If you are referring to this video:In the case of Building 7 the "body of evidence" (unfalsifiable) is the onset and progress of the fires themselves, which were still finding new combustible areas as the building collapsed. Over the years, even I have been worn down a little by the truther notion of "sporadic and insubstantial fires" but today I saw a new view of the WTC7 collapse which showed billowing smoke prior to collapse, which was obviously the product of a fire that was nowhere near "sporadic and insubstantial".
From this post: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/the-uniqueness-of-the-wtc7-collapse.1972/page-14#post-69911
It should be noted the fire and much of the smoke is WTC 5, not 7.
The fires in 7 were sporadic and insubstantial and no matter how many times debunkers accidentally confuse the fires of 5 with 7, 7's fires will not get any bigger or less sporadic and it is entirely inconceivable that any credibility whatsoever can ever be given to the idea that at any time 7 was "entirely involved in fire"... because it never ever was, no matter how much debunkers would love it to be the case!
Last edited by a moderator: