 3456 lines, you are shooting at 1/3.5 the actual resolution you would need to record at 4x digital zoom to get all the pixels. This would make it incredibly difficult to keep in shot. Fluid head tripod is needed
When and where?

You can find out when it's going to be visible by subscribing the the NASA "Spot the Station" site, which can email you whenever there's going to be a good flyover, or just give you a list of all upcoming times when it will be visible, for example, near me:


This shows (in red) the time of the flyover. The 9:25 time is when it is first visible over the horizon (10° above South West). It starts out as a disappointing slow moving dim dot, but quite quickly gets higher, brighter and faster. A "good" sighting would be anything over 45° Max Height, but the closer to 90° the better.

You also need to position yourself so you have a clear view to where it will "rise", so you can see it coming.

Post Processing

You will end up (hopefully) with photos like this:

You will need to crop and enlarge them. Just enlarged to actual pixels it looks like:
Or zoomed in:

You can remove the blockiness by increasing the resolution to 400%

Then you can fiddle with it until it looks good.

Have a look at other photos to see what you are looking at. Here's a comparison with a photo taken though a telescope:
Source: Josh Borup, Reddit.

The shape of the ISS varies a lot, depending on your view angle, the position of the sun, and the configuration of the solar panels. Here's a better telescope image, but with the body at a different angle.
Source: Ralf Vandeburg,

Vandeburg's telescope is significantly larger than a P900:
Last edited:
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
MrAudi92 Green Bay, Wisconsin/Weyauwega U.S. UFO Photos (2003 and 2007) UFOs and Aliens 6
Mick West Debunked: Diving Triangle UFO Photos from Reddit [Fake] UFOs and Aliens 37
Q Explained: HomeSteadHow "UFO" Photos [Helicopter] UFOs and Aliens 54
LorentzHall 'Transmedium Sphere' Photos (Jeremy Corbell) UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 7
Mick West Sphere, Acorn, Metallic Blimp - Three iPhone Photos From an F-18 via Mystery Wire UFO Videos and Reports from the US Navy 170
Mick West How Do You Stage UFO Photos and Videos? Let us Count the Ways. UFOs and Aliens 42
I Thylacines in Tasmania (New photos from 1st March 2021) General Discussion 44
Mick West Biden's New Head [Old Photos, Squinting, Hair Transplant] Election 2020 22
TEEJ Explained: Inaguration Photos from Different Angles Show Different Backgrounds. Election 2020 9
P Debunked: 7 Alleged photos of aliens UFOs and Aliens 9
DasKleineTeilchen 2,400 "new" unseen 9/11 photos found at estate sale, june 2019 9/11 12
Mick West "Golden Orb" Daytime Reflective Sphere UFOs in Photos UFOs and Aliens 42
Mick West Infrared Photos of Clouds and Contrails Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 17
chrono117 How to Debunk Flat Earth Without Relying on NASA or Photos Flat Earth 42
creatonez Explained: Why the Earth does not look oblate in photos from space Flat Earth 5
Mick West Strange Lights in Phone Photos - Flash Reflection from Window UFOs and Aliens 0
Mick West Some New-ish WTC7 Photos (and video?) Corner Damage 9/11 6
tadaaa Debunked: Fake photos-Novichok attack Russian 'agents' (side by side gates) General Discussion 34
Priyadi Explained: Why We Don't See Satellites in Photos Taken From The ISS Flat Earth 1
Mick West WTC7 South Side Photos 9/11 2
George Tasker Using pin hole lenses to debunk CGI Rebuttals of Photos of Earth Curvature Flat Earth 7
Mick West Debunked: "FBI releases 27 classified photos of 9/11 Pentagon attacks" [Not New] 9/11 8
Mick West The P900 Rippling Orb Effect & Taking Photos of Venus Flat Earth 23
Mick West Contrails Hidden In 1950s and 1960s Family Photos Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 2
Mick West Sunset Photos with "Angel Wings" Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 12
Mick West Explaining the Ghost Boy in the Back Seat Photo with Occam's Razor Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 99
Mick West P900 Plane and Contrails Photos and Video Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 17
Mick West How Do You Take Good Photos of High Altitude Planes and Contrails? Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 1
Jonathan Evans Explained: Jupiter Photos look the same [Composite photo] Flat Earth 5
Mick West Space Station Photos Disprove the "Flat Earth" Theory Flat Earth 113
Mick West Photos in Middelveen's & Stricker's Morgellons papers that look like Stellate Trichomes. General Discussion 8
Leifer Jet ID....the underside, from photos/videos Contrails and Chemtrails 3
G Are these old photos of contrails? Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 18
MikeG Debunked: Fukushima Causing Bloody Tumors in Fish [Old Photos] Science and Pseudoscience 15
deirdre Debunked: Police took photos before attending to wounded Sandy Hook 1
Trailblazer Cloud Forms, 1949, British Air Ministry Images and Videos: Contrails, Skies, and Aviation 2
Mick West Debunked: "Blue Marble" Photos show a Changing Earth Flat Earth 40
Tony_Sigel Debunked: Chang'e-2 photos of Alien Base on Moon [Hoax] UFOs and Aliens 14
JesseCuster Satellite photos of clouds Practical Debunking 3
MikeG Debunked: Crime Scene Photos "Prove" Sandy Hook was a Hoax Sandy Hook 107
TWCobra Madisonstar Moon posts 59 year old photo of B47's contrailing. Contrails and Chemtrails 0
Mick West Explained: Hampton Court Ghost Photo [iPhone Panorama Glitch] Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 8
WhiteTiger Explained: "Chemdust fallout" [Out of Focus Photos of dust, mist, lights, etc.] Contrails and Chemtrails 21
Redwood Debunked: Google photos show Ottawa Parliament bullet holes are fake Conspiracy Theories 115
Trailblazer Explained: Bands of colored "particles" in sky photos [digital camera artifact] Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 21
Avestriel Hindu Guru Magic Ghosts, Monsters, and the Paranormal 5
L Photos of trails over Switzerland [back to the 1970s] and Chemical Analysis of Jacuzzi Cover Water Contrails and Chemtrails 18
Mick West Solved: "Alien" with "shadow" on the Moon [Debris in Camera] UFOs and Aliens 59
Cloudsorchems Lack of Contrails in Old Photos of Chicago Contrails and Chemtrails 11
Ezswo [Solved] MH-17 was 9M-MRD, so Why are there photos of 9M-MRC? ['D' partially obscured] Flight MH17 204
Related Articles

Related Articles