Has anyone caught another UFO in Mexico recently?

[Starflint]

noticed that someone has been circulating this video on the internet recently：

I found the original source，But I didn't see any introduction:
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?ref=saved&v=1530778987599386&locale=zh_CN
（Judging from past posts on his home page, the blogger seems to be an alien culture enthusiast）

From the videos of other people moving things, I can learn very little about them (perhaps inaccurately)

I noticed two comments in the comments section. How helpful is that?

Is it the camera's aperture, or is it just a chandelier?

 

[flarkey]

It is a streetlight. Specifically the streetlight right in front of the camera.

 

[Mendel]

It's a good thread starter post that contains everything needed to solve the mystery!

 

[JMartJr]

It is a streetlight. Specifically the streetlight right in front of the camera.

Yeah, but it surprises me how stable the image is on the handheld camera that is moving around a LOT, as seen when the second camera is zoomed out (or moved back). Is image stabilization of the camera THAT good? Or might there have been an extra step, where the light is shot with a steady camera, ensuring that the UFO stays in frame, then what we are seeing on the camera display is a playback of that video as shot by the second camera?

 

[FatPhil]

Yeah, but it surprises me how stable the image is on the handheld camera that is moving around a LOT, as seen when the second camera is zoomed out (or moved back). Is image stabilization of the camera THAT good?

Looks like a Canon, and their IS has massively improved over the last decade or so. The days of 2-3 stops of IS from my 600D from 2011 and kit 55-250mm lens are long gone:
"Time to ditch the tripod? The Canon EOS R3, EOS R5, EOS R6 and EOS R7 deliver up to 8-stops of IS, opening up a new world of photo and video opportunities."
https://www.canon-europe.com/pro/stories/8-stops-image-stabilization/
That's in-body plus lens stabilisation in tandem. I can't quite reproduce as stable an image as they're getting, so presumably they have something a couple of generations better than I do.

 

[JMartJr]

Looks like a Canon, and their IS has massively improved over the last decade or so...

Thanks, that will save me time trying to figure out just why they would resort to the more clunky expedient of shooting their UFO once, then shooting it again played back on one camera with a second camera. With what you describe, this could be done easily in one take with two live cameras. Presumably that is better than just showing us the video as taken by the primary camera, as it might help convince people it is not faked with VFX -- though if you think about it, why the guy taking our video would not, if actually looking at a non-faked REAL UFO!!!!!, point his camera at the object directly remains a mystery. If it were me, I'd want my own video of the UFO, not a shot of somebody else's camera getting the important footage of aliens from another world...

 

[FatPhil]

Thanks, that will save me time trying to figure out just why they would resort to the more clunky expedient of shooting their UFO once, then shooting it again played back on one camera with a second camera.

They're not filming playback, they're filming filming. It's the light that's right in front of them, as @flarkey pointed out. I think they think they're filming what's probably a planet to the light's left, but if so their spacial awareness seems to be as poor as their awareness of what streetlights look like (as that "UFO" looks just like a streetlight to me, how they couldn't have identified it boggles the mind).