HAARP-Website offline (Navy renegotiating management contract)

FreiZeitGeist

Senior Member.
Anybody noticed, that the official HAARP-Website http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/index.html seems to be offline since a week?

There´s a copy of the site in the "Internet Archive":
http://web.archive.org/web/20130531040626/http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/index.html

Only GodlikeProdutions has a small thread about it (with the wrong conclusion that they moved to the faked "Haarp-Status" at theweatherspace.com)

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2268857/pg1

Does anybody has some facts about?!

EDIT BY MICK: Answered in post below:
I went to the University of Alaska's GeoData Center to see if there was data from any of the instruments at the HAARP facility. At the top of the Magnetometer page is the following message:

http://www.asf.alaska.edu/program/gdc/project/magnetometer/liveplot

So I did what seems logical to me and wrote to the contact email and asked why the Gakona station was off-line. Here's the answer:

I redacted the name because of the tendency of some conspiracy theorists to harass people.

So basically they "pulled the plug" until this management issue is resolved. The irony is that the "notorious" Office of Naval Research is no longer willing to oversee management of a facility that is allegedly a secretive super powerful weather/earthquake/mind control/etc. weapon. :)
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I suspect its simply broken. Looking at the first version of the web page from 1997 it seems the site has pretty much been the same (just increasing in size) for 16 years. This means that it was probably running off a PC somewhere, or at least had a rather idiosyncratic hand-coded setup. Unfortunately the contact email looks like it's on the same server.
 

FreiZeitGeist

Senior Member.
The Haarp-facility seems not to be the busiest place in the world :)

View attachment 3270

Visitors awing at the magnificent site of the 180 antenna arrays which are operated based on the interest and support from the agencies sponsoring the research. Prior to 2003, the array was operated four to six, 10-day campaigns per year. Since 2007, the number has increased to about 12 per year.
Comment under second picture from here:
http://www.kirtland.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123215732
 

Cairenn

Senior Member.
And this

 

AdamGDog

New Member
I have noticed HAARP has gone offline. But I actually need to contact them for a feature documentary that I am making. I need to actually rule them out of the cause of a 'hum' coming from a manmade island called 'Zug' between Detroit, MI and Windsor, ON. I had previously tried contacting them for the last 6 months, then recently tried again (as I am now in full production). They should at least have a media contact person to talk to, but now they don't even have a site. I am very suspicious of this, and the lack of communication. They are suppose to be transparent and open to communication. I may just have to fly to Alaska, and then drive there. They could just be lazy, and understaffed, or possibly over worked.

I need them to say that they are not on Zug Island basically, and then I need them to tell me what they do in a nutshell. Very simple and easy stuff...I don't want to go down the conspiracy road for 'hums' ...it's something I need to rule out officially though. Any help would be appreciated.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I have noticed HAARP has gone offline. But I actually need to contact them for a feature documentary that I am making. I need to actually rule them out of the cause of a 'hum' coming from a manmade island called 'Zug' between Detroit, MI and Windsor, ON. I had previously tried contacting them for the last 6 months, then recently tried again (as I am now in full production). They should at least have a media contact person to talk to, but now they don't even have a site. I am very suspicious of this, and the lack of communication. They are suppose to be transparent and open to communication. I may just have to fly to Alaska, and then drive there. They could just be lazy, and understaffed, or possibly over worked.

I need them to say that they are not on Zug Island basically, and then I need them to tell me what they do in a nutshell. Very simple and easy stuff...I don't want to go down the conspiracy road for 'hums' ...it's something I need to rule out officially though. Any help would be appreciated.
Did you try calling them?
(907) 822-5497

Frankly though, the idea that they might be on Zug island strikes me as rather improbable. The island is just too small. Here's the HAARP antenna array overlaid for size:


And there's detailed aerial photos of every sqaure foot of the island. There's nowhere to hide an antenna array:
 
Last edited:

AdamGDog

New Member
I agree, and actually this is a good point you made on the size. I have not tried to call, but I will ! Thanks
 

AdamGDog

New Member
oh yeah..that number does not exist by the way.. kinda makes you wonder where they went. One more point is that the map of Zug may not be current. I might rent a plane or chopper to fly over Zug Island...but the antena array could only fit in one spot anyway. The other thing I have noticed is that it would not work well at that latitude (Zugs location). They need the arctic to opperate in the ionosphere properly
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
I think basically HAARP's web site was just very out of date (hence the old phone number), and just died. They are not really super active, so nobody is in charge of fixing it.
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
oh yeah..that number does not exist by the way.. kinda makes you wonder where they went. One more point is that the map of Zug may not be current. I might rent a plane or chopper to fly over Zug Island...but the antena array could only fit in one spot anyway. The other thing I have noticed is that it would not work well at that latitude (Zugs location). They need the arctic to opperate in the ionosphere properly
If you use Google Earth, it tells you the date of the imagery. The most up to date image is from 6/21/2011


it's pretty much unchanged for the last 10 years.


But I see the Windsor hum started around 2011 by most accounts.

I think the Google maps 45 degree imagery is newer. And Bing maps 45 degree is from 2012
http://binged.it/133JFy5
 
Last edited:

solrey

Senior Member.
I went to the University of Alaska's GeoData Center to see if there was data from any of the instruments at the HAARP facility. At the top of the Magnetometer page is the following message:

http://www.asf.alaska.edu/program/gdc/project/magnetometer/liveplot

So I did what seems logical to me and wrote to the contact email and asked why the Gakona station was off-line. Here's the answer:

I redacted the name because of the tendency of some conspiracy theorists to harass people.

So basically they "pulled the plug" until this management issue is resolved. The irony is that the "notorious" Office of Naval Research is no longer willing to oversee management of a facility that is allegedly a secretive super powerful weather/earthquake/mind control/etc. weapon. :)
 

Mick West

Administrator
Staff member
More details:
http://www.arrl.org/news/haarp-facility-shuts-down
 

solrey

Senior Member.
It doesn't matter to those people, they can still see radar anomalies and such so they KNOW that HAARP is still up and running. And Jim has mapped out other "sky heaters" on his fear porn site so if HAARP is down there's always EISCAT et al. To the true believers, the news that it's shut down is just a BS cover story for even bigger and badder nefarious activity. They're on a mission and they will not be deterred by such things as mere facts. On the other side of that coin, there are others who are convinced that it's nexrad stations what are controlling the weather so HAARP is pretty much unnecessary within that scenario.

In the following vid (which Michael Janitch is promoting btw) from one of the "rat pack", they claim that the HAARP facility is not shut down because DARPA has a budget for research to be conducted at the HAARP facility this year. What they overlook is the fact that those experiments are scheduled for the fall and winter. Then again, they ignore most real science in favor of their own brand of pseudo-science.


More of the same...


http://tatoott1009.com/2013/07/15/u...er-modification-and-manufactured-earthquakes/
 

ssfor27

Active Member
And Dutch just LOOVEESSS that screen capture of the Dover AFB "across the spectrum pulse" that was debunked here

He keeps using it over and over again, as if to say "see, see, I captured this in late June, no way is HAARP down".
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Met Watch

Moderator
Kevin Martin of TheWeatherSpace.com claims he has signed a one-year contract with HAARP and currently has it back up and running.

Unless he has the money to keep it running per year (to the tune of several million dollars), this is clear BS.
 

FreiZeitGeist

Senior Member.
Last edited:

ssfor27

Active Member
Does anyone in the conspiracy world ever completely read and or full understand what they are reading? I guess it's just easier to cherry pick what you need out of any particular article, then shoehorn that into said conspiracy, and all of your followers will buy into it, sight unseen, without their own research or fact finding.

Now Dutchsinse, on his Facebook page, is quoting some 8 year old noise study as "proof" the HAARP facility only has a single diesel generator; which, in his mind, means any of the recent reports of the facility shutdown in part because of expensive generator repairs and environmental violations MUST be fabricated.

Except....in the same report he is quoting...it also mentions the future expansion to 5 diesel generators and that "The purpose of this study is to characterize the power plant noise levels, estimate the sound levels emitted from the power plant when all five engines are operating, and compare those estimated sound levels against applicable regulations."

haarp doc 7-18-13.JPG

He also links to another article published in Popular Science in 1995. In it, Dutchsinse seems to find evidence that HAARP runs on natural gas turbines, once again establishing proof the recent statements about HAARP's demise are fabricated. Except the article states:

" Eastlund worked under contract for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (now called ARPA) and was awarded three patents one of which was classified until 1991 for inventions dealing with ionospheric modification. One of the most grandiose systems described in his patents is a 40-mile square, HAARP-like radio transmitter that would have used huge amounts of electric power generated by turbines burning natural gas drawn from the vast North Slope reserves. "

This second article also goes on to mention the existence of multiple diesel generators:

"HAARP's power output nearly twice that of any other ionospheric heater combined with the rapid beam-steering ability and broad frequency range of its transmitter, will permit the IRI to modify higher-altitude areas of the ionosphere from greater distances than ever. A bank of six 2.5megawatt, 3,600-horsepower diesel generators powers the IRI prototype, while the rest of the facility taps electricity from a nearby power line."
 

solrey

Senior Member.
Now Michael Janitch and company have added the fact that DARPA plans on conducting some experiments at the HAARP facility in the fall/winter of 2013 and that there are a couple of research grants awarded that have end dates past the time that HAARP was shut down. One of his cohorts, tatoott1009, even called the ARRL (Amateur Radio Relay League) to harass them over an article on their website about HAARP closing because no author was listed for the article, which he finds suspicious. Michael and his cohorts think they've debunked a "hoax". They're even worse at debunking than they are at interpreting radar data. Of course they ignore the statements that mention it's likely just a temporary situation until a new prime contractor comes on board within the next month or so. He calls the Alaska Dispatch a "HAARP skeptic site" when it's just an online news outlet covering many categories of news in Alaska.

Michael states on his blog that there are Air Force and DoD experiments taking place right now. He thinks that because the AF or DoD are funding grants that they're also conducting the research when in fact the research is being conducted by the University of Alaska. Just because a research grant is valid past the date that HAARP was shut down, it doesn't mean the facility is currently in use. They could have conducted the experiments before the facility shut down and would then spend the rest of the grant period analyzing the data and writing a paper or they might simply be analyzing data collected from other experiments conducted over previous years. Michael Janitch and company obviously know nothing about the process of scientific research and experimentation, or the grants that fund them. Data collected over the course of a few days might take a year or more to fully analyze and research grants cover funding for the entire process from start to finish. I mentioned Michael's nonsense about grants and such to my GF, who is a botanist and intimately familiar with research grants, and with a disgusted look on her face said "those people are freakin' stupid". My sentiments exactly.



http://sincedutch.wordpress.com/201...owars-repeats-the-false-haarp-shutdown-story/

http://www.uaa.alaska.edu/governance/facultysenate/upload/1-final-agenda.pdf

http://www.uaa.alaska.edu/governance/facultysenate/upload/1-Final-Faculty-Senate-Agenda.pdf

http://www.arrl.org/news/haarp-facility-shuts-down

http://www.alaskadispatch.com/about-us

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
 

Jay Reynolds

Senior Member.
Michael Janitch and company obviously know nothing about the process of scientific research and experimentation, or the grants that fund them.
They probably don't care to know, either.

He is a fear-monger who derives some income directly from contributions from his followers.
https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/8NZud

At one point he was hyping every severe weather event saying that weather radars created storms and were killing people. Turned out he was working for a builder of storm shelters and promoting their products.
http://dutchsinse-nonesense.blogspot.com/2012/03/adguy-dutchsinse-sincedutch-has-steered.html

The guy is the purest definition of a con-artist shill who seeks to develop a cult-like following for fame and fortune.
 

solrey

Senior Member.
The guy is the purest definition of a con-artist shill who seeks to develop a cult-like following for fame and fortune.
Yeah, like this rubbish...


What? That's totally nonsensical. I wonder from where he pulled that out of context, other than from out his backside? Noise temperature, transmitter operating temperature, or any one of a thousand other technical details he knows nothing about? In the process of trying to show off to his flock, he just exposes his total and utter ignorance of the subject matter, well pretty much any subject really.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

M Bornong

Senior Member.
Yeah, like this rubbish...


What? That's totally nonsensical. I wonder from where he pulled that out of context, other than from out his backside? Noise temperature, transmitter operating temperature, or any one of a thousand other technical details he knows nothing about? In the process of trying to show off to his flock, he just exposes his total and utter ignorance of the subject matter, well pretty much any subject really.

I had to troll Dutch on a couple of different videos to finally get his explanation for this claim. I received this in my YouTube Inbox, He's removed my comment and his from the comment section, and I'm now blocked from his channel. Darn, now I have to wait for his next "running of the trolls" to have fun with him, again.

Untitled1.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=NvtzG3hmnUE

Side note, the end of the comment Dutch accuses me of being a conspiratard. On this site, we've been accused often, of not believing in any conspiracies. Michael Janitch (aka Dutchsinse). Jim Lee (aka rezn8d), and Tatoott1009 (sorry, don't know him) is a conspiracy of disinformation that I believe is actually in progress. J'accuse, Dutchinse.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

solrey

Senior Member.
I had to troll Dutch on a couple of different videos to finally get his explanation for this claim. I received this in my YouTube Inbox, He's removed my comment and his from the comment section, and I'm now blocked from his channel. Darn, now I have to wait for his next "running of the trolls" to have fun with him, again.

View attachment 3650
http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=NvtzG3hmnUE
Right on. I figured out a couple of days ago where Dutch got that 1000 K microwave beam temperature from. He made that comment a day or two after his buddy tatoott1009 posted an article on his "Tat's Revolution" blog. I was waiting for him to reveal where he got it from before posting it myself.

http://tatoott1009.com/2013/07/14/h...ing-to-occur-elevating-temperatures-to-1700f/

The article on Tat's site is basically just a copy-paste of a scientific report on the environmental impacts of space based solar power and the effect of high energy microwave transmissions through the ionosphere. There are several references to temperatures at or near 1000 K but they all relate to temperatures of electrons and neutrals in the ionosphere. For example:

Michael's "One example from the document" is not even in the document, that's just his interpretation of the above examples and the following:

http://www.esa.int/gsp/ACT/doc/ARI/...nmental_impacts_of microwave_beams-Report.pdf

Michael Janitch's comprehension of that paper is 0 K. (That's zero Kelvin, as in absolute zero.)

There is no such thing as the "temperature" of a microwave beam itself and not all microwave beams are transmitted at the same power or frequency anyway.

So in a comprehensive report on the environmental impacts of powerful microwave beams, nowhere does it mention anything at all about microwaves affecting weather in the troposphere. That would seem like a glaring refutation to the claim that microwaves can produce tornadoes or any other kind of weather phenomenon.

Perhaps the comments relating to the whole 1000 K microwave beam thing should go into a new thread?

cheers
 

scombrid

Senior Member.
It is hard to tell what is infighting in the conspiracy church and what is a publicity stunt/attempt to get persecution points.
 
Thread starter Related Articles Forum Replies Date
Mick West Eruption of Kilauea Volcano in Hawaii – Conspiracies and Science Current Events 34
Mick West HAARP Returns, Holds Open House HAARP 9
MikeG Debunked: HAARP Caught in Action Contrails and Chemtrails 28
Trailblazer Debunked: HAARP has made two islands disappear HAARP 2
MikeG Toxic Spraying and Radio Frequency Bombardment Contrails and Chemtrails 9
deirdre Madison Moonstar's Fake clouds Contrails and Chemtrails 2
ssfor27 How Dutchsinse makes his "HAARP ring" forecasts.... HAARP 14
derrick06 Debunked: HAARP ELF waves causing a earthquake Contrails and Chemtrails 12
cloudspotter Dutchsinse HAARP FOI request HAARP 8
skephu Intersecting cloud ripples Skydentify - What is that Thing in the Sky? 30
cmnit Electrical conductivity of atmosphere before/after "spraying" Contrails and Chemtrails 9
Steve Funk Elana Freeland, "Chemtrails, HAARP and the Full-Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth Contrails and Chemtrails 15
Pete Tar Debunked: Using 13.56Mhz radio waves and HAARP to remove Methane from the Atmosphere HAARP 7
Mick West HAARP is Being Permanently Dismantled HAARP 57
David Fraser The NERC funded MST Radar facility in Wales is not a HAARP installation Contrails and Chemtrails 58
ralph Leo HAARP activity? Contrails and Chemtrails 8
subhumn Can facilities like HAARP be used to manipulate the weather? (No) HAARP 3
ssfor27 Salt Lake City "Haarp Ring" HAARP 15
AluminumTheory Super Typhoon Haiyan - HAARP & Conspiracy Theories Conspiracy Theories 102
Critical Thinker Flooding in Colorado caused by HAARP, nothing to do with Climate Change? Contrails and Chemtrails 24
Leifer Mackerel Skys before HAARP and...... Contrails and Chemtrails 3
Mick West Brooks Agnew's Cloud Chamber HAARP Experiment on Joe Rogan's Question Everything HAARP 31
Met Watch Tropical Systems & HAARP HAARP 2
TornadoTom Debunking Haarp is the reason for longer daylight hours HAARP 3
Mick West HAARP Debunked and Explained HAARP 10
scombrid Moore, Oklahoma tornado caused by HAARP According to Some Conspiracy Believers Conspiracy Theories 47
A.G. "EU Conference on Weather Modification and Geo-Engineering..." Contrails and Chemtrails 29
electrojet Contrails, Gravity Waves, and HAARP Contrails and Chemtrails 188
Steve Funk Earth Day Activity? (Chemtrail/HAARP/Geoengineering protest) Contrails and Chemtrails 23
Oxymoron Norway Spiral. Was it Really a Failed Missile Launch or Was it HAARP (EISCAT) Conspiracy Theories 36
scombrid Debunked: HAARP Builds Noreaster in wake of Sandy HAARP 4
Mick West Debunked: Hurricane Sandy, Chemtrails, HAARP and Conspiracy Theories Conspiracy Theories 138
Mick West America's Most Secret Structures (Chemtrails, HAARP) Contrails and Chemtrails 32
scombrid Debunked:9/9/2012 -- HAARP ring outbreak -- Midwest to South USA HAARP 12
scombrid Circle Sweeps, HAARP Rings, and Scalar Squares are Often From the Birds. HAARP 80
solrey Debunked: HAARP rings/scalar squares, etc. validated in paper from Stanford HAARP 257
MikeC HAARP causing more earthquakes? Conspiracy Theories 18
Mick West Bernard Eastlund's Connection to HAARP People Debunked 102
Mick West Debunked: Louisiana straight line HAARP clouds HAARP 2
Mick West Chemtrails/HAARP Rally on the Victoria Legislature Lawn 23 July, 2011 Contrails and Chemtrails 0
SR1419 HAARP and Chemtrails. Contrails and Chemtrails 3
derrick06 Debunked: United Nations creates a "NWO" website Conspiracy Theories 2
Mick West Debunked: Defcon level raised [Defcon Warning System is a Hobbyist Website] General Discussion 8
S Website set up by Sandy Hook father now redirects to nsa.gov Sandy Hook 20
JDubyah Website Deagel.com projects massive depopulation by 2025 Conspiracy Theories 30
Chew Very useful website - Youtube closed captioning to text file Practical Debunking 0
Qualiall Claim: Mike Adams of Natural News behind Monsanto Collaborators website Health and Quackery 4
AluminumTheory Website traffic and radio audience of Alex Jones, Infowars, Prison Planet, etc. People Debunked 2
Clock Hey guys, what do you think of this website? General Discussion 0
Pete Tar Website overview of the chemtrail mind control plot. Contrails and Chemtrails 1
Related Articles


















































Related Articles

Top