CuriousityC
New Member
Hello everyone,
I'm a student of aeronautics & precision and I have been busy in the recent weeks gathering information from 700 BC till now, on how did we conclude the shape of earth. I have gathered so much information for debunking the flat earth lie, in a new way and extra evidences.
But while I was conducting researches on the 16th and 17th centuries, specifically on Tycho Braha, I saw a community forum that believes in global earth but proposes a conspiracy theory that NASA hides the truth of geocentrism.
The proposer of the idea doesn't come from an academic background, and his writings are not on professional level, but while checking his writings, I found that their community forum believes that the actual location of Mars during its apparent retrograde motion throughout 9 years of observation, does not match with what we see in the Copernican system simulations.
He must be wrong and doesn't understand the phenomena. So I am not here to promote his idea, but I seek your help for finding an explanation.
He claims that the two images below show the traces of Mars in 2003 and 2012 during its apparent retrograde motion, and claims that the Copernican simulations don't show the same trace in 2012, on the other hands, the Tycho's model simulation matches with the traces in both dates (2003 and 2012)
Photographs of Mars traces, claimed to be taken by a turkish-American photographer (Tunc Tezel), and I can't verify that.
I checked his claim through a simulation named (SolarSystemScope), and it showed that his claim seems to be weirdly correct. The motion of Mars from Earth did not match with the trace of 2012. On the other hands, I tried it on Tycho's simulation and it matched with the photographs.
Could this be because the Copernican simulation apps that we use, aren't considering Kepler equations of motion? Is there a simulation that is verified to be accurately matching the actual planets motion?
Or could this be because the Tycho's simulation program code is written in a way to show that motion?
Any thoughts guys to debunk him? Thank you in advance for your time to look into it.
I'm a student of aeronautics & precision and I have been busy in the recent weeks gathering information from 700 BC till now, on how did we conclude the shape of earth. I have gathered so much information for debunking the flat earth lie, in a new way and extra evidences.
But while I was conducting researches on the 16th and 17th centuries, specifically on Tycho Braha, I saw a community forum that believes in global earth but proposes a conspiracy theory that NASA hides the truth of geocentrism.
The proposer of the idea doesn't come from an academic background, and his writings are not on professional level, but while checking his writings, I found that their community forum believes that the actual location of Mars during its apparent retrograde motion throughout 9 years of observation, does not match with what we see in the Copernican system simulations.
He must be wrong and doesn't understand the phenomena. So I am not here to promote his idea, but I seek your help for finding an explanation.
He claims that the two images below show the traces of Mars in 2003 and 2012 during its apparent retrograde motion, and claims that the Copernican simulations don't show the same trace in 2012, on the other hands, the Tycho's model simulation matches with the traces in both dates (2003 and 2012)
Photographs of Mars traces, claimed to be taken by a turkish-American photographer (Tunc Tezel), and I can't verify that.
I checked his claim through a simulation named (SolarSystemScope), and it showed that his claim seems to be weirdly correct. The motion of Mars from Earth did not match with the trace of 2012. On the other hands, I tried it on Tycho's simulation and it matched with the photographs.
Could this be because the Copernican simulation apps that we use, aren't considering Kepler equations of motion? Is there a simulation that is verified to be accurately matching the actual planets motion?
Or could this be because the Tycho's simulation program code is written in a way to show that motion?
Any thoughts guys to debunk him? Thank you in advance for your time to look into it.
Last edited: